Today, I discovered by accident that having setuid option set on
xorg-server -- which is the default option -- may be dangerous. (I guess
you all knew that already :-).
Another logged in user "killed" my screen by typing:
X :1
After turning setuid off, this denial of service attack was not possi
On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 23:52 +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on 11.09.2011 23:50:
> >
> > We will see that anyway - when user will try to extract changed
> > distfile, he will get warning about incorrect checksum, so this is not
> > the case, i believe.
>
> s/warning/e
>Sure it worth. From my POV, maintainer should be avoided the pleasure to
> mess with selfhosted and selfpackaged tarballs as much as possible.
> Besides of inconvenience it also less reliable (both in availability and
> security aspects).
>
> > I'm perfectly happy to mirror anything if needed,
On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 12:00 +, freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org
wrote:
> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 20:35:16 +0200
> From: Nikola Le?i?
> Subject: [Announcement] TeX Live 2011: Extended FreeBSD support
> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
> Message-ID: <201107221551.p6mfpb1t014...@anthesphoria.net>
>
I don't think that you loose your data, as it is stored in the pgsql
database which is not replaced by the package.
Anyhow, it is always good to have a backup.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
Actually, it was worth waiting a bit because there was a big bug with
generic agent. There has been released a new third release in short time
yesterday to fix it finally.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
The best thing you can do is to try to create an update of this port by
yourself and then submit the respective patch as a PR. Creating a port
update is usually not that hard. Why not give it a try? You'll find more
documentations in the Porter's Handbook.
_
I am trying to update the devel/clanlib port to the latest version when
running into this problem.
The patch for unix_socket.cpp looks like this:
==
if (enable && timeout != 0 && interval != 0)
{
- setsockopt(handle, SOL_TCP, T
use svn repositories in bazaar (depends on the
additional new port subvertpy) (ports/147166 and misc/147167)
Please test and enjoy.
C-S
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send
Hi everybody,
A couple of months ago, I sent a patch to update misc/tellico but never
got any reaction from its maintainer. Could somebody please have a look.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=142191
many thanks,
C-S
___
freebsd-ports
I am trying to create a new port from a distfile in sourceforge. My problem
is that the download link has a space and brackets which do not seem to
work. What I am doing wrong?
Here is the supposed part of Makefile:
PORTNAME= traveling_salesman
PORTVERSION=1.0.2
PORTEPOCH= 1
CATE
11 matches
Mail list logo
