On 4 August 2018 18:59:30 BST, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>05.08.2018 0:42, Eitan Adler wrote:
>
>>> Feel free to commit, but please use the absolute path to vi?
>>
>> Why? Would't one want to respect the user's preference when it comes
>> to an editor? This preference is implicit when it comes t
Am 04.08.2018 um 17:06 schrieb René Ladan:
> How about the attached patch?
LGTM.
Gruß
Matthias
--
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to
produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe
On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 10:42:36 -0700
Eitan Adler wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 at 08:13, Chris Rees wrote:
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> > On 4 August 2018 15:15:23 BST, Eugene Grosbein
> > wrote:
> > >04.08.2018 21:03, Romain Tartière wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 12:28:41PM +0200, Matthias
05.08.2018 0:42, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> Feel free to commit, but please use the absolute path to vi?
>
> Why? Would't one want to respect the user's preference when it comes
> to an editor? This preference is implicit when it comes to PATH.
This is traditional overcautiousness against user's pos
On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 at 08:13, Chris Rees wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> On 4 August 2018 15:15:23 BST, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> >04.08.2018 21:03, Romain Tartière wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 12:28:41PM +0200, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> >>> ./rmport: svnlog: not found
> >>>
> >>> Anyone an idea wha
Hey,
On 4 August 2018 15:15:23 BST, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>04.08.2018 21:03, Romain Tartière wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 12:28:41PM +0200, Matthias Fechner wrote:
>>> ./rmport: svnlog: not found
>>>
>>> Anyone an idea what is wrong?
>>
>> Never used this script, but I guess you are hitt
On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 9:06 AM René Ladan wrote:
>
> How about the attached patch?
>
> Rene
Hi René,
You have:
+PAGER=${PAGER:-more}
svn up --quiet ports 2>&1 |${PAGER:-less}
# Adam
--
Adam Weinberger
ad...@adamw.org
https://www.adamw.org
___
fre
Thanks Eugene,
Am 04.08.2018 um 16:15 schrieb Eugene Grosbein:
> It seems, rmport script needs a patch:
>
> Index: Tools/scripts/rmport
> ===
> --- Tools/scripts/rmport(revision 476322)
> +++ Tools/scripts/rmport(worki
On 8/4/18 4:15 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 04.08.2018 21:03, Romain Tartière wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 12:28:41PM +0200, Matthias Fechner wrote:
>>> ./rmport: svnlog: not found
>>>
>>> Anyone an idea what is wrong?
>> Never used this script, but I guess you are hitting line 390:
>>
>> |
04.08.2018 21:03, Romain Tartière wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 12:28:41PM +0200, Matthias Fechner wrote:
>> ./rmport: svnlog: not found
>>
>> Anyone an idea what is wrong?
>
> Never used this script, but I guess you are hitting line 390:
>
> | $EDITOR svnlog
>
> Any chance $EDITOR i
On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 12:28:41PM +0200, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> ./rmport: svnlog: not found
>
> Anyone an idea what is wrong?
Never used this script, but I guess you are hitting line 390:
| $EDITOR svnlog
Any chance $EDITOR is not set?
--
Romain Tartière http://people.FreeBSD.or
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
Dear all,
I just try to delete my first port, but I have some problems.
I tried it with the script Tools/scripts/rmport
security/rubygem-omniauth-shibboleth12
But it fails with:
==> creating temporary directory
==> created /tmp/rmport.QRBlqG8d
==> getting ports/MOVED and ports/LEGAL from reposi
I'd rather keep the subject on topic about archiving
the final quarterly package builds [1] in variously
accessible ways for varied lengths of time.
Please pull the convo on overall ports strategy
into a different subject.
[1] Or the finals / checkpoints of whatever
strategies are in place into t
14 matches
Mail list logo