Re: www/lighttpd failes to build

2011-12-19 Thread Chris Brennan
port was enough for the port to actually build, thank you. > -- > Chris Brennan > A: Yes. > >Q: Are you sure? > >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? > http://xkcd.com/84/ | http://xkcd.com

www/lighttpd failes to build

2011-12-11 Thread Chris Brennan
9s user 0m11.980s sys 0m7.193s [root@abc /usr/ports/www/lighttpd]# When I asked about this on freenode, I was instructed to e-mail ports and the maintainer, so I am. > -- > Chris Brennan > A: Yes. > >Q: Are you sure? > >>A: Because it reverses the logical fl

Re: Standalone mksh

2011-09-09 Thread Chris Brennan
t got filtered out by the list. -- > Chris Brennan > -- > A: Yes. > >Q: Are you sure? > >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? > http://xkcd.com/84/ | http://xkcd.com/149/ | http://xkcd.com/549/ &g

Re: MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE: how do *you* handle it?

2011-08-29 Thread Chris Brennan
lation and the script I had written to fetch updated apps broke because I couldn't figure out how to handle these new url's. It would see SF's idea of a direct link is a redirect, thus obfuscating the real servers even more and the path the project is in -- > Chris Brennan -

Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated?

2011-07-26 Thread Chris Brennan
peal to our key demographic. > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" +1 just because the thoug