Re: Using just db44 for all instead of mixed usage of db41/db42/db44 (was: Re: mutt vs db44 // Bug in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.database.mk ?)

2013-02-18 Thread Raphael Eiselstein
for incompatible db4x-Version? compiler/linker errors? Runtime errors? Data structure errors in data files? Data loss or corrupted db files? Regards Raphael -- Raphael Eiselstein r...@uugrn.org http://rabe.uugrn.org/ xmpp:freiby...@gmx.de | https://www.xing.com/profile/Raphael_Eiselstein

Using just db44 for all instead of mixed usage of db41/db42/db44 (was: Re: mutt vs db44 // Bug in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.database.mk ?)

2013-02-15 Thread Raphael Eiselstein
Hi all, Just to get an answer to this thread: On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 02:13:30PM +0100, Raphael Eiselstein wrote: On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 01:51:09PM +0100, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: # UNIQUENAME_WITH_BDB_VER in /etc/make.conf? havn't tried yet. But for me it makes more sens to pin all ports

Re: mutt vs db44 // Bug in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.database.mk ?

2013-02-09 Thread Raphael Eiselstein
=44 --- What will fail if I do so? (recompiling all our local packages will take 12h+ just to find out ...) Why do we have so much versions of bdb in our ports? Best Regards Raphael -- Raphael Eiselstein r...@uugrn.org http://rabe.uugrn.org/ xmpp:freiby

mutt vs db44: Shared object libdb-4.4.so.0 not found, required by mutt

2013-02-08 Thread Raphael Eiselstein
to the mutt package? With best regards Raphael Eiselstein PS: [root@fbsd9 /var/tmp/usr/ports/mail/mutt/work/mutt-1.5.21]# uname -a FreeBSD fbsd9.uugrn.org 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #1: Wed Jan 2 19:52:57 CET 2013 r...@top3.uugrn.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VIMAGE amd64 -- Raphael Eiselstein

Re: mutt vs db44 // Bug in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.database.mk ?

2013-02-08 Thread Raphael Eiselstein
-2.1.26_2 Dependency: libiconv-1.14 Dependency: gettext-0.18.1.1 Dependency: libidn-1.26 -- -- works for me. On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 09:15:03PM +0100, Raphael Eiselstein wrote: Depends on: Dependency: db42-4.2.52_5 *** Dependency