[Cc to ports@freebsd,org, but please followup at n...@freebsd.org]
anyone interested in taking over maintainership of ports/net/click ?
We have 1.5.0 in the tree, which is old and partly broken.
1.8.0 builds almost without problems, and the two patches i am
attaching give huge speedups for the use
committed, thanks
In general it would be good if, in the PR, people give more detail
on the changes. E.g. in this case you wrote 'A new version is
available' but you did a lot more work than changing two lines in
the Makefile. Something like
This updates the code to version 3.83 and splits th
quick question - with the recent vulnerability of linux-f8-pango,
the USE_GNOME=gtk20 dependency in nspluginwrapper prevents the
nspluginwrapper port from installing.
I am a bit unsure on whether the linux gtk2 dependency is needed by
nspluginwrapper itself, or it is only (selectively) needed
for
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 01:25:41PM -0700, Cynthia Flynn wrote:
> I would like to draw your attention to this posting in regards to the
> syslinux FreeBSD port:
>
> http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2009-March/011749.html
>
> FWIW, that posting belongs to this thread:
>
> http://syslinux.zy
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 01:18:31PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > I would suggest to apply the fix unconditionally
>
> Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see the part where you said, "I tested
> this fix and it worked for me."
&qu
hi,
i noticed on my laptop (Dell X1 w/ 512MB ram - i386, RELENG_7 that
openoffice3 is using an unreasonable amount of memory to build one
of its components (during the build of resourcemodel, the offending
file is unxfbsdi.pro/misc/qnametostr.cxx) which causes the build
machine to spend a huge amou
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 01:12:37PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:26:31 -0500, Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >A fair amount of third party software in ports still uses
> >which in our system is like this:
> >
> > /*
A fair amount of third party software in ports still uses
which in our system is like this:
/* $FreeBSD: src/include/malloc.h,v 1.5 2001/11/07 23:14:31 obrien Exp
$ */
#if __STDC__
#error " has been replaced by "
#else
#include
#endif
What is the
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 02:16:18PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav píse v pá 09. 11. 2007 v 13:49 +0100:
>
> > Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I think an easy fix is to replace, in the wrapper, sed and find with
> > > /usr/bin/s
on a non-standard
environment.
Objections ?
cheers
luigi
---+-----
Luigi RIZZO, [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione
http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa
TEL/FAX: +39-050
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 05:56:05PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > as the subject says, i was wondering if there is any standard method
> > to fetch the sources for a port from a Subversion (or CVS or other
> > scm) repository.
> >
> >
as the subject says, i was wondering if there is any standard method
to fetch the sources for a port from a Subversion (or CVS or other
scm) repository.
Right now i am doing it with the following sequence
(the use of update vs checkout is because originally i
fetched into distfiles, not ${WRKSRC},
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 08:48:59PM -0700, Andriy Babiy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to try making the port, but faced a problem:
>
> The requested URL /spca50x/Download/gspcav1-20070110.tar.gz was not found
> on this server.
> Apache/ProXad [Apr 14 2007 12:48:55] Server at mxhaard.free.fr
>
> This
ernal structure from time_t to a struct timeval in a
My suggestion is to downgrade libosip2 to version 2.2.2 and
apply the patch attached.
Objections ?
cheers
luigi
---+-----
Luigi RIZZO, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 05:15:34AM +0100, Soeren Straarup wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 07:35:29PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > Is anyone working on the linphone port, or i can do that ?
> >
> > I managed to make linphone 1.6.0 work with video4linux and
> > lib
Is anyone working on the linphone port, or i can do that ?
I managed to make linphone 1.6.0 work with video4linux and
libosip2.2.2, so would like to replace the old port.
If someone else is working on it, please contact me.
I am cc-ing the osip2 maintainer because it seems that
linphone does not
This is related to the linphone-base port, which has its own
problems, but still...
I am trying to enable video support for it, and the first
problem is that its configure script does not detect SDL
unless i put an additiona -lpthread in CFLAGS (because libSDL
requires some pthread functions). The
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:12:11AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >>>>> On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 07:44:29 -0800
> >>>>> Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> rizzo> after hitting a couple of them myself (net/ekiga and mbone
dear ports maintainers,
after hitting a couple of them myself (net/ekiga and mbone/vic),
i believe that there is a number of ports, especially in the
multimedia/ graphics/ net/ mbone/ categories which might
make good use of a
BUILD_DEPENDS+= v4l_compat>=1.0.20060801:${PORTSDIR}/multimedia/v4l_com
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 07:45:28PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo píse v pá 02. 02. 2007 v 09:27 -0800:
> > I have some ports (linux-gspca-kmod, linux-ov511-kmod, more in the
> > future) which depend on linux-kmod-devel which in turn only works
> > on i386 and 6.2
I have some ports (linux-gspca-kmod, linux-ov511-kmod, more in the
future) which depend on linux-kmod-devel which in turn only works
on i386 and 6.2 or above.
Is it enough to put ONLY_FOR_ARCHS and .if ${OSVERSION} < ...
just in the parent (linux-kmod-devel), or should i
put it in all children too
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 11:57:52AM +0300, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:01:24 -0800
> Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> >
> > typo.. thanks. Speaking of names, what's best for the devel/ thing ?
> > linux-bsd-kmod looks like ju
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 01:54:14AM +0300, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:03:45 -0800
> Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> >
> > #--- this is pkg-plist 000
> > @exec mkdir -p %D/share/linux-bsd-kmod
> > @exec echo &quo
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:57:12PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > I have a port that just need to install the content of a tarball
> > (a set of headers and C sources) into
> > /usr/local/share/linux-bsd-kmod/linux_compat,
> >
> > and was wo
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:41:53PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:30:26PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > and to answer to your second point...
> > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
...
> > > That Makefile.kld would
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:03:45AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> I have a port that just need to install the content of a tarball
> (a set of headers and C sources) into
> /usr/local/share/linux-bsd-kmod/linux_compat,
>
> and was wondering what is the proper way to handle this (both
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:44:58PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:40:52PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:25:11PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:20:11PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
> >
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:25:11PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:20:11PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:37:20AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > ...
>
and to answer to your second point...
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:37:20AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
> > In term of port's backward compatibilty, the extra .PATH or -I
> > could be supplied by the files in
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:37:20AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
> > Now, this may well be a one-of-a-kind case calling for an ad-hoc
> > solution, but if all we need is accept to use ${PREFIX}/share/mk
> > for
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:20:51PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:17:27AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > I have a port (the one mentioned in my previous msg)
> > which needs to install its own make's include file,
> > bsd.linux_kmod.mk , and I th
I have a port that just need to install the content of a tarball
(a set of headers and C sources) into
/usr/local/share/linux-bsd-kmod/linux_compat,
and was wondering what is the proper way to handle this (both in
the port's Makefile and in the pkg_plist file).
Given that INSTALL doesn't have a '
I have a port (the one mentioned in my previous msg)
which needs to install its own make's include file,
bsd.linux_kmod.mk , and I thought that there was
a system-wide place such as ${PREFIX}/share/mk
where the port could install the file in the first place,
and where make would look for it by defa
these values set ?
I suppose the problem is common to many ports...
cheers
luigi
- Forwarded message from Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:32:23 -0700
From: Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [asterisk-dev] autoconf issues fo
34 matches
Mail list logo
