Re: harfbuzz-icu, harfbuzz, webkit-gtk2, webkit2-gtk3, libreoffice, firefox

2017-09-28 Thread Jan Beich
Jan Beich writes: >> make: stopped in /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice >> ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa >> /tmp/portupgrade20170928-17949-1u69e9v env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade >> UPGRADE_PORT=libreoffice-5.3.6_1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=5.3.6_1 make >> ** Fix the problem and try again

Re: harfbuzz-icu, harfbuzz, webkit-gtk2, webkit2-gtk3, libreoffice, firefox

2017-09-28 Thread Jan Beich
(Moving from gnome@ to ports@ as the issue is generic) "Burmeister, Robert" writes: > FreeBSD 11.1 i386 > > Updating: > libreoffice-5.3.6_1 < needs updating (port has 5.3.6_4) > (configure error) > webkit-gtk2-2.4.11_12< needs updating (port has 2.4.11_13) (unknown > build

Re: [HEADUP] FLAVORS landing.

2017-09-28 Thread Adam Weinberger
> On 28 Sep, 2017, at 0:55, Stefan Esser wrote: > > Am 27.09.17 um 22:57 schrieb Don Lewis: >> If at some point you run into a bug and need the debug files, you can >> pkg install the debug files for whatever packages that you need without >> disturbing your already installed runtime files, and t

Re: gettng the port revision number associated with the pkg repo.

2017-09-28 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Julian Elischer writes: > On 26/9/17 10:07 pm, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> Julian Elischer writes: >> >>> SO imagine that I needed to be ab;e to reproduce the pkg repo as of a >>> articular day, is there anywhere one can look to see the svn revision >>> number that corresponds to teh current pkg fi

Re: [HEADUP] FLAVORS landing.

2017-09-28 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 28/09/2017 07:55, Stefan Esser wrote: > The matching of versions of base package and sub-packages must be > more strict than by version number, since trivial changes might be > applied to a port without incrementing the PORTREVISION, but with > impact on the binary, e.g. if the port is to built