My system has no X11 window system of any sort on it, it is simply a server
which I (or anyone else) only interact with via the command line or by
accessing a service like http or mail.
And yet, there's a lot of x11 packages installed.
I'd like to find out what packages depend on the many x11 pa
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 1:53 AM @lbutlr wrote:
>
> My system has no X11 window system of any sort on it, it is simply a server
> which I (or anyone else) only interact with via the command line or by
> accessing a service like http or mail.
> And yet, there's a lot of x11 packages installed.
>
>
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018, 15:55 @lbutlr wrote:
> My system has no X11 window system of any sort on it, it is simply a
> server which I (or anyone else) only interact with via the command line or
> by accessing a service like http or mail.
> And yet, there's a lot of x11 packages installed.
>
> I'd li
So, I've been working on porting molecule
(https://pypi.org/project/molecule/), and I have a port that /almost/
works. I can compile and run molecule from my shell prompt using the
port. Everything seems fine.
Except when I try and build the port inside poudriere. It seems that
python setuptool
This one should work: http://dpaste.com/0P2SBMM.txt
but it wouldn't, because of pbr's dependency on broken devel/py-pip (it
requires previous version of dns/py-idna, that we no more have in ports
tree).
As for your question:
pbr is set in molecule's setup.py as setup_depends, so it should go t
On 22/09/2018 19:13, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
> As for your question:
> pbr is set in molecule's setup.py as setup_depends, so it should go to
> BUILD_DEPENDS in Makefile. Also make sure that you list all the
> dependencies from the molecule's requirements.txt as RUN_DEPENDS.
That's fixed it, t
On 22 Sep 2018, at 08:08, blubee blubeeme wrote:
> I usually do something like this with poudriere
I am not up for another package manager, I am still getting used to the switch
to postmaster from ... I dunno, 5 years ago?
but i'll look at pkg_tree
--
'Oh, them as makes the endings don't get
On 22 Sep 2018, at 07:06, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> You might give pkg_tree (ports-mgmt/pkg_tree) a try. It won't answer
> the question specifically, but it'll show you how libX11 is being
> brought into apache24.
That's worked perfectly, and I would NEVER have found it, because libx11 was
under
On 22 Sep, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 22 Sep 2018, at 07:06, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>> You might give pkg_tree (ports-mgmt/pkg_tree) a try. It won't answer
>> the question specifically, but it'll show you how libX11 is being
>> brought into apache24.
>
> That's worked perfectly, and I would NEVER have f
