ping?
On 3 June 2018 at 17:43, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 16 May 2018 at 22:28, Christopher Hall
> wrote:
>> Hello Eitan,
>>
>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 21:32:20 -0700, Eitan Adler
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ping?
>>>
>>> On 12 May 2018 at 06:06, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> > Can anyone explain why pkg wants to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
looks like this is solved now.
- --
https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
twitter: @nusenu_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEElpDPH7u0KYWVTfK7rWE4wkXNQn4FAlskOPYACgkQrWE4wkXN
Joseph Mingrone writes:
> The Doctor writes:
>> Looks like in any of the autoconf / automake circular error.
>> > Compressing man pages (compress-man)
>> ===>>> Starting check for runtime dependencies
>> ===>>> Gathering dependency list for devel/automake from ports
>> ===>>> Dependency
Hi,
usually I see a more or less steady stream of new builds
at
https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:11:amd64/latest/All/?C=M=D
and they usually are available 1-2 days after the change reached
the svn
but currently the latest build is from 2018-Jun-13 04:49.
Is this expected?
thanks,
nusenu
--
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 8:27 AM Dave Horsfall wrote:
>
> A related discussion reminded me of this: how would Microsoft's purchase
> of GitHub affect future development?
In what ways do you suspect that Microsoft's purchase of GitHub will
affect future FreeBSD development?
FreeBSD hosts its own
> On 15. Jun 2018, at 18:37, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>>
>> github != git
>
> I didn't say that it was; did you misunderstand my message or something?
> someone looking for an alternative to something now owned by M$
Your email sounded like
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 05:44:02PM +0200, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote:
> > Looks like in any of the autoconf / automake circular error.
> >
> > > Compressing man pages (compress-man)
> > ===>>> Starting check for runtime dependencies
> > ===>>> Gathering dependency list for devel/automake
Hi!
> > github != git
>
> I didn't say that it was; did you misunderstand my message or something?
Well, your message suggests moving to a different version
control system because of github. But why should git itself
be touched by this move ? gitlab or gitea or other open source
solutions use
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:35 AM The Doctor wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 09:38:20AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:30 AM The Doctor wrote:
> > >
> > > Looks like in any of the autoconf / automake circular error.
> > >
> > > > Compressing man pages
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Michael Gmelin wrote:
github != git
I didn't say that it was; did you misunderstand my message or something?
-- Dave
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 09:38:20AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:30 AM The Doctor wrote:
> >
> > Looks like in any of the autoconf / automake circular error.
> >
> > > Compressing man pages (compress-man)
> > ===>>> Starting check for runtime dependencies
> >
On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 00:26:36 +1000 (EST) "Dave Horsfall"
said
A related discussion reminded me of this: how would Microsoft's purchase
of GitHub affect future development? After all, they'll get to call the
shots...[*] The only good thing that came out of M$ is their RTF document
format
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:30 AM The Doctor wrote:
>
> Looks like in any of the autoconf / automake circular error.
>
> > Compressing man pages (compress-man)
> ===>>> Starting check for runtime dependencies
> ===>>> Gathering dependency list for devel/automake from ports
> ===>>> Dependency
Looks like in any of the autoconf / automake circular error.
> Compressing man pages (compress-man)
===>>> Starting check for runtime dependencies
===>>> Gathering dependency list for devel/automake from ports
===>>> Dependency check complete for devel/automake
===>>> dns/unbound 2/2 >>
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Jos Chrispijn
wrote:
> Sorry for asking as I think the question hasbeen raised some time
> before(ducking):
>
> Can somebody tell me how I can install phpMyAdmin from the packages?
> Seems that it is not partof the current pkg-repository:
>
> pkg install
Thanks guys, problem solved!
Cheers,
Jos
On 15-6-2018 16:51, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
Sorry for asking as I think the question hasbeen raised some time
before(ducking):
Can somebody tell me how I can install phpMyAdmin from the packages?
Seems that it is not partof the current pkg-repository:
Hi!
> Sorry for asking as I think the question hasbeen raised some time
> before(ducking):
>
> Can somebody tell me how I can install phpMyAdmin from the packages?
It depends on the version of php you want to depend on:
pkg install phpMyAdmin-php72
or 71, 70 or 56.
--
p...@opsec.eu
On 15-6-2018 16:51, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
> Sorry for asking as I think the question hasbeen raised some time
> before(ducking):
>
> Can somebody tell me how I can install phpMyAdmin from the packages?
> Seems that it is not partof the current pkg-repository:
>
> pkg install phpmyadmin
> Updating
Sorry for asking as I think the question hasbeen raised some time
before(ducking):
Can somebody tell me how I can install phpMyAdmin from the packages?
Seems that it is not partof the current pkg-repository:
pkg install phpmyadmin
Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue...
FreeBSD repository is
> On 15. Jun 2018, at 16:26, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>
> A related discussion reminded me of this: how would Microsoft's purchase of
> GitHub affect future development? After all, they'll get to call the
> shots...[*] The only good thing that came out of M$ is their RTF document
> format
A related discussion reminded me of this: how would Microsoft's purchase
of GitHub affect future development? After all, they'll get to call the
shots...[*] The only good thing that came out of M$ is their RTF document
format (used natively by the Mac's TextEdit utility, for example), which
Hm, seems like you're right, which is good news for me, I always built
it without perl until this commit:
r396048 | garga | 2015-09-04 00:00:03 +0200 (Fri, 04 Sep 2015) | 5 lines
- Update to 2.5.1
- Fix build with NO_PERL set backporting a commit from git repo
(82aec45)
- Add git-submodile,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:24:06AM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote:
>
> > On 15. Jun 2018, at 10:10 AM, Mahmoud Al-Qudsi wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 2:57 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> >> Last time I checked, building git without Perl broke submodules (which is
> >> a core feature that
> On 15. Jun 2018, at 10:10 AM, Mahmoud Al-Qudsi wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 2:57 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>> Last time I checked, building git without Perl broke submodules (which is a
>> core feature that should work with a default installation).
>
> I fully agree. Fortunately,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 2:57 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> Last time I checked, building git without Perl broke submodules (which is a
> core feature that should work with a default installation).
I fully agree. Fortunately, (at least at a first glance) that does not
seem to be the case.
I just
> On 15. Jun 2018, at 05:57, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 8:16 PM Mahmoud Al-Qudsi wrote:
>>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> I'm probably not alone in considering git to be a core development tool,
>> perhaps just a notch or two below the C compiler. `git` and `sudo` are the
>>
26 matches
Mail list logo
