Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
Hello FreeBSD Ports,
This contribution [0] has been awaiting attention for about four weeks,
since 2020-02-01 22:20:44 UTC. Are there any friendly, neighborhood
committers who would be willing and available to take it?
[0] https://bugs.freebsd.org/243787
--
John W. O'Brien
OpenPGP keys:
On 01/03/2020 00:29, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Martin Neubauer wrote on 2020/02/29 23:44:
>>
>>
>> On 28/02/2020 17:20, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>>> I am using Poudriere for a long time. I switched to poudriere-devel few
>>> days ago because I want to test ports overlay.
>>> I run
>>>
Martin Neubauer wrote on 2020/02/29 23:44:
On 28/02/2020 17:20, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
I am using Poudriere for a long time. I switched to poudriere-devel few
days ago because I want to test ports overlay.
I run
poudriere options -z php71m103 -p default -f
On 28/02/2020 17:20, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> I am using Poudriere for a long time. I switched to poudriere-devel few
> days ago because I want to test ports overlay.
> I run
> poudriere options -z php71m103 -p default -f
> /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/pkglists/php71m103
> just to be sure
On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 14:30:14 -0500 Theron theron.tar...@gmail.com said
On 2020-02-29 14:44, Bob Eager wrote:
>make makeplist
>
> I believe
>
Indeed. A port may also provide its own definition of makeplist
(ideally preserving the /you/have/to/check/... nag) to make maintenance
easier, but
On 2020-02-29 14:44, Bob Eager wrote:
make makeplist
I believe
Indeed. A port may also provide its own definition of makeplist
(ideally preserving the /you/have/to/check/... nag) to make maintenance
easier, but any changes to resulting pkg-plist can still be easily seen
by version
On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 19:44:40 + Bob Eager r...@tavi.co.uk said
On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:29:18 -0800
Chris wrote:
> TMPPLIST is an artifact of the QA process when making a port. It is
> used for comparison to what you, as a port maintainer claim is the
> pkg-plist, and whats found that looks
On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:29:18 -0800
Chris wrote:
> TMPPLIST is an artifact of the QA process when making a port. It is
> used for comparison to what you, as a port maintainer claim is the
> pkg-plist, and whats found that looks as the actual plist. When a
> discrepancy occurs. You're warned, and
Robert Huff wrote on 2020/02/29 00:49:
I used to use azureus/vuze, but it hasn't been maintained is
quite a while.
So I changed to deluge ... which now has a dependency
semi-permanently BROKEN.
What can people recommend as a replacement?
I used uTurrent in Windows
On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:02:23 +0100 Mateusz Piotrowski 0...@freebsd.org said
On 2/29/20 12:15 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:06:19PM +0100, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
>> Do we have any (perhaps unwritten) policy for when to use TMPPLIST? And
> when
>> should a port
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 18:49:02 -0500
Robert Huff wrote:
> I used to use azureus/vuze, but it hasn't been maintained is
> quite a while.
I used azureus a long time ago, and liked it, but IIRC at the time it
didn't scale very well when managing many torrents and its java
dependencies were a
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 3:02 AM Mateusz Piotrowski <0...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> On 2/29/20 12:15 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:06:19PM +0100, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
> >> Do we have any (perhaps unwritten) policy for when to use TMPPLIST? And
> >> when
> >> should a
On 2/29/20 12:15 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:06:19PM +0100, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
Do we have any (perhaps unwritten) policy for when to use TMPPLIST? And when
should a port maintainer stick to pkg-plist?
We do not. A port maintainer should stick to pkg-plist.
> Am 28.02.2020 um 01:22 schrieb Tatsuki Makino :
>
> Your poudriere.conf is written as PARALLEL_JOBS=4.
> Combining this with writing MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER:=4 in
> /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/*make.conf, load average reaches 16.
> If you are concerned about that load average reaching 16, you need to
15 matches
Mail list logo
