Re: llvm-mingw Cross Compiler

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 1:05 AM Theron wrote: > On 2020-04-17 02:22, Russell Haley wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I found the most excellent llvm-mingw project by Martin Storsjo: > > https://github.com/mstorsjo/llvm-mingw/ > > > > It uses shell scripts to build

llvm-mingw Cross Compiler

Hello, I found the most excellent llvm-mingw project by Martin Storsjo: https://github.com/mstorsjo/llvm-mingw/ It uses shell scripts to build all the components. I'm currently using it on FreeBSD 12 to cross build itself for Windows for i686 and amd64 (x86_64 to be exact). Is there any

Re: Dropping maintainership of my Ports

Thanks for all your hard work Neel! On Friday, March 27, 2020, Neel Chauhan wrote: > Hi freebsd-ports@, > > I would like to drop maintainership for the following Ports: > > databases/py-mysqlclient > deskutils/go-for-it > devel/grpc > devel/libnsutils > devel/libparserutils >

Re: Re: Re: exFAT is no longer encumbered

On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 2:46 PM Carmel NY wrote: > On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:59:09 -0800, Russell Haley stated: > >On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 3:41 AM Carmel NY > >wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:51:41 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: > >> >On

Re: Re: exFAT is no longer encumbered

On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 3:41 AM Carmel NY wrote: > On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:51:41 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: > >On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 6:38 PM Kevin P. Neal > >wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 01:01:52AM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote: > >> > As of last August, Microsoft have relaxed the

Re: Adding FLAVORS to lua-luarocks

On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 12:56 AM Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 09:43:48PM -0800, Russell Haley wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have a review for updating the Lua package manager - LuaRocks - it to > the > > latest revision, 3.2.1. The new port file

Adding FLAVORS to lua-luarocks

Hello, I have a review for updating the Lua package manager - LuaRocks - it to the latest revision, 3.2.1. The new port file uses an update to lua.mk from Andrew Gierth for using FLAVORS to support all available versions of Lua. The reviews are here: (LuaRocks) https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17814

Re: Porters Handbook section 4.4

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Russell Haley <russ.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Mathieu Arnold <m...@mat.cc> wrote: >> Le 27/10/2017 à 05:26, Russell Haley a écrit : >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm still stuck building the n

Re: Porters Handbook section 4.4

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Mathieu Arnold <m...@mat.cc> wrote: > Le 27/10/2017 à 05:26, Russell Haley a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> I'm still stuck building the new chapters I wrote for the Porters >> Handbook. > > > Could you please create a review for

Re: Porters Handbook section 4.4

Sorry for the top post. Great suggestions. A little embarrassing that I didn't think of that. Lol Russ‎ Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Virgin Mobile network.   Original Message   From: Benjamin Kaduk Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2017 12:15 PM To: Russell Haley Cc: d...@freebsd.org

Re: Porters Handbook section 4.4

ellh/FreeBSD/doc/share/xml/freebsd-common.xsl line 21 element call-template The called template 'inline.monoseq' was not found. no result for book.parsed.xml *** Error code 9 So, there it sits, incomplete. If anyone can help or point me in some direction to look, I would be appreciative. Russ On Wed,

Re: Porters Handbook section 4.4

Hi, This is a rough cut of three new chapters at the beginning of the book. I have left all the original content in place (I think). I haven't attempted to get all the markup but I seem to have worked through all my xml errors. Unfortunately I'm getting an error about a missing xsl file

Re: Porters Handbook section 4.4

Kaduk <b...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 12:22:11AM -0700, Russell Haley wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Russell Haley <russ.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Warren Block <wbl...@wonkity.com> wrote: >

Re: Porters Handbook section 4.4

On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Russell Haley <russ.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Warren Block <wbl...@wonkity.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 25 Sep 2017, Russell Haley wrote: >> >>> Thanks! I'll play with this on the weekend. >

Re: Porters Handbook section 4.4

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Warren Block <wbl...@wonkity.com> wrote: > On Mon, 25 Sep 2017, Russell Haley wrote: > >> Thanks! I'll play with this on the weekend. > > > Please create a review at https://reviews.freebsd.org/ and add me as a > reviewer. > &g

Re: Help Wanted - Work with MSFT and help finish the port of .NET Core to FreeBSD

; From https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/1626#issuecomment-332668619 > > > > On 8 September 2017 at 10:51, Russell Haley <russ.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi I just dropped a twitter to Karel (suddenly feel less smart) and >> this was his response: &g

Re: Porters Handbook section 4.4

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:21 PM, Kubilay Kocak <ko...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 9/26/17 2:53 PM, Russell Haley wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:02 PM, Kubilay Kocak <ko...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> On 9/25/17 2:08 PM, Russell Haley wrote: >>>> Hi, >

Re: Porters Handbook section 4.4

On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:02 PM, Kubilay Kocak <ko...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 9/25/17 2:08 PM, Russell Haley wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Section 4.3 of the porters handbook talks about making modifications >> to a private copy of a tarball and recording the steps. >&

Porters Handbook section 4.4

Hi, Section 4.3 of the porters handbook talks about making modifications to a private copy of a tarball and recording the steps. Section 4.4 talks about changing directories into the affected ports dir and running make makepatch to generate patch files. I am unsure how the makepatch target is

Re: DotNet Core on FreeBSD

On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Russell Haley <russ.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Marcin, > > So I just read the Contribution License Agreement and I didn't see > anything untoward. > > https://cla2.dotnetfoundation.org/cladoc/net-foundation-contribution-license-agreeme

Re: DotNet Core on FreeBSD

eBSD in some ways because it's specifically designed do be modular. I don't think Mono has built on Arm for a long time and the performance of Mono has been a problem of note. Russ On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Russell Haley <russ.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry for the top post, > &

Re: DotNet Core on FreeBSD

.   Original Message   From: Marcin Cieslak Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 1:13 AM To: Russell Haley Cc: David Naylor; Geoffrey Huntley; Freebsd-mono; freebsd-advoc...@freebsd.org; freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DotNet Core on FreeBSD On Sun, 10 Sep 2017, Russell Haley wrote: > Hey g

DotNet Core on FreeBSD

Hey guys, I am talking to Karel and Tomas at Microsoft's DotNet Core Team about putting together a "proposal" for community involvement, which will be followed by more information on this list. Most of the talk has been me blowing air and being pedantic about nothing (I get excited and type

Re: Help Wanted - Work with MSFT and help finish the port of .NET Core to FreeBSD

Hi I just dropped a twitter to Karel (suddenly feel less smart) and this was his response: "Yep, I was poking at a plan internally first. Got some hinys and will reply tomorrow. Tomas even made some progress ." Sweet! Russ On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Russell Haley <russ.ha

Re: Help Wanted - Work with MSFT and help finish the port of .NET Core to FreeBSD

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:52 AM, David Naylor wrote: > On Monday, 4 September 2017 10:54:21 Geoffrey Huntley wrote: >> See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHllisWOCpU and >> https://twitter.com/GeoffreyHuntley/status/904227946084294656 > > Hi Geoffrey > > It is great to

Re: [package - 110amd64-default][lang/fsharp] Failed for fsharp-4.0.1.10 in build

Hey, So I'm just poking to see what's going on. I haven't changed anything from a day or two ago (I literally logged on and ran make) and now Nuget works (mostly) fine every time and fsharp builds on PC-BSD 10.3. It looks to me like this is an external site issue? Or perhaps they have been able

Re: Passing target to source Makefile

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Jan Beich <jbe...@vfemail.net> wrote: > Russell Haley <russ.ha...@gmail.com> writes: > >> 1) It does not use the recommended "freebsd" target. While the port >> overlays many of the same options, the system doesn't seem to

Re: Passing target to source Makefile

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:55 AM, olli hauer <oha...@gmx.de> wrote: > On 2016-07-21 08:03, Russell Haley wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> I've been able to hack up the Makefile for an update of lua53 but the >> one thing still missing is the ability to pass a target for t

Re: Passing target to source Makefile

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:55 AM, olli hauer <oha...@gmx.de> wrote: > On 2016-07-21 08:03, Russell Haley wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> I've been able to hack up the Makefile for an update of lua53 but the >> one thing still missing is the ability to pass a target for t

Passing target to source Makefile

Hi there, I've been able to hack up the Makefile for an update of lua53 but the one thing still missing is the ability to pass a target for the source Makefile (i.e. lua's Makefile, not the ports Makefile). I need to pass in "freebsd" as per the build instructions for lua. Also, I can't seem to

Re: Maintaining mono/.net

But lets give it a shot, shall we? Russ On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 4:30 AM, Kubilay Kocak <ko...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 28/06/2016 4:06 AM, Russell Haley wrote: >> Hello Ports Team, >> >> A couple of us on the freebsd-mono@ mailing list are having a >> discussio

Re: Maintaining mono/.net

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:43 AM, Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:06:02AM -0700, Russell Haley wrote: >> Hello Ports Team, >> >> A couple of us on the freebsd-mono@ mailing list are having a >> discussion on how best to m

Maintaining mono/.net

Hello Ports Team, A couple of us on the freebsd-mono@ mailing list are having a discussion on how best to maintain the mono ports/.net ports. One of the things that has come up is maintaining the patches for "all this stuff". The current paradigm in FreeBSD as I understand it is to use the files

Re: Latest MonoDevelop Progress

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Romain Tartière <rom...@blogreen.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:25:06PM -0700, Russell Haley wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Carsten Larsen <c...@innolan.dk> wrote: >> > On 25-06-2016, 20:56 Russell Haley wro

Changing Port to use Github

Hi There, So I am trying to rebuild a port using Github from the old tarball method. There are a number of external projects referenced so I have multiple tags as referenced in the handbook 5.4.3.1. Fetching Multiple Files from GitHub The port is failing to retrieve the third package:

MonoDevelop Rosyln

Hi There, I'm trying to create a current port of the MonoDevelop project. The port currently it sits at 5.0.1 and says it's broken. I have been able to get a build from Github working, but not from the tarball download method that the current port uses. I am trying to change the port over to use

Re: MonoDevelop port

Ah, you mean the chapter about Updating a Port that I somehow entirely missed? fail sound effect Thank you! Russ On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Mathieu Arnold m...@freebsd.org wrote: +--On 28 août 2015 22:02:50 -0700 Russell Haley russ.ha...@gmail.com wrote: | Hello, | | I would like

MonoDevelop port

Hello, I would like to update the ports files for the MonoDevelop IDE to the latest version. I have contacted the m...@freebsd.org mailing list about my intentions with no response. What is the next step forward to submit an update? Do I just create the shar and submit it via bugzilla? Thanks,