Re: amd64->{armv7,aarc64} cross builds of devel/llvm10 (via poudriere-devel): failed in package stage for missing libarcher* files

2020-02-19 Thread Brooks Davis
Fixed in r526532. Thanks for the hint that it was in OPENMP. -- Brooks On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 08:19:26PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2020-Feb-17, at 09:56, Mark Millard wrote: > > > On 2020-Feb-17, at 09:53, Mark Millard wrote: > > > >> [The native arm64 build worked fine. But the cross

Committer request for textproc/sigil update

2020-02-19 Thread Jonathan Chen
Hi, Are there any committers available to take on a textproc/sigil update: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243965 It's just PORTVERSION and distinfo changes. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https:/

Re: Starting with poudriere

2020-02-19 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Jose Quinteiro wrote on 2020/02/19 20:35: On 2020-02-15 20:43, Dan McGrath wrote: Probably not ideal since you generally want to disable the FreeBSD repository, and use only your poudriere repo, instead. You would need to build everything you intend to install in the jail, however. While I bel

Re: Starting with poudriere

2020-02-19 Thread Jose Quinteiro
On 2020-02-15 20:43, Dan McGrath wrote: On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 11:03 PM @lbutlr wrote: Let’s say I want to build and install a single port via poudrier. For the same of argument some port that has configuration options I want to change. Probably not ideal since you generally want to disabl

Re: Notifying maintainers when their port is labeled BROKEN would make a difference

2020-02-19 Thread Jan Beich
Matthew Seaman writes: > On 18/02/2020 17:20, Yuri wrote: > >> Currently maintainers aren't notified when their ports are labeled broken. >> >> Adding broken ports to "Issues that need your attention" e-mails would >> make a difference. >> >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24