On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 4:42 AM, Mike Clarke
wrote:
>
> My daily periodic security run comes up with with these errors:
>
> Checking for packages with mismatched checksums:
> ghc-8.0.2_2: /usr/local/bin/haddock
> ghc-8.0.2_2: /usr/local/lib/ghc-8.0.2/package.conf.d/package.cache
> ghc-8.0.2_2: /us
Hi!
> I recently updated my system (base OS and ports) that I read mail on using
> mutt (accessed via an xterm on a separate system) and am now seeing this sort
> of character string ^@^@> rather than the much more user friently characters I
> used to get.
>
> Anyone know what I can do to get bac
Is the ports maintainer in charge of mail/phpmailer no longer updating it?
I've sent 2 emails a couple months ago and heard nothing back. Also, I
submitted a bug report stating an update is needed - and that is now
collecting dust.
PHPMailer 5.2.26 was released on November 4th. Also, the new v6.0
Anthony Jenkins writes:
> (gdb) where
> #0 stat () at freebsd11_stat.S:3
> #1 0x016a94a0 in std::sys::imp::fs::stat () at
> /checkout/src/libstd/sys/unix/fs.rs:732
> #2 0x016a1a76 in std::fs::metadata<&std::path::Path> () at
> /checkout/src/libstd/fs.rs:1271
> #3 std::path::P
I recently updated my system (base OS and ports) that I read mail on using
mutt (accessed via an xterm on a separate system) and am now seeing this sort
of character string ^@^@> rather than the much more user friently characters I
used to get.
Anyone know what I can do to get back the more readab
I *think* the issue is that I needed to update ~/.muttrc for the change
in gnupg; in particular:
set pgp_decrypt_command="gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --passphrase-fd 0
--no-verbose --batch -o - %f"
was changed to
set pgp_decrypt_command="gpg2 %?p?--passphrase-fd 0 --pinentry-mode=loopback?
--n
Sorry, the language there is unclear. It should say "ssl=[name of the port]".
You just want the ssl=libressl line.
Ah, so the "base" specified here is a constant whereas "port" is a
variable, to be expanded before writing make.conf. If I might then
suggest a potential documentation update:
< W
On 2 Jan, 2018, at 10:47, Roger Marquis wrote:
Per the 20171214 UPDATING entry:
Support for some deprecated variables is going to be removed soon. If
you use any of the following constructs (usually in /etc/make.conf),
you must switch to the new incantations:
...
WITH_OPENSSL_BASE
I have been using mail/mutt & security/gnupg (latter switched to
security/gnupg20 back when gnupg20 port was created because of a
similar-looking issue to what's described in the first part of the
below narrative) for several years -- without enabling "gpgme" (in
case that turns out to be relevant)
Per the 20171214 UPDATING entry:
Support for some deprecated variables is going to be removed soon. If
you use any of the following constructs (usually in /etc/make.conf),
you must switch to the new incantations:
...
WITH_OPENSSL_BASE DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= ssl=base
WITH_
My daily periodic security run comes up with with these errors:
Checking for packages with mismatched checksums:
ghc-8.0.2_2: /usr/local/bin/haddock
ghc-8.0.2_2: /usr/local/lib/ghc-8.0.2/package.conf.d/package.cache
ghc-8.0.2_2: /usr/local/share/doc/ghc-8.0.2/html/libraries/doc-index-33.html
ghc-
Am 02.01.2018 um 10:19 schrieb Jan Beich:
> Try do-patch e.g.,
>
> $ make clean extract do-patch makepatch EXTRA_PATCHES= BATCH=
thanks a lot Jan!
Gruß
Matthias
--
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the unive
On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 7:52 PM, George Mitchell wrote:
> On 01/01/18 13:33, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
>> I would like to thank all programmers and port maintainers for their
>> excellent work in 2017.
>> Without you we would never enjoy BSD as we do until this very day.
>>
>> I really hope that you wil
Matthias Fechner writes:
> Dear all,
>
> I have some ports I maintain and in some of them I have
> post-patch-{{OPTION}}-on Makefile targets in that is patching files.
> But to update the files I need a file where only the patches from
> files/patch-* are applied.
>
> Is there a possibility to sk
Dear all,
I have some ports I maintain and in some of them I have
post-patch-{{OPTION}}-on Makefile targets in that is patching files.
But to update the files I need a file where only the patches from
files/patch-* are applied.
Is there a possibility to skip the post-patch target from the Makefil
15 matches
Mail list logo