Adam Weinberger wrote:
> Setting PORTNAME=xed undoes any benefit of putting it in editors/x-ed,
> as the PKGBASE will conflict.
>
The editors/x-ed location is merely temporary; I didn't even add it to
INDEX pending a final consensus on what to do.
> I agree that the current editors/xed looks
On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 6:36 PM Charlie Li via freebsd-ports
wrote:
>
> Charlie Li wrote:
> > The Cinnamon desktop environment now has its own collection of desktop
> > applications, X-Apps, basically forked from their GNOME and MATE
> > counterparts. The text editor, forked from editors/gedit
Charlie Li wrote:
> The Cinnamon desktop environment now has its own collection of desktop
> applications, X-Apps, basically forked from their GNOME and MATE
> counterparts. The text editor, forked from editors/gedit (and will be
> repocopied from there when committed into our main svn
Hello, excuse me.
apache24 sometimes ignores OPTIONS and prefers the result of
apr-1-config and/or apu-1-config.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Hi,
You can remove categories by using the REFUSE argument in /etc/portsnap.conf .
See the manpage for portsnap.conf. Then obviously, run portsnap.
For other ports or package management tools, I don't remember clearly if or how
you can do this.
Something like:
REFUSE x11 irc games cad finance
Fernando Apesteguía writes:
> El sáb., 20 abr. 2019 10:27, Kubilay Kocak escribió:
>
>> On 20/04/2019 6:15 pm, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> > I've received a number of these messages. Based on the fact that they
>> > seem to be a jail mismatch, I assume that this has nothing to do with
>> >
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
