On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Johan Hendriks <joh.hendr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> Op 06/12/2017 om 10:53 schreef Mathieu Arnold:
> > Le 05/12/2017 à 23:25, Baho Utot a écrit :
> >>
> >> On 12/05/17 17:09, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> >>> Le 05/12/
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Jonathan Chen <j...@chen.org.nz> wrote:
> On 5 December 2017 at 22:53, Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.fried...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> [...]
> > 2. I installed synth (2.00) and *ATTEMPTED* to do a upgrade-system with
> the
> > following
First some background (my typical use cases for ports):
0. FreeBSD lilith 11.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE #0 r321664: Fri Jul 28
23:35:18 EDT 2017 root@lilith:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
1. Daily routine (current):
cd /usr/src
svn update (from 11.1-RELEASE)
[make
When I boot I get a lot of junk messages (hints about how to configure it)
form sysutils/automount while I want to keep automount in the startup I
want to suppress these messages -- how?
Note without both settings below it does not automount my flash drive
(da4)... also coping
I have port I maintain that compiles fine under GCC 5 (or lower) but barfs
on GCC 6. A small modification will make it compile under 6 but the very
same modification makes it incompatible with 5. What is the best way to
handle this and still allow USE_GCC=any ?
--
Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead
org>
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 08:08:28PM -0500, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> > FreeBSD rain 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #93 r314227: Fri Feb 24
> > 13:51:55 EST 2017 root@rain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
> >
> >
> > ===> Fetching all distfi
FreeBSD rain 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #93 r314227: Fri Feb 24
13:51:55 EST 2017 root@rain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
===> Fetching all distfiles required by pkgconf-1.3.0 for building
===> Extracting for pkgconf-1.3.0
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for pkgconf-1.3.0.tar.xz.
===>
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Jochen Neumeister
wrote:
> There is an open PR for this Problem: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzi
> lla/show_bug.cgi?id=217024
>
>
An interesting hint is it built and installed correctly on a an other
machine with the same updates but does not
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Kevin Oberman <rkober...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.fried...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa <
>> rak...@freebsd.org>
>&g
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa <rak...@freebsd.org>
wrote:
> Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.fried...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > After upgrading deval/dbus to dbus-1.10.12 xfce4 fails to start as a
> > non-root user due to being unable to open/write
After upgrading deval/dbus to dbus-1.10.12 xfce4 fails to start as a
non-root user due to being unable to open/write to /etc/machine-id. I
made a tempurary fix by touching /etc/machine-id and chmod'ing it to 777.
--
Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org
On FreeBSD lilith 10.3-STABLE FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #0 r307694: Fri Oct 21
00:10:20 EDT 2016 root@lilith:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
In order to install java/openjdk8 and devel/subversion I had to install the
following as packages instead of compiling it from source also make world
also
I have the following line in my pkg-install:
pw groupmod wheel -m www
The reason is I have files that are created by a user account that also
gets made but are modified using it or tomcat... these particular files are
shell scripts that must run as root (they are for controlling bhyve and
other
, Lars Engels l...@freebsd.org wrote:
Am 2014-01-25 05:30, schrieb Aryeh Friedman:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.org
wrote:
(maybe there is some great ports system that I'm not aware of that makes
this all as easy github, but I somehow doubt
Perlstein wrote:
On 1/25/14 3:48 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote:
On 01/25/2014 14:44, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
The key seems to be that no one has time to do the stuff they really
want
to do (get new ports into the system)... to that end
progress with their newness when in fact they are reinvinting the wheel
for the 15th time
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On 1/26/14 10:21 AM, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
just do us a favor and do not assume newer means better...
I've been using newer almost
Forgot to mention and aegis in almost every case implements the very same
features in a much smoother way (no stupid http bs or anything)
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.comwrote:
If it is so new then why when I looked into git and git hub for the first
)
If aegis is so much better then we should use it. Or everyone should use
it... but why isn't everyone using it?
Simple reason Peter Miller (the author of aegis/cook) for whatever reason
*NEVER* tried to market his stuff while GIT made a specific effort of
attempting to get outside users.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.orgwrote:
I'm not addicted to newness. I think you just hate anything that is
popular and you're butthurt that something that's may have been ahead of
it's time was missed out on. This is no reason to dig your heels in and
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.orgwrote:
I'm not sure, I'm going to go load up healthcare.gov to see if I can
order myself some free aspirin after this discussion.
At least my build system has never caused me to need an aspirin (normal
debugging is bad
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On 1/26/14, 10:56 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.orgwrote:
I'm not sure, I'm going to go load up healthcare.gov to see if I can
order myself some free
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote:
On 01/24/2014 20:16, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
(maybe there is some great ports system that I'm not aware of that makes
this all as easy github, but I somehow doubt that.)
github itself is closed source, but 95% of its functionality
By the way, this wasn't about switching to git (although that would be
nice), this is about leveraging existing tools.
One can very easily use git-svn bridge to push git changes into
subversion. Or you can try to re-implement a patch queue based system
yourself using a bunch of duct tape and
Making proper merge from github pull request it not that easy, you will
need to
fetch pull request as custom branches and cherry-pick them. That is really
not
convenient.
devel/tailor was designed specifically for this case (the actual case it
does is aegis --- svn) but same basic idea
--
-- Forwarded message --
From: Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?
To: John Marino dragonfly...@marino.st
You are solving the wrong problem.
And nobody is reinventing
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote:
On 01/25/2014 05:43, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
With the scripts it should be possible to fetch the patch of a PR, apply
and commit it to your redports repository and do additional changes until
you are okay with it. What is still
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote:
On 01/25/2014 14:44, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
The key seems to be that no one has time to do the stuff they really want
to do (get new ports into the system)... to that end automating everything
that can be automated is sure help free
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On 1/25/14 3:48 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote:
On 01/25/2014 14:44, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
The key seems to be that no one has time to do the stuff they really
I never said our selves it is outsourced to the developer/maintainer with
100% automated stuff... once I am doing with the next small version of
petitecloud I will post the 6 line script we use to test the port
(including cranking up a few vm's)... have fun doing that anywhere else
Got bored
I like the KISS approach myself. This can be boiled down to those two
issues, one of which is a symptom of the other. Arguing and debating over a
long term solution to the OP's question does nothing to solve the problem
in the short to intermediate term. There are 1680 current ports related
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Big Lebowski spankthes...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi everyone,
I wanted to ask about the growing time of reaction to ports PR's - what is
the problem? It seems to me, as a ports contributor, that this time is only
growing, not shrinking, and there's no
I think you've got me wrong - I am following freebsd-virtualization list
very closely, and the matter I've touched here is not my doubt on which
technology I should use, but rather a complaint on the state of jails
related tools directly leading to the delays in handling of ports related
I would be willing to help write some scripts to start/stop the VM's
(PetiteCloud does a command line that will be better documented and such in
the next version or two)
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Big Lebowski spankthes...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Aryeh
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.orgwrote:
(maybe there is some great ports system that I'm not aware of that makes
this all as easy github, but I somehow doubt that.)
Nice to be able to plug something other then petitecloud as a possible
solution to this...
I submitted ports/185362 and ports/185361 over a week ago and I have heard
nothing but automated replies so far.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Only in that a earlier version I submitted last fall (which needed to be
reworked) got looked at in 2 days...
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:18 PM, John Marino freebsd.cont...@marino.stwrote:
On 1/13/2014 23:05, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I submitted ports/185362 and ports/185361 over a week ago and I
right now I have:
post-install:
pw lock user
under staging this is now called before the user is made what target should
I move this to?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
What has replaced it and where is it documented? (our port is for 10+
[requires bhyve])
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Tijl Coosemans t...@coosemans.org wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 01:05:15 +0100 Julien Laffaye wrote:
On 11/10/2013 12:47 AM, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
Where would I find
post-install is now called *BEFORE* users are created (before staging was
added it was after)... looking at bsd.port.mk there seems no reasonable
target that replaces post-install for this purpose. Namely I need to lock
the user account that was created and assign a default password to it.
This
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 2:59 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2013-11-10 20:40, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
post-install is now called *BEFORE* users are created (before staging was
added it was after)... looking at bsd.port.mk there seems no reasonable
target that replaces post-install
Where would I find a complete list of @'s allowed in pkg-plist and
hopefully an explination of each one? (the porter's handbook is incomplete)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
Forgot to mention the solution should if at all possible be 100%
pkg-plist
based because our internal build system is not make
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am doing a lot of inter-machine testing of a private port
I am doing a lot of inter-machine testing of a private port (will be
released soon as a actual port) but need to tell make deinstall not to
delete a certain file... how do we do this?... background one thing we are
testing is the ability to upgrade the port (privately) and it must not nuke
our
Forgot to mention the solution should if at all possible be 100% pkg-plist
based because our internal build system is not make
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 5:21 AM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.comwrote:
I am doing a lot of inter-machine testing of a private port (will be
released soon
Where is this documented? (I am making a port that needs do similar stuff
but want to understand all the possible directives)
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Tijl Coosemans t...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, 3 Nov 2013 22:22:24 +0100 (CET) Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
On Sun, 3 Nov 2013, Tijl
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
Please do not top post: it makes it impossible to follow a conversation.
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com
wrote:
Where is this documented? (I am making a port that needs do similar
Doing this disables the user creation part of the port
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Boris Samorodov b...@passap.ru wrote:
05.10.2013 08:29, Aryeh Friedman пишет:
I maintain a port (not officially a part of the ports collection yet)
that
compiled just fine before staging support
I maintain a port (not officially a part of the ports collection yet) that
compiled just fine before staging support was added now I get:
chown -R www:www /usr/local/etc/petitecloud
Compressing man pages
=== Correct pkg-plist sequence to create group(s) and user(s)
=== Installing for
I have a port that has a very serious security flaw (no password required
for super user level privileges) and in the fix I want to force the
uninstalling of all previously installed versions (for obvious reasons)...
how do I go about doing this... please note I am also the author of the
ported
I accidentally left a copyright notice in the Makefile of ports/182056 how
do I make a followup to it to fix the problem? A side question the PR has
been sitting for over a week with no one assigned to it?
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Aryeh M. Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com
wrote:
, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
related questions:
1. How do I add the user to wheel (has it's own group but needs to be in
wheel for reason number #2)?
2. How do I modify (in the safest possible way) an other port's installed
config file(s) (namely I need to in the case of this port modify
/usr/local/etc
I have a port that needs to create a a user of a given name and a given
default password... I found in the porters guide how to make the account
but not set the password
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
What is the best way to submit 4 or 5 ports at once (I have all the port
files themselves stored on the same site that the distfiles are on and
contain the same general pattern of ftp:://site.com/XXX/port-0.1.tar.gz)...
so I do it one PR per port with the standard subject for a new port or a
I am making a port and need to see a good working example of how to
make it so it will not compile on less then 10-CURRENT
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
I am attempting to put together a port for a new program and I am
getting a very odd error message (i.e. it says the port conflicts with
itself!?!?!?!):
pkg-static: foo-0.1 conflicts with foo-0.1 (installs files into the
same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/share/foo/foo.jar
What causes
-- Forwarded message --
From: Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 1:12 PM
Subject: help with making a port
To: FreeBSD Ports ML freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
I am attempting to put together a port for a new program and I am
getting a very odd error
GMail is being weird this is a 3rd try at reposting
-- Forwarded message --
From: Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 1:12 PM
Subject: help with making a port
To: FreeBSD Ports ML freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
I am attempting to put together a port
, Jul 7, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Jason Helfman j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am attempting to put together a port for a new program and I am
getting a very odd error message (i.e. it says the port conflicts with
itself
oops forgot the pkg-plist:
share/foo/foo.jar
etc/rc.d/foo
etc/foo/instances
apache-tomcat-7.0/webapps/foo.war
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote:
It uses a non-standard build system (devel/cook) but here is the
Makefile for the port itself
Looking in /var/db/pkg and /var/db/ports I see nothing... anywhere else to look?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Jason Helfman j...@freebsd.org wrote:
pkg which /path/to/file
or
pkg_info -W /path/to/file
Odd though that you checked there, and it wasn't recorded
aryeh@dev:/home/aryeh% pkg_info -W /usr/local/share/foo/foo.jar
pkg_info: You appear to be using the newer
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.comwrote:
See subject for the main question... the details: I am the maintainer of
devel/aegis and the final installation step typically (linux RPM's for
example) is to create a user to hold the baselines (in svn/cvs/csup
See subject for the main question... the details: I am the maintainer of
devel/aegis and the final installation step typically (linux RPM's for
example) is to create a user to hold the baselines (in svn/cvs/csup speak
the project's repo) of the varioous projects managed by aegis... customerly
this
Some time in the last 2 weeks (I am sure when) a commit caused many
ports that assume a standard utmp/utmp.x to break for example
x11-toolkits/vte produces:
gnome-pty-helper.c:497: warning: passing argument 4 of 'pty_add'
discards qualifiers from pointer target type
mv -f
No will do even though I don't think I have a complete enough list of
ports to make a proper report (if in fact it is a per port solution
vs. fixing base)
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried
cvs update: cannot create read lock in repository
//
cvs checkout: Updating ports/sysutils/dolly/files///
cvs checkout: Updating ports/sysutils/dolly/files
cvs checkout: Updating ports/sysutils/dolly/files/
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Yuri Pankov yuri.pan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:22:38AM -0500, Aryeh Friedman
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Wesley Shields w...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:35:02AM -0500, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
This is from a repo that was updated 15 mins ago:
flosoft-stable# cvs co ports/sysutils/dolly | more
cvs checkout: Updating ports/sysutils/dolly
cvs
Menus are not appearing either
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
% pkg_info -Ix hicolor
hicolor-icon-theme-0.12 A high-color icon theme shell from the
FreeDesktop
project
Are you installed
Using the xinitrc that Oliver listed fixed the menus but not the icons for me
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen tin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Olivier Duchateau
duchateau.oliv...@gmail.com wrote:
Myself I copy xinitrc file taken from
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote:
Oliver --
There have been a number of reports from various people of
xfce-4.8 being broken... the main issues seem to be:
1. Icon's are missing
2. Application menu
Oliver --
There have been a number of reports from various people of
xfce-4.8 being broken... the main issues seem to be:
1. Icon's are missing
2. Application menu is not available
3. Terminal does not do any short of ANSI colors
Some
you copy it $HOME/.xsession or $HOME/.xinitrc depending if you start
from xdm or command line
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen tin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Aryeh Friedman
aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote:
Using the xinitrc that Oliver listed
All I know is once I copied it to .xsession it worked fine from xdm
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen tin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Aryeh Friedman
aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote:
you copy it $HOME/.xsession or $HOME/.xinitrc depending if you start
A few minor icons on panel 2 are missing but everuthing else is there
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen tin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello hello,
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Aryeh Friedman
aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote:
All I know is once I copied it to .xsession it worked
I had to reinstall all my ports from scratch to fix this... for how to
do this safely see the last example of the man page for portmaster
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Scott T. Hildreth sh...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
I updated my server to 8.2 and then all my ports. When compiling orage
or
Create a port for the build system and when you submit the update for
the new port also submit the one for the build system
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 5:42 PM, matt donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I come across a few applications that don't use imake, gmake, or a
configure script. How do I
I can confirm on 8-CURRENT no combination of GCC/enigmail/thinderbird
works... don't know about 7
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Alex Dupre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xin LI wrote:
Finally I caught the issue for thunderbird. It was due to the
difference between our floating point handling
I need to determine which ports depend directly (i.e. they have it
listed as a B/RDEPS). The specfic task I am working on right now
(but this will need to be more general later) is attempting to find
all the direct childern of libtool15
___
On 1/3/08, Frank J. Laszlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I need to determine which ports depend directly (i.e. they have it
listed as a B/RDEPS). The specfic task I am working on right now
(but this will need to be more general later) is attempting to find
all
On 1/3/08, Frank J. Laszlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
On 1/3/08, Frank J. Laszlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I need to determine which ports depend directly (i.e. they have it
listed as a B/RDEPS). The specfic task I am working on right now
On 1/3/08, Frank J. Laszlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
On 1/3/08, Frank J. Laszlo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I need to determine which ports depend directly (i.e. they have it
listed as a B/RDEPS). The specfic task I am working on right now
Having said that dependencies often do depend on the order the leaves
are installed, because some ports will use alternate dependencies
according to what's already there. It makes things a lot easier to
maintain.
___
btw xdm is not the worst
not sure why it reported an install issue (even after deinstalling gimp
and gimp-gnutlprint) both install fine after the deinstall
portupgrade -a after the manual install fixed this one... all that is
left is the lsof and mono problems above
--
Aryeh M. Friedman
FloSoft Systems
The new vm code in the kernel (cvsup) seems to have helped some things
in this combination. Neither nv or nvidia will recognize my 5200 GT;
but vesa now gives me 24 depth and has noticeably better response
time.
For the people who are having problems with spontanous reboots some
progress *MAY*
model was as a member of the SIW community and not as a owner
of a company that practices it.
On 9/24/07, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 23 September 2007 18:41:43 Aryeh Friedman wrote:
On 9/24/07, Michael Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
many people feel much differently
On 9/24/07, Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 24 September 2007 21:14:03 falz wrote:
I came across this thread on freebsd-questions after some searching on
google. I have the exact same issue as others here- if xorg is started
with 'nvidia' as the driver, instant reboot. However, my
My company develops software under a commercial open source (see
links for details) and I want to know if my license is close enough to
open source (see links for why it is not 100% OSD compliant [it is 95%
compliant]). Specifically does the business model as outlined in my
blog (the third
not just try the mysql dual
license model, it seems less tricky-dicky
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
Is that based on gut feeling or a study of the links offered?
--Aryeh
On 9/23/07, Michael Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no matter how hard you try, you can't take your sow's ear and turn
On 9/24/07, Michael Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
many people feel much differently, why not just a pure proprietary license
then, rather than proliferating Yet Another Silly License which is not
tempered by sound legal analysis.
Not to be insulting but I don't think you read my 1st blog
SIW [I came to it
in a different route])
http://www.methodsandtools.com/PDF/mt200402.pdf (detailed theoretical
examination of Jahia's business model)
--Aryeh
On 9/24/07, Michael Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
great, then why open the conversation up to plebs like me?
Aryeh Friedman wrote
91 matches
Mail list logo