Tatsuki Makino wrote:
> -U default value can be changed in ${LOCALBASE}/etc/poudriere.conf, cannot it?
> The default value is defined in common.sh.
>
> GIT_PORTSURL="git.FreeBSD.org/ports.git"
> And
> poudriere ports -c -m git+https -B main
>
Yes, you can put GIT_PORTSURL into poudriere.conf and
[The original send attempt for this failed somehow.]
Eric Turgeon ericbsd at freebsd.org wrote on
Mon Apr 5 20:33:22 UTC 2021 :
> Today when trying to sync the GhostBSD ports tree with the FreeBSD ports
> tree, I found out the main branch history is not compatible with the old
> GitHub master.
>
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote on 2021/04/06 06:37:
> poudriere ports -c -B main -m git -U 'https://git.FreeBSD.org/ports.git' -p
> freebsd
>
-U default value can be changed in ${LOCALBASE}/etc/poudriere.conf, cannot it?
The default value is defined in common.sh.
GIT_PORTSURL="git.FreeBSD.
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 05:33:08PM -0300, Eric Turgeon wrote:
> Today when trying to sync the GhostBSD ports tree with the FreeBSD ports
> tree, I found out the main branch history is not compatible with the old
> GitHub master.
>
> Any plan to migrate to main with hold git history as we had with
On 05/04/21 23:26, Jose Quinteiro wrote:
On 4/4/21 7:35 AM, Carmel wrote:
On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 12:18:27 +, Rene Ladan stated:
...
Is or will poudriere default to using net/gitup in FreeBSD 13? Is there
a way to configure it in the "poudriere.conf" file?
There's a "git" option for the "-m me
On 4/4/21 7:35 AM, Carmel wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 12:18:27 +, Rene Ladan stated:
> ...
> Is or will poudriere default to using net/gitup in FreeBSD 13? Is there
> a way to configure it in the "poudriere.conf" file?
>
There's a "git" option for the "-m method" command-line switch of
poudri
Today when trying to sync the GhostBSD ports tree with the FreeBSD ports
tree, I found out the main branch history is not compatible with the old
GitHub master.
Any plan to migrate to main with hold git history as we had with
freebsd-src?
*Eric TurgeonFreeBSD ports committer*
www.freebsd.org
_
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 05:15:32AM +0900, Tatsuki Makino wrote:
> bob prohaska wrote on 2021/04/06 03:03:
> > When trying to compile www/chromium on an 8GB Pi4 using
> > make -j4 -DBATCH MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes >
> > make.log &
>
> The ports go wrong if you use -j 4 for m
bob prohaska wrote on 2021/04/06 03:03:
> When trying to compile www/chromium on an 8GB Pi4 using
> make -j4 -DBATCH MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes > make.log &
The ports go wrong if you use -j 4 for make.
The value can be adjusted with MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=4 , etc.
When trying to compile www/chromium on an 8GB Pi4 using
make -j4 -DBATCH MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes > make.log &
the process stopped with
===> Registering installation for bash-5.1.4_1 as automatic
pkg-static: open(/home/bob/freebsd-ports/shells/bash/work/.metadir): No such
Maybe the second machine is up to date.
Or do you mean that gitup does not exit but keeps waiting forever?
Regards,
Ronald
Van: "@lbutlr"
Datum: 5 april 2021 18:49
Aan: FreeBSD
Onderwerp: gitup on two machines
I have tow machines, both on 12.2-RELEASE
Running `gitup ports` on one
I have tow machines, both on 12.2-RELEASE
Running `gitup ports` on one server updates the ports tree. Running the the
same command with the same configuration (pointing at the GitHub mirror in both
cases) just sits there with no feedback and does nothing, even if I run it with
a -v 2 flag.
On 04 Apr 2021, at 10:46, Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports
wrote:
> running 12.2 STABLE,
Curious, why are you not running the RELEASE version of 12.2?
--
"Are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
"I think so, Brain. But Trojans won’t arrive on the scene for another
300 years."
Hello,
I am trying to port cmucl to RPI4-B RELEASE-13.0-RC3 (arm64-aarch64), but of
course I can't as port's and host's architectures are different.
Any method for cross-building/compiling this port? or any other port?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org m
https://cgit.freebsd.org/ shows:
QUOTE
NameDescription IdleLinks
development
doc FreeBSD documentation tree 16 hourssummarylogtree
ports FreeBSD ports tree 57 min. summarylogtree
src FreeBSD source tree 3 days summarylogtree
END QUOTE
https://wiki.fre
On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 10:35:25AM -0400, Carmel wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 12:18:27 +, Rene Ladan stated:
> >On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 07:43:49AM -0400, Carmel wrote:
> >> I am using "poudriere-devel", version 3.3.99.20210303_1 on a FreeBSD
> >> 11.4-RELEASE-p8 amd64 machine. I was told that po
Thanks Makino!
It makes sense and my investigation is over :)
Thanks,
Nuno Teixeira
Tatsuki Makino escreveu no dia segunda,
5/04/2021 à(s) 05:25:
> probably
>
> "releng/12.2" branch: Thu Sep 10 23:56:59 2020 UTC
> Add gitup 0.87: Tue Dec 29 12:53:20 2020 UTC
>
>
__
18 matches
Mail list logo
