Well, 11-STABLE now has LLVM 5.0 too, so it should work as well as in head. I
actually tried it on the recent 11-STABLE.
On 17-10-18 10:03:49, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 10/18/2017 09:59, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
According to https://wiki.freebsd.org/lldb, it should work just fine on
amd64, apart from
According to https://wiki.freebsd.org/lldb, it should work just fine on amd64,
apart from kernel debugger. I suppose there should be some improvements for
other archs too, since that page was updated 1.5 years ago :)
On 17-10-18 09:54:05, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 10/18/2017 09:52, Piotr Kubaj
Shouldn't lldb be the replacement for gdb in base?
On 17-10-18 09:47:25, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 10/18/2017 06:33, Jan Beich wrote:
Kubilay Kocak writes:
On 10/18/17 8:29 AM, Jan Beich wrote:
Guido Falsi writes:
On 10/17/2017 23:11, Guido Falsi wrote:
Thing is, recompiling with WITH_DE
I think I got it. It turns out that it's our gdb in base that can't read the
debug info. lldb and gdb from ports do it just fine.
I also thought about recompiling library dependecies, but something didn't fit
in, because not only the libraries calls were not there, but the calls from the
port
Hi all,
I am preparing a new port. However, I hit an assertion fail when starting the
binary. The developer is willing to help me, provided that I send him backtrace
and values from the structure that hits assertion failure.
Thing is, recompiling with WITH_DEBUG doesn't help (I only get memory
After your commit, I now get an error during staging:
(00:00:54)
===
(00:00:54) ===
(00:00:54) ===> Staging for MailScanner-5.0.3_1
(00:00:54) ** Missing /usr/ports/mail/mailsca
Could you send me a truss(1) output of the relevant process?
On 17-03-01 11:36:02, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Piotr Kubaj wrote on 2017/03/01 11:13:
> > If FPM works fine, it looks to me more like PHP error than Lighttpd's.
> > Could you use truss(1) on Lighttpd'
If FPM works fine, it looks to me more like PHP error than Lighttpd's. Could
you use truss(1) on Lighttpd's process to obtain more information?
On 17-03-01 10:56:29, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Piotr Kubaj wrote on 2017/03/01 08:59:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I use Lighttp
Hi,
I use Lighttpd 1.4.45_1 on 11.0-RELEASE with mod_fastcgi and php-cgi. There are
no problems with this setup. Are you sure php-cgi processes are running are the
socket file is present?
On 17-03-01 00:36:46, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Hi,
> I upgraded from 1.4.44 to 1.4.45_1 and after service
My old email will work for a while, I'll do it when sending PR with
other issues with the given port.
On 01/07/16 13:45, Renato Botelho wrote:
>> On Jan 7, 2016, at 10:44, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
>>
>> I'm changing my email to pku...@anongoth.pl. This email is written to
Could you test this diff?
Index: Makefile
===
--- Makefile(revision 403188)
+++ Makefile(working copy)
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
# $FreeBSD$
PORTNAME?= lighttpd
-PORTVERSION= 1.4.37
+PORTVERSION= 1.4.38
CATEGORIES?= www
MA
On 09/09/2015 07:07, Ben Woods wrote:
> On 9 September 2015 at 07:00, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
>> On 09/09/2015 06:44, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> If you list the distfiles that you want to have automatically extracted
>>> in EXTRACT_ONLY, then it will leave the unlisted ones u
On 09/09/2015 06:44, Don Lewis wrote:
> If you list the distfiles that you want to have automatically extracted
> in EXTRACT_ONLY, then it will leave the unlisted ones untouched.
But I want the other one to properly extract and compile. Does that mean
I'd have to write my own extract: step?
sign
On 09/09/2015 00:58, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
> I think EXTRACT_ONLY will do the equivalent of what you need.
>
>
> From: owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org] on
> behalf of Piotr Kubaj [pku...@ris
I'm a maintainer of a few ports. For the next update I'm preparing, I
want to make it possible to download some addons via options. The thing
is, they are downloaded as-is. They are not meant to be extracted
(although they are zips), since it's the program itself that manages it.
Is there such a po
15 matches
Mail list logo
