Re: devel/llvm80 requires many python 2.7 ports?

2019-07-25 Thread Kevin Oberman
Thanks, Brooks! Now if the package builder would use start using samba48 instead of 47, I'll be able to install the package. I'm really baffled why "LATEST" is still being built with a deprecated, nearly expired port almost two months after the default version was changed, but I'll admit to not

Re: devel/llvm80 requires many python 2.7 ports?

2019-07-25 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 02:57:29PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > I just went to build llvm80 after discovering that I could not install the > package without moving from the drfault samba48 back to the deprecated > samba47. > > When I try to build the port, I get: > Upgrade llvm80-8.0.0_2 to

devel/llvm80 requires many python 2.7 ports?

2019-07-25 Thread Kevin Oberman
I just went to build llvm80 after discovering that I could not install the package without moving from the drfault samba48 back to the deprecated samba47. When I try to build the port, I get: Upgrade llvm80-8.0.0_2 to llvm80-8.0.1 Install textproc/py-recommonmark@py27 Install

RE: Question for users and consumers of lang/mono and NuGet

2019-07-25 Thread driesm.michiels
> All; > > Since I work with Mono extensively at home and at work, I've been working > closely with the Mono Project folks to get things compiling and running much > more cleanly on FreeBSD. And I'm very happy to say that excellent progress > has been made including a number of patches upstream.

Latest packages being built with stale dependencies?

2019-07-25 Thread Kevin Oberman
Today I tried updating llvm80 to the newest version, 8.0.1, using pkg. I discovered that the package for llvm80 is built using the deprecated and soon to expire sambe47. Last week, in preparation for the expiry , I updated to samba48 and I assumed that any ports that were being packaged for

Re: make index produces 0 byte INDEX-11

2019-07-25 Thread Andy Farkas
On 25/07/2019 20:51, Matthew Seaman wrote: This is probably due to something in your environment -- I did a portmaster -o lang/perl5.28 lang/perl5.22 as per UPDATING. My INDEX-11 file now successfully builds. Sorry for the noise. -andyf ___

Re: make index produces 0 byte INDEX-11

2019-07-25 Thread Andy Farkas
On 25/07/2019 20:51, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 25/07/2019 10:42, Andy Farkas wrote: make_index: /usr/ports/archivers/atool: no entry for /usr/ports/:lang/perl5.26 Done. 1533.047u 907.912s 8:12.79 495.3%23786+867k 500780+163017io 13720pf+0w root:/usr/ports # ls -l INDEX-11 -rw-r--r-- 1

Re: make index produces 0 byte INDEX-11

2019-07-25 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 25/07/2019 10:42, Andy Farkas wrote: make_index: /usr/ports/archivers/atool: no entry for /usr/ports/:lang/perl5.26  Done. 1533.047u 907.912s 8:12.79 495.3%    23786+867k 500780+163017io 13720pf+0w root:/usr/ports # ls -l INDEX-11 -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  0 Jul 25 19:07 INDEX-11

make index produces 0 byte INDEX-11

2019-07-25 Thread Andy Farkas
Is it because of "no entry for /usr/ports/:lang/perl5.26" ? What would cause that? Something in my environment? Something buried in /usr/local? FreeBSD 11.3-STABLE #0 r350271 root:~ # cat /etc/make.conf #ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED_SYSTEM=1 #DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= perl5=5.22 WRKDIRPREFIX=/z/work root:~ #