Re: 10.0-CUR r226986 && ports (general)

2011-11-03 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Nov 3 11, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Thursday, November 03, 2011 a las 11:28:47AM +0000, Alexander Best > escribió: > > > > It turns out that the problem is more general! A lot of ./configure > > > scripts are detecting in 10-CUR that they can't or sh

Re: 10.0-CUR r226986 && ports (general)

2011-11-03 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Nov 3 11, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Wednesday, November 02, 2011 a las 08:36:07PM +0100, Matthias Apitz > escribió: > > > > > Hello, > > > > I fetched 10-CUR from SVN as r226986 and /usr/ports from CVS on November > > 1st; > > > > The ports/audio/jack seems installing fine, but th

Re: CFT Chromium 15.0.874.92

2011-10-18 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Oct 18 11, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Alexander Best wrote on 18.10.2011 19:28: > >On Tue Oct 18 11, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > >>George Liaskos wrote on 18.10.2011 17:22: > >>>>Yes, all is fine here. And i didn't used libtool-fixed and UNAME_r hack

Re: CFT Chromium 15.0.874.92

2011-10-18 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Oct 18 11, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > George Liaskos wrote on 18.10.2011 17:22: > >>Yes, all is fine here. And i didn't used libtool-fixed and UNAME_r hack > >>for > >>building. Using stock gcc and default options (CODECS,GCONF). > > > >Chromium does not need any hack to compile, what i d

Re: CFT Chromium 15.0.874.92

2011-10-18 Thread Alexander Best
On Sun Oct 16 11, George Liaskos wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 5:34 PM, George Liaskos wrote: > > Hello, > > > > http://cybertron.gr/chromium-20111016.tar.xz > > http://cybertron.gr/chromium-15.0.874.92.tbz > > > > Meh, sorry about that. I pushed send by mistake. > > What i meant to write was

Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-14 Thread Alexander Best
On Sun Aug 14 11, Olivier Smedts wrote: > 2011/8/14 Alexander Best : > > On Sun Aug 14 11, Niclas Zeising wrote: > >> On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote: > >> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > >> >> On 08/13/11 09:26

Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.

2011-08-14 Thread Alexander Best
On Sun Aug 14 11, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > >> On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote: > >>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith

Re: /lib/libz.so version bump prevents java/jdk1* from upgrading

2009-09-10 Thread Alexander Best
submitted a PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=138706 thanks everybody. alex Wesley Shields schrieb am 2009-09-10: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 03:10:17PM +0200, Alexander Best wrote: > > thanks for the hint. i was actually aware of this thread and the > > way > >

Re: /lib/libz.so version bump prevents java/jdk1* from upgrading

2009-09-10 Thread Alexander Best
heers. alex Maciej Suszko schrieb am 2009-09-10: > Alexander Best wrote: > > hi there, > > it would be nice to have a note in UPDATING on how to rebuild an > > installed java/jdk1* under >= 8. since java/jdk1* requires an > > installed java environment in order to build i

/lib/libz.so version bump prevents java/jdk1* from upgrading

2009-09-10 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, it would be nice to have a note in UPDATING on how to rebuild an installed java/jdk1* under >= 8. since java/jdk1* requires an installed java environment in order to build it fails due to the version bump of /lib/libz.so.4 to /lib/libz.so.5 to be able to rebuild any installed java/jdk1*

Re: CFT - ioquake3 1.36 port

2009-09-09 Thread Alexander Best
tried to grab the patches but the connection to the server times out. alex ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

`portsclean -C` tripping over noschg flag

2009-09-09 Thread Alexander Best
i don't know if this is a known problem or not. i searched the PR database but couldn't find anything: certain ports apply flags (noschg e.g.) not during installation but right away in their working directory. misc/compat4x is one example. when doing "make clean" the working directory gets deleted