running 12.2 STABLE, I would like a complete DEFAULTS and PORTS
example for gitup.conf.
forums and this list provide changes [ tersely or sed templating tersely, ] ,
but no latest
indication in its entirety of which invocation would work that I've been able
to make
update the ports past april
[ top posting cause the browser mandates it sorry ]
I read something suggesting that
knowledge of pypy may help persons port py27 apps to py37? if
the maintainer knows about the app
or convert it from py27 to pypy? pending py38 rewrite?
On Tuesday, April 21, 2020, 12:00:59 PM GMT,
wrote:
building 5.6 or 5.6.1 results in three errors here.
Most critical is 'bindkey: not found" rendering the terminal near useless.
I restored most functionality putting /usr/local/lib/zsh/5.5.1 files back
where 5.6 can find them but no luck with 5.6.1 either
__
pkgdb -u
origins - not a string
(NilClass)
Cannot read the pkgdb!
.
That has just started happening.
pkg update
Shared object 'libarchive.so.7' not found, required by "pkg"
.
Attachment probably not sent to the list.
CD /usr/ports/devel/p5-List-Regexp [new june 20 ]
make build
...
Encode.c: loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched ( got handshake
key 0x8900080, needed
0x7b00080
*** Error code 1
Stop.
make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/p5-
Many ports newly report 'fstat' and refuse to run, and as many don't build
until I
get around to a buildworld cycle, the workaround is to run v11 pkg
pkg install -f ...
on this v12 system, then lock the new port from being re-from-package
or re-built
..
Otoh, some l
On Fri, 6/9/17, Jonathan Chen wrote:
Subject: Re: Unable to update repository Synth
To: "Bob Willcox"
Cc: "ports list"
Date: Friday, June 9, 2017, 3:14 PM
On 10 June 2017 at 05:02, Bob
Willcox
wrote:
> I am running the drm-next-4.7
and w
I see the same message, upon load, ...
On Thu, 6/1/17, blubee blubeeme wrote:
Subject: nvidia drivers mutex lock
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org
Date: Thursday, June 1, 2017, 11:35 AM
I'm running nvidia-drivers 375.66 w
tl/dr at bottom, repeated here, flowchart please
On Tue, 5/30/17, Adam Weinberger wrote:
Subject: Re: The future of portmaster
To: me...@bris.ac.uk
Cc: rollingb...@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Date: Tuesday, May 30, 2017, 7:30 AM
> On
First try, did not build, to try to fix, Xorg, took the easy way out and
restored the
/usr/local/bin/Xorg that was working two days ago from backup.
Xorg.log.0 says it is devd???
...
error in Subject is only from memory.
...
On 02/ 8/17 08:06 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
please work on having the "Latest" image in a directory that has the
cvs revision number in its name
and make the current names just be links to there.
I ONCE AGAIN (for the third time) got half of one release (432891) and
half of another (433120
On 02/ 6/17 09:59 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
On February 7, 2017 2:35:16 AM GMT+01:00, Jeffrey Bouquet
wrote:
All the files
/etc/FreeBSD.conf
/usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf
/usr/local/etc/pkg.conf
I edit time after time for
{$ABI} which gives FreeBSD:11:i386 but I am on 12-CURRENT i386
pkg install driftnet wants to install gcc, and REMOVE
truecrypt, gcc49, xpi-web-developer...[23 more]...sscalc.
This has been going on almost a half-year it seems.
as gcc49 and gcc install files into the same place.
Before that several years, again IIRC, with no such specific
problem...
___
tacking a slightly off-topic topic onto this one
On 12/15/16 10:31 AM, list-freebsd-po...@jyborn.se wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 01:18:05PM -0500, George Mitchell wrote:
On 12/15/16 09:40, Warren Block wrote:
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote:
On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote:
pkg install [ as always, here, an edge case, ]
some forty [because not wanting the other thirty that " pkg upgrade"
wants to do ] ran into difficulty with a gcc-4.9 and gcc49 conflict... [
installs into
same place some file ]
[tl;dr a bit of the above, I never answer Y to 'pkg upgrade' but
On 06/ 3/16 08:17 AM, Franco Fichtner wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>> On 01 Jun 2016, at 2:12 PM, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>>
>> There is a main difference - if you upgraded from 9.2 to 9.3, you don't need
>> to recompile (reinstall) all ports, but if you upgraded from 9.3 to 10.x you
On 06/ 3/16 08:17 AM, Franco Fichtner wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>> On 01 Jun 2016, at 2:12 PM, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>>
>> There is a main difference - if you upgraded from 9.2 to 9.3, you don't need
>> to recompile (reinstall) all ports, but if you upgraded from 9.3 to 10.x you
Today svn-of-ports has about 600 (tc,mc) /200 (r) = 800 responses
required (tree and etc conflicts)
1...
Select:
(mc) prepare for updating moved-away children, if any (recommended),
(p) postone, (q)
On 02/15/2016 09:32, Roger Marquis wrote:
>> This makes no sense. Ports are not tied to base releases.
>> And you think lack of developer resources is an invalid reason?
>
> There was no mid-release issue with base as far as I know. The issue was
> with ports and by extension pkgng (and relat
synth status
Querying system about current package installations.
Stand by, comparing installed packages against the ports tree.
Stand by, building pkg(8) first ... Failed!! (Synth must exit)
Unfortunately, the system upgrade failed.
11.0-CURRENT r288246
pkg-1.6.2
synth-0.98_5
/usr/ports
/var/
This error has recently appeared. So a make has to be
dp_PORTSDIR=/usr/ports make...
and it seems to ignore it being set in make.conf to try
to fix it, even.
Wondering if it is local to just here...
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://l
On 10/19/2015 16:41, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Bryan Drewery wrote
>
>> I could go on, but really I think both are pretty bad compared to using
>> Poudriere, which also has a 'distclean' sub-command.
> OK, Thanks for all detail. I would have run a poudriere to compare
> with the previous 3,
Compounding the problem:
The machine here is usually not running during the nightly pkg backup.
The problem:
Recently a glitch in a Western digital drive [that fsck_ffs fixed ] lost
/var/db
I restored local.sqlite from the prior days' backup...
[ and eventually found it renamed within /lost+
This might be related to a thread (pcmanfm) today in the forums with
similar issues.
Suddenly after today's pkg update of gnome stuff, firefox and
seamonkey permit browsing UNTIL one tries to save a page, it
seems, then no further interaction with the browser is permitted
until a restart. So
I've a note in devel/subversion that it failed to install in March this
year...
Just then (aug 6) it again fails to install [ terse kwallet-dynamic-lib
something, broken
install line in built-already install-from-stage ; the relevant ??
option is deselected ].
Maybe someone knows if some option i
Each time across major versions I find it convenient to install one or two
upgrades ( portupgrade and another, in this case)
pkg install portupgrade [the installworld just completed an hour or two ago]
I use a
script reinstall.log pkg install portupgrade
Because
the deinstalls called for are
/bin/rm -v aclocal-1.10
/bin/rm -v aclocal14
Not relevant, but were not belonging to anything (/usr/local/bin)
cp -iv /usr/local/bin/aclocal-1.4 /usr/local/bin/aclocal-1.14
cp -iv /usr/local/bin/automake-1.4 /usr/local/bin/automake-1.14
Those two lines enabled a new port to configure (ed
/bin/rm -v aclocal-1.10
/bin/rm -v aclocal14
cp -iv /usr/local/bin/aclocal-1.4 /usr/local/bin/aclocal-1.14
cp -iv /usr/local/bin/automake-1.4 /usr/local/bin/automake-1.14
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
On 06/01/15 13:44, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> [pkg@ snipped, because it's irrelevant]
>
> Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports writes:
>
>> I noticed the ports tree here had net/uget 1.10.4_1 even after "svn up"...
>> while
>> pkg upgrading installed
I noticed the ports tree here had net/uget 1.10.4_1 even after "svn up"... while
pkg upgrading installed 2.0. "pkg version" (one of 3 ways) reported
"succeeds port"... was about to post a question about pkg, but it can be fixed
by
cd /usr/ports/net/uget
svn revert . -R
[found at stackoverflow
On 05/15/15 19:25, Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports wrote:
> Freebsd 10 STABLE
>
> perl5-5.20.2_4
>
> 1...
> Error in Makefile.PL line 21
> [building p5-Gtk2]
> while trying to build to fix...
>
> 2...
> Line 49 in gprename (x11-fm)
> line 26 in Gtk2.pm (p5-G
Freebsd 10 STABLE
perl5-5.20.2_4
1...
Error in Makefile.PL line 21
[building p5-Gtk2]
while trying to build to fix...
2...
Line 49 in gprename (x11-fm)
line 26 in Gtk2.pm (p5-Gtk2)
[running gprename]
Trying to rename files that are slightly too lengthy for
cli rename tools. This error appears
On 03/02/15 06:57, Beeblebrox wrote:
>>> Using dbus-1.8.12, /etc/rc.conf has (dbus_enable="YES",
>>> slim_enable="YES"). This works no more. X.Org starts, but cannot
>>> login to any Desktop because dbus actually is not running and has
>>> not started.
>>>
>>> Kill Xorg, then manually "service one
No pkg failures , but quirks:
.
1.
Backing up pkgng database:
pkg: Ignoring bad configuration entry in /etc/pkg/pkg.conf: "/usr/cache/pkg"
pkg: Ignoring bad configuration entry in /etc/pkg/pkg.conf: "INDEX-10"
pkg: Ignoring bad configuration entry in /etc/pkg/pkg.conf:
On 01/13/15 07:55, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> customizations you need available. If the default options don't cut it
>> for you, in order to use only binary packages that means you need to run
>> your own poudriere setup -- which is well worth it if you're managing
>> several machines / jails
On 01/11/15 22:59, Fred Woods wrote:
> If you run opera from a terminal window, do you get something like the
> problem described in:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2568408/pango-warning-failed-to-choose-a-font-expect-ugly-output
>
> If yes, then a possible work-around is:
>
> Move any pango
II can browser fine with Opera still [mostly] but cannot interact with its
dialog. ONLY the lowercase 'a' [and uppercase E] show. For instance, the
'graphics' button (on off toggle) has [ a ] and the 'open in background tab' is
[ _ a a ] ...
So the prompts and browser action are only by 'wha
On 12/26/14 17:30, Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports wrote:
> pkg-static fails to install python27 after v9 > v10 (cannot find .so in
> STAGE)...
> Occurred in some other port also. (openssl or openssh maybe, unsure)
>
Today after pkg fetching and reinstalling a few ports
pkg-static fails to install python27 after v9 > v10 (cannot find .so in
STAGE)...
Occurred in some other port also. (openssl or openssh maybe, unsure)
pkg-static prints "Ignoring bad configuration entry in /etc/pkg/pkg.conf"
repeatedly, hiding
portmaster y/n questions behind it...
However,
[ Sorry for the duplicate empty message!]
[ Just for the archives... ]
[ More of a thumbs up to portupgrade than a reposting of the problem...]
Seems to work handily... for the time being anyway.
#portupgrade -P [ -i ] [port ] [2nd port ] [ grep lib somefileofports.dat ]
once one has made a syml
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Reverted to pkg, by build, and FORCE PKG REGISTER.
pkgs still cannot be installed.
Still stuck with ports ( however portupgrade -- non-packages -- seems to be
working with this pkg << pkg-devel downgrade )
(/ portmaster? == no, cannot get
handle, lock on database) only.
..###
pkg info pkg
pkg-1.4.99.0 (pkg-devel)
cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg-devel
make deinstall
pkg-devel not installed, skipping
...
Wanted to revert to PKG because pkg-devel after deinstall
pkg fetch zgv zziplib
pkg install zgv zziplib
Installs the
On 12/06/14 04:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have released a new 1.4.0 rc2 version of pkg (available in
> ports-mgmt/pkg-devel) since first beta it has received tons of bug fixes and
> should be now way more reliable and able to handle ootb without mistakes
> upgrades like the gettext
>>On Sun, 11/23/14, Ajtim wrote:
>>Subject: gtk20
>>The yesterdays update of gtk20 works but I have a problem
>>with Firefox and
>>with GIMP:
I'm concerned also, but because of "pkg install glib20 gtk20" has to be run like
this ... am waitin
On 11/20/14 04:19, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
> Only one port has not failed at "pkg install port" ... after today's
> update and
> also failed at deinstall pkg >> install pkg-devel to try to fix it.
>
> [ Duplicate post, so I could post the error and this update. ]
>
>
> Script started on Thu Nov 20
pkg update
Downloaded new pkg database today.
pkg install >>> abort trap
every two of three "pkg install ..." (only one has proceeded.)
This browser won't permit paste-ins, I've posted it in the forum in two threads
(Xorg and Ports sections)
pkg-1.4.0a3
Q 2is this to be addressed to free
>>On Mon, 11/17/14, Warren Block wrote:
>>Actually, portmaster can do
>>that also:
>>portmaster -t -y
>>-clean-distfiles
___
Test first" I did not want the majority deleted...
#portsclean -DD -n
On 11/07/14 10:32, Bartek Rutkowski wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Chris H wrote:
>> On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 09:08:28 + Bartek Rutkowski wrote
>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Baptiste Daroussin
>>> wrote:
Hi all,
tijl@ spotted an interesting point, distinfo and
On 11/05/14 16:42, Mark Felder wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014, at 18:01, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
>> On 11/05/14 13:30, Mark Felder wrote:
>>> - duplicate packages registered in pkg_info
>> I could simply /bin/rm -rf the duplicate subdirectory.
>>
> Your're treating the symptom not the problem. Thi
On 11/05/14 13:30, Mark Felder wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014, at 10:16, Roger Marquis wrote:
>> Was a time when FreeBSD was believed to be a more stable and compatible
>> platform than Linux. Of course all that backwards compatibility was
>> thrown out the window with this year's make and pkg up
1... attachment
2 quoted
3... reply Sorry for the formatting... browser crashes with attachments
often and
webmail needs a revamp...
+
WebService::Bloglines priovides you an Object Oriented interface for Bloglines
Web Services (BWS). I
I wonder if that has anything with the
"child process terminated abnrmally" I saw when starting a
"make build" in most any, or a number of, port(s) recently... on another v9
machine.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
Not initially welcoming this new effort...
explanation and other PKG problems taking precedence...
I've a few scripts which use the smaller files, and have used them
extensively in pipes. Syntax within the Makefile would make those
counterintuitive.I would wonder also if it would break
Continuing with the latest pkg2ng failure to actually convert >> import another
local.sqlite >> pipe to a pkg install [ ] -f -y ...
I deleted a few ports to save space. Then,
Continuing with the reinstall of not converted but installed reinstalls ...
The following bug persists after a reboot:
TOP POSTED SORRY
Moot point on this machine, vs others , probably; also, part of the message
below was wrong.
they are only installed if desinstalling from the port subdirectory and not
thru package IIRC
WORKAROUND:
meanwhile I copied a local.sqlite from a more recent machine to the failed
pkg2n
Built with clang... none of the problems (so far) from the previous builds
appear to exist from
initial testing of pkg and of a port install.
v9
had to use -DFORCE_PKG_REGISTER though...
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
> Subject: custom gcc article outdated?
>Specifically, is this form still understood:
>*quote*
>Add the following lines to the /etc/make.conf file (or
>modify appropriately):
>if !empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/ports/*) &&
>exists(/usr/local/bin/gcc44)
>CC=gcc44
>CXX=g++44
>CPP=cpp44
>.endif
package install this that this that seems to complete most of the installs, but
if one of the ports has a conflict
then the upgrades are not registered. For example, todays conflict between
py-pillow and py-imaging resulted
in (that is, despite of the conflict...) two successful upgrades
mbu
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/bin/paragrep", line 5, in
from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 2837, in
working_set = WorkingSet._build_master()
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/sit
Replies at the bottom, in a paragraph or two...
On Wed, 7/2/14, Robert Huff wrote:
Subject: Re: libxul.so rebuilt, still a version error.
To: po...@freebsd.org
Date: Wednesday, July 2, 2014, 8:38 AM
J Bouqet writes:
> /usr/local/lib/firefo
/usr/local/lib/firefox/libxul.so
/usr/local/lib/libxul//libxul.so
/usr/local/lib/libxul/sdk/lib/libxul.so
/usr/local/lib/seamonkey/libxul.so
/usr/local/lib/thunderbird/libxul.so
Rebuilt libxul.
Seamonkey, firefox would not start still:
XPCOMGlueLoad Error for file ... libxul.so:
/usr/lib/libstd
I found a PR which was closed with the same error (Its originator had fixed it
by reinstalling all ports.)
..
This persists in dbus, po4a, etc and I reinstalled exactly as UPDATING all
docbook, as well as
a fix someone recently found for it, to the extent it was d
63 matches
Mail list logo
