Re: Which u-boot for rpi3? u-boot-rpi3-32 or the old one?

2020-06-16 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2020-Jun-16, at 22:21, bob prohaska wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 09:59:24PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >> >> >> On 2020-Jun-16, at 21:34, bob prohaska wrote: >> >>> Just noticed there are now two u-boot ports for the RPi3, one >>> called u-boot-rpi3-32 and (the presumably original) u-b

Re: Which u-boot for rpi3? u-boot-rpi3-32 or the old one?

2020-06-16 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:22 PM bob prohaska wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 09:59:24PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > > > > > On 2020-Jun-16, at 21:34, bob prohaska wrote: > > > > > Just noticed there are now two u-boot ports for the RPi3, one > > > called u-boot-rpi3-32 and (the presumably o

Re: Which u-boot for rpi3? u-boot-rpi3-32 or the old one?

2020-06-16 Thread bob prohaska
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 09:59:24PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > > On 2020-Jun-16, at 21:34, bob prohaska wrote: > > > Just noticed there are now two u-boot ports for the RPi3, one > > called u-boot-rpi3-32 and (the presumably original) u-boot-rpi3. > > > > The descriptions are equally bland,

Re: Which u-boot for rpi3? u-boot-rpi3-32 or the old one?

2020-06-16 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2020-Jun-16, at 21:34, bob prohaska wrote: > Just noticed there are now two u-boot ports for the RPi3, one > called u-boot-rpi3-32 and (the presumably original) u-boot-rpi3. > > The descriptions are equally bland, what's the difference? > The goal is to boot a recent snapshot of -current f

Which u-boot for rpi3? u-boot-rpi3-32 or the old one?

2020-06-16 Thread bob prohaska
Just noticed there are now two u-boot ports for the RPi3, one called u-boot-rpi3-32 and (the presumably original) u-boot-rpi3. The descriptions are equally bland, what's the difference? The goal is to boot a recent snapshot of -current from USB using a Pi3b (no +). Now it's suffering from cpu_rese

Re: Lsof port can't build (again)

2020-06-16 Thread @lbutlr
On 16 Jun 2020, at 21:14, George Mitchell wrote: > On 2020-06-16 23:12, George Mitchell wrote: >> On 2020-06-16 23:10, @lbutlr wrote: >>> [...] >>> Needless to say, I was expecting that checkout would give me 12.1, but I >>> don't see how to get that. > Pardon the typo: > > https://svn.freebsd

Re: Lsof port can't build (again)

2020-06-16 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 15:11, @lbutlr wrote: > > On 16 Jun 2020, at 06:40, Mike Bristow wrote: > > What is the output of "egrep '^(TYPE|REVISION|BRANCH)' > > /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh" ? > > Well, this seems like it might be bad: > > # egrep '^(TYPE|REVISION|BRANCH)' /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers

Re: Lsof port can't build (again)

2020-06-16 Thread @lbutlr
On 16 Jun 2020, at 06:40, Mike Bristow wrote: > What is the output of "egrep '^(TYPE|REVISION|BRANCH)' > /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh" ? Well, this seems like it might be bad: # egrep '^(TYPE|REVISION|BRANCH)' /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh TYPE="FreeBSD" REVISION="13.0" BRANCH=${BRANCH_OVERRIDE:

Fwd: unifi5, mongodb and python2

2020-06-16 Thread Ronald Klop
Hi, Looking for some feedback on this. Or should I just go ahead and create PRs? Ronald. Van: Ronald Klop Datum: vrijdag, 12 juni 2020 11:08 Aan: f...@freebsd.org Onderwerp: unifi5, mongodb and python2 Hi, Currently unifi5 uses mongodb36. Mongodb36 and mongodb40 are marked as deprecated be

general R4I on ports

2020-06-16 Thread Donald Wilde
Folks, Not to start a flame war, but I've had a few issues in the ports tree, as STABLE readers have no doubt seen. This is a Request for Insights. IMHO, it's a black hole to stay current with ports designed to utilize GNU tools, especially documentation tools. I realize that given the complexi

Re: might need to bump version of python ports after recent openssl changes

2020-06-16 Thread Kirill Ponomarev
On 05/27, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 11:31:32PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 11:09 PM Stefan Eßer wrote: > > > > > Am 27.05.20 um 04:24 schrieb Jan Beich: > > > > Pete Wright writes: > > > > > > > >> hello - on current i found myself in a situ

Re: Lsof port can't build (again)

2020-06-16 Thread LuKreme
On Jun 16, 2020, at 06:41, Mike Bristow wrote: > > That is not present in the file on relent/12.1, which is probably the same as > yours. I suspect that you have an out-of-date /usr/src. I just installed the source, and ran the svn update just in case. > (This does beg the question of why yo

Re: Lsof port can't build (again)

2020-06-16 Thread Mike Bristow
Hi, On 15/06/2020 02:52, @lbutlr wrote: When trying to update lsof on FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE-p5 GENERIC i386 I get the following fatal error: /usr/src/sys/sys/pcpu.h:224:10: fatal error: 'machine/pcpu_aux.h' file not found #include ^~~~ That is not present in the fi

Re: cups-pdf crash status -139

2020-06-16 Thread Michael Gmelin
> On 16. Jun 2020, at 11:47, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > > On 2020-06-15 16:14, Michael Gmelin wrote: >>> On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:03:17 +0200 >>> Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >>> On 2020-06-15 09:50, Michael Gmelin wrote: > On 15. Jun 2020, at 09:45, Per olof Ljungmark > wr

Re: cups-pdf crash status -139

2020-06-16 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
On 2020-06-15 16:14, Michael Gmelin wrote: On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:03:17 +0200 Per olof Ljungmark wrote: On 2020-06-15 09:50, Michael Gmelin wrote: On 15. Jun 2020, at 09:45, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: What happens if you run the gs command on the pdf you’re printing directly:

Re: FreeBSD Port: baikal-0.6.1

2020-06-16 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On Jun 15 2020, 21:47 UTC, Jim - OPP wrote: Are there any plans to update the port to version 0.7.0 in the bear future? The current port is requiring PHP 7.2 which ended active support in Nov 2019 and ends security only fixes in just over 5 months. The newest version has added support for PH

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2020-06-16 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: FreeBSD Port: phabricator-php73-20200514_1

2020-06-16 Thread Michael Gmelin
> On 16. Jun 2020, at 08:41, Fabian Abplanalp - Legatech GmbH > wrote: > > Hi > > Since we updated the Port to 20200514_1 we can't create milestones anymore > with the following information... Is there anything known about that problem > or should we place a bugreport at phabricator? > >