The issue noted in
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-September/078439.html
also bites if one is using Dovecot SASL.
--
Harlan Stenn
http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member!
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Chris Rees writes:
> On 6 Sep 2012 05:57, "Cy Schubert" wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm considering a -devel port which checks out from our upline's VCS
>> repo, also generating a dynamic plist. I'm sure this is possible. Are
>> there any examples of this?
>
> It's possible, but you can't then do
that patch will actually fix the problem or not, or
when that PR will be resolved.
Should I just wait quietly, or is there a minimally-intrusive way I
could figure out the timeline on these things?
--
Harlan Stenn
http://ntpforum.isc.org - be a m
I have been noticing that when I run 'portupgrade -Ppa' (or reasonable
variants thereof) on a system that contains:
/etc/make.conf:
...
DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER= 41
WANT_MYSQL_VER= 41
WITH_MYSQL_VER= 41
(I used to just use DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER=41 and that didn't seem to be
enough.
[Please keep me in the Cc: line]
I have a couple of machines I have been upgrading over time using cvsup
and portupgrade.
On one machine that was running apache2 and php4, Something happend and
portupgrade on that machine now wants to install both php4 and php5, and
I'm seeing a package conflict
Thanks Bill,
> Using portupgrade's -o option, you can replace on port with another.
> For example:
> portupgrade -o www/apache22 apache
>
> Will replace whatever version of apache you've got installed with
> Apache-2.2, including rearranging any required dependencies so they
> point to the new po
Bill,
> > Will this "keep" across a "make update", or do I need to re-do it every
> > time I update /usr/ports?
>
> I'm not familiar with using "make update" and I don't see any info on
> it in man ports.
I run "make update" from /usr/src - it updates /usr/src, /usr/ports, etc.
H
__
