Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-16 Thread Thomas Backman
On Aug 15, 2009, at 22:58, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Doug Barton wrote: Thomas Backman wrote: Thanks, guys! However, a new issue appeared... Kind of. I know I read something about portsnap and INDEX on the -current list recently, so I'm guessing this is related? Maybe not, though

Re: portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Thomas Backman
On Aug 15, 2009, at 20:31, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Thomas Backman wrote: [...] [r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF ---> Checking the package registry database [r...@chaos ~]# portversion -l '<' dnsmasq < ezm3< libtool

portversion and pkg_version have different opinions on current versions

2009-08-15 Thread Thomas Backman
First off: not subscribed to this list, please make sure to Cc me or I won't see your answers! :) Oh, and I use portsnap, in crontab: 0 19 * * * portsnap -I cron update So, long story short: [r...@chaos ~]# pkgdb -aF ---> Checking the package registry database [r...@chaos ~]# portversion -l