Re: Runtime loader issue

On Wed, 9 May 2018 16:45:51 -0700 Steve Kargl wrote: > In review PR 228007, it came to my attention some individuals are > mis-characterizing a FreeBSD loader issue as "gfortran's FreeBSD > issue". See > >

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 16:19:39 +0200 Tobias C. Berner wrote: > Long answer: KDE is shipped in mulitple, let's call them groups: > - frameworks (libraries to build kde and qt applications) -- we call > these ports kf5-foo > - plasma (the desktop) -- we'll call these ports plasma5-foo > -

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:42:48 +0200 Adriaan de Groot wrote: > [where did this discussion take place, earlier? this is the first I've seen > it] > > So, there are roughly two migration paths: supposing someone has x11/kde4 > installed, which has dependencies on many

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:11:33 +0200 Stefan Esser <s...@freebsd.org> wrote: > Am 16.04.18 um 12:38 schrieb Tijl Coosemans: >> On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 14:18:22 +0200 Stefan Esser <s...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> The way the new KDE5/KF5 ports have been introduced a few week

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 14:18:22 +0200 Stefan Esser wrote: > The way the new KDE5/KF5 ports have been introduced a few weeks back has > caused me quite some effort (more than 100 hours of work), and now there > have been further changes to implement KDE5 support (which I generally >

Re: reccomendation for a building architecture schematic diagram editor ?

On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:21:20 +0200 "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: > Hi po...@freebsd.org people, > Might any of you have a FreeBSD ports/ reccomendation for a building > architecture schematic diagram editor, please ? To plan eg big house room > layouts { furniture moves, building

Re: pkg fallout - wrong shared lib version?

On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 18:13:07 -0500 "Jason E. Hale" wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> My port lang/opencoarrays gives this error >> via pkg-fallout: >> >> ... >> -- Installing: >>

Re: atomic in i386 Current after CLANG 6 upgrade

On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 18:37:47 +0100 Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 15 Jan 2018, at 11:43, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: >> I've already received a couple of messages from pkg-fallout about build >> failure on head-i386-default [1] [2] both pointing to the same

Re: atomic in i386 Current after CLANG 6 upgrade

On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 17:08:58 + David Chisnall wrote: > On 15 Jan 2018, at 17:00, Jan Beich wrote: >> It wouldn't help (see below). Clang 6 accidentally made __atomic* work >> enough to satisfy configure check but not for the port to build. I guess,

Re: atomic in i386 Current after CLANG 6 upgrade

On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:43:44 +0100 Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: > I've already received a couple of messages from pkg-fallout about build > failure on head-i386-default [1] [2] both pointing to the same errors, > about missing intrinsic symbols related to __atomic_* > > The

Re: Why portmaster try to install python 3.6 when I have 3.4 set in /etc/make.conf?

On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 21:59:17 +0100 Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 10.01.18 um 21:30 schrieb Stefan Esser: >> Am 10.01.18 um 17:29 schrieb Lev Serebryakov: >>> I have system with pre-FLAVORed ports installed, and try to update >>> ports with new version of "portmaster". My

Re: What to do when SCons-based project tries to open $LDFLAGS value as a file?

On Thu, 28 Dec 2017 23:35:00 -0800 Yuri wrote: > I am getting this error from scons: > >> g++6 -o lib/libtmv.so.0 " -L/usr/local/lib -fstack-protector >> -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc6 -L/usr/local/lib/gcc6" -fopenmp -shared ... >> >> g++6: error:  -L/usr/local/lib

Re: Linux ports tutorial? WPS Office

On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 18:27:10 -0500 Pedro Giffuni wrote: > The port still doesn't work: > - It appears it wants to use a old version of libpng that is not in our > centos7. > - USE_RPM doesn't install anything, it seems like we are missing support > for non-base RPMs. > > I

Re: FireFox memory usage

On Wed, 01 Nov 2017 21:10:13 +0100 Jan Beich wrote: > Jan Beich writes: >> Andrea Venturoli writes: >>> I'm on 10.3/amd64 with firefox-esr 52.3.0. >>> >>> Since a few days my 4GiB desktop is crawling due to swap usage and >>> looking at

Re: po/Makefile.in.in was not created by intltoolize."

On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 01:11:55 +0800 blubee blubeeme wrote: > I found this really old thread: > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtkmm-list/2009-August/msg00072.html > > and this really old script to "work around" the issue. > > #! /bin/sh -etest -n "$srcdir" ||

Re: Makefile cannot download from Sourceforge

On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:32:26 +0800 blubee blubeeme wrote: > I'm trying to download some files from sourceforge but it fails constantly. > > PORTNAME= zipios++ > PORTVERSION= 2.1.1 > MASTER_SITES= SF/zipios/ It looks like this should be

Re: Using blaslapack

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:20:26 +0300 Gleb Popov <6year...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm porting an application (DLib, https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12559) that > uses BLAS and LAPACK, and I have some questions. > > 1. Is there any pure C implementation that does not require Fortran > compiler? Probably

Re: gnu ltdl and FreeBSD

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:44:42 +0200 Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:37:57 +0800 blubee blubeeme <gurenc...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> CONFIGURE_ARGS= --without-included-ltdl --disable-ltdl-install >> USES=autoreconf gm

Re: gnu ltdl and FreeBSD

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:37:57 +0800 blubee blubeeme wrote: > I'm trying to port some software that keeps failing when it tries to find a > config.h. > > I know the config.h file is there but I think the compilation is failing > because it's trying to build ltdl and freebsd

Re: INSTALL_TARGET=install-strip runs into "permission denied"

On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 21:03:22 +0200 (CEST) Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote: > On Sun, 23 Apr 2017, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >>> [ https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10357 ] >> Yes, but in my opinion we should stop relying on upstream build systems >> to get strip

Re: INSTALL_TARGET=install-strip runs into "permission denied"

On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 22:37:57 +0200 (CEST) Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote: > [ Old thread alert, but still relevant. ] > > On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >>>>> install -m 555 mkheaders >>>>> .../prefix/gcc5/libexec/gcc5/gcc

Re: manpath change for ports ?

On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:18:53 +0200 Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 21/04/2017 à 00:16, Baptiste Daroussin a écrit: >> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:13:52AM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >>> I am waiting on an exp-run to fix this once and for all. >>> >>>

Re: pkg checksum mismatch for a variety of ports

On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:55:00 + tech-lists wrote: > Hello ports@, > > What's the significance of this and what can I do about it? Deinstalling > and reinstalling doesn't help. These were installed with ports r436245 > on 11.0-stable r314138: > > # pkg check -s > >

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 09:32:13 -0600 Adam Weinberger <ad...@adamw.org> wrote: > On 13 Mar, 2017, at 7:32, Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:25:13 -0700 Adam Weinberger <ad...@adamw.org> >> wrote: >>>> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 1

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:25:13 -0700 Adam Weinberger <ad...@adamw.org> wrote: >> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 12:53, Adam Weinberger <ad...@adamw.org> wrote: >>> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 12:29, Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:18

Re: Flashplayer issue

On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 08:45:53 -0600 The Doctor wrote: > Installing linux-flashplayer-24.0.0.221... > pkg-static: linux-flashplayer-24.0.0.221 conflicts with > linux-c7-flashplugin-24.0.0.186 (installs files into the same place). > Problematic file: >

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:18:18 -0700 Adam Weinberger <ad...@adamw.org> wrote: > On 11 Mar, 2017, at 10:13, Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 + (UTC) jbe...@freebsd.org (Jan >> Beich) wrote: >>> Tijl Coosemans <t...

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 + (UTC) jbe...@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) wrote: > Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> writes: >> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> >> wrote: >>> As some of you may have seen, I have do

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on > bsd.sites.mk recently. > > One question I ran into: If a site offers both HTTPS and HTTP, > which of the two do we prefer? (Or do we want to list

Re: manpath change for ports ?

On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:38:30 -0800 Steve Kargl <s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 05:03:08PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:50:39 +0100 Dag-Erling Smørgrav <d...@des.no> wrote: >>> John Baldwin <j

Re: manpath change for ports ?

On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:56:10 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > My proposal is to add to the manpath /usr/local/share/man in default > man(1) command in FreeBSD 12 (MFCed to 11-STABLE) > > and either provide an errata for 11.0/10.3 or a > /usr/local/etc/man.d/something.conf via a

Re: manpath change for ports ?

On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:50:39 +0100 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > John Baldwin writes: >> I wouldn't even mind if we had both /usr/local/man and /usr/local/share/man >> so long as our default MANPATH included both if that means applying fewer >> patches to ports. >

Re: manpath change for ports ?

On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 19:43:05 -0600 Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 12:35:32PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> Note that -rpath /usr/local/lib isn't added by gcc but by libtool >> because it assumes rtld will not search that directory automat

Re: manpath change for ports ?

On Thu, 09 Mar 2017 09:29:42 +0100 Dag-Erling Smørgrav <d...@des.no> wrote: > Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> writes: >> If you want to run a program from its build directory and the program >> links to a library also in the build directory then you

Re: manpath change for ports ?

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:31:32 -0700 Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> Are you talking about gcc implicitly searching /usr/local/include and >> /usr/local/lib? > > That's curren

Re: manpath change for ports ?

On Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:39:50 +0100 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > 4) Remove the hardcoded library path in lang/gcc* > > This makes it possible to work on software that includes both libraries > and programs while an earlier copy of the same software is already > installed. With the

Re: manpath change for ports ?

On Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:39:50 +0100 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > 4) Remove the hardcoded library path in lang/gcc* > > This makes it possible to work on software that includes both libraries > and programs while an earlier copy of the same software is already > installed. With the

Re: manpath change for ports ?

On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 09:51:14 -0600 Eric van Gyzen wrote: > On 03/06/2017 17:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports > > [...] > >> Which will also remove tons of hacks from the ports tree. >> >> What do you think?

Re: Make index fails with no entry for /usr/ports/audio/linux-c7-mikmod

On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 08:35:55 +0200 Vasil Dimov wrote: > This happens when emulators/linux_base-c7 is installed. Then > games/linux-uplink-demo/Makefile which contains "USE_LINUX=... mikmod > ..." picks up a dependency on audio/linux-c7-mikmod which does not > exist. > > Should

Re: Problem with index

On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 12:29:47 + Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 2017/02/20 11:36, Gerard Seibert wrote: >> I just updated my ports tree using "portsnap". I then ran the following >> command: >> >> /usr/sbin/pkg version -vL= >> >> This resulted in the following message: >> >>

Re: Problem with building libgcrypt

On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:11:30 +1100 (EST) Dave Horsfall wrote: >>> What is the output of "pkg which /usr/local/lib/libiconv.la"? >> >> Not found; I sense a generic approach to any more errors of this type :-) > > Removed as suggested (along with libxslt) as nothing claimed to

Re: Problem with building libgcrypt

On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:01:07 +1100 (EST) Dave Horsfall <d...@horsfall.org> wrote: > On Sun, 12 Feb 2017, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >>> *** [libgcrypt.la] Error code 1 >> >> See the 20140909 entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING about missing .la files. > > Th

Re: Problem with building libgcrypt

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:04:58 +1100 (EST) Dave Horsfall wrote: > Rebuilding ports on 10.3 after upgrade from 9.3, on the final portmaster > leg: > > libtool: link: ranlib .libs/libgcrypt.a > libtool: link: rm -fr .libs/libgcrypt.lax > sed:

Re: CFT upgrade to xorg 1.18.4 and newer intel/ati DDX

On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:55:16 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > This is a call for testing for newer Xorg along with newer drivers: > intel and ati. > > The patch against the head ports: > https://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/newxorg.diff I first updated the ati driver. Running

Re: Does building linux packages under poudriere require linux compatibility emulation?

On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:11:42 +0100 Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 01:07:09 +0100 Mark Martinec > <mark.martinec+free...@ijs.si> wrote: >> When building packages under poudriere on 11.0-RELEASE-p7 (from a >> command line in a

Re: flash plugin / nsplugin wrapper

On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:56:41 -0700 The Doctor wrote: > Hello. > > consistency please. > > Can these plugin have the option of Centos 6 OR centos 7 install;. > > I need Centos 7 for Xen / bhyve virtualisation. Add DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=linux=c7 or c7_64 to /etc/make.conf

Re: Does building linux packages under poudriere require linux compatibility emulation?

On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 01:07:09 +0100 Mark Martinec wrote: > When building packages under poudriere on 11.0-RELEASE-p7 (from a > command line in a terminal window) I'm noticing occasional streams of > diagnostic: > >ELF binary type "3" not known. > > which seem

Re: Gettext Issues

On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 17:17:52 -0700 "@lbutlr" wrote: >> On 16 Dec 2016, at 00:22, @lbutlr wrote: >>> 2014-11-30 >>> Affects: users of devel/gettext (close to everyone) >>> Author: t...@freebsd.org >>> Reason: >>> The devel/gettext port has been split up in

Re: Setting up CUPS on FreeBSD-arm using Raspberry Pi 2

On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 09:25:31 -0800 bob prohaska <f...@www.zefox.net> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 10:40:27AM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > > > Check that you have the following files and if not install x11/libXScrnSaver > > > > /usr/local/lib/libXss.a >

Re: Setting up CUPS on FreeBSD-arm using Raspberry Pi 2

On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 15:05:09 -0800 bob prohaska <f...@www.zefox.net> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 11:14:00PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> You need cups-filters yes. Please post the last couple of build commands >> and error messages you are seeing. > > The bu

Re: Setting up CUPS on FreeBSD-arm using Raspberry Pi 2

On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 10:20:58 -0800 bob prohaska wrote: > In trying to set up CUPS on a Raspberry Pi running -current there seems > to be a catch-22: CUPS compiles, installs and answers a browser pointed > at localhost:631 but attemps to print a test page report > > no such

Re: [HEADSUP] Default Perl changed to 5.24.

On Fri, 4 Nov 2016 23:00:56 + tech-lists wrote: > On 04/11/2016 22:58, tech-lists wrote: >> On 03/11/2016 15:00, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >>> Instructions on how to switch are in UPDATING. >>> >>> If you do not want to switch, you do not have to do anything. >> >> I

Re: make clean failes to cleanup everything

On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:18:51 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt <schm...@ze.tum.de> wrote: > Am 04.10.2016 um 14:03 schrieb Tijl Coosemans: >> On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 13:36:29 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt <schm...@ze.tum.de> wrote: >> >>> Am 04.10.2016 um 12:48 schrieb Tijl Coosemans

Re: make clean failes to cleanup everything

On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 13:36:29 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt <schm...@ze.tum.de> wrote: > Am 04.10.2016 um 12:48 schrieb Tijl Coosemans: >> On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:52:23 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt <schm...@ze.tum.de> wrote: >> >>> make clean fails to clean autoconf and autom

Re: make clean failes to cleanup everything

On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:52:23 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt wrote: > make clean fails to clean autoconf and automake. > > If a port uses autoconf and autoconf isn't installed on the system, it > will be build and installed. > > if you run make clean after installing the port, every

Re: How to migrate from ports/emulators/linux_base-c6 to linux_base-c7?

On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:30:21 -0700 David Wolfskill wrote: > Per ports/UPDATING entry 20141215, I have been using > emulators/linux_base-c6 on my laptop for some time. > > I recently noticed that ports/emulators/linux_base-c7 now exists (as of > r421391: 2016-09-05 13:10:30

Re: linux_base-c6 (....) on amd64 without x86_64 support

On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:19:23 +0200 Matthias Apitz wrote: > My other poudriere oven is freebsd-r302904-ports-20160716 (r418627) > so I will use this. What is the correct setting in make.conf for c6 x86_64? Before r421387: OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=c6_64

Re: linux_base-c6 (....) on amd64 without x86_64 support

On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:34:11 +0200 Matthias Apitz <g...@unixarea.de> wrote: > El día Monday, September 19, 2016 a las 01:51:19PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans > escribió: >> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:50:17 +0200 Matthias Apitz <g...@unixarea.de> wrote: >>> I have compiled

Re: linux_base-c6 (....) on amd64 without x86_64 support

On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:50:17 +0200 Matthias Apitz wrote: > I have compiled my ports with poudriere on amd64, based on ports r414411 > at the moment, and learned that the linux*c6 packages does not have > x86_64 support; I recompiled as test emulators/linux_base-c6 and only if >

Re: ports: on the fly pkg-plist creation from git pull

On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:52:34 +0200 CeDeROM wrote: > I am creating a port from a GIT repository. I would like to keep the > GIT file structure to user can update the project with GIT tools. I > know this is not the best and not even the valid way to update, but in > this particular

Re: Problems with out libgcc_s.so in base

On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 10:28:14 +0300 Konstantin Belousov wrote: > The option which would fix all this mess is: > 1. add rpath for gcc lib/ directory into spec file > and > 2. make ports collection use its own compiler instead of fighting with >the base. That still doesn't

Re: Problems with out libgcc_s.so in base

On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:48:28 +0200 Dimitry Andric <d...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 18 Aug 2016, at 11:15, Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:17:10 -0700 Steve Kargl >> <s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: >>>

Re: Problems with out libgcc_s.so in base

On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:17:10 -0700 Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 07:34:30PM -0400, Diane Bruce wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 04:03:51PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: >>> Freebsd-ports could also use a wrapper: >>> % cat ~/bin/gfc7 >>> #!

Re: pkg(1) continues after pre-install script fails

On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 18:15:42 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin <b...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 05:03:01PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> The linux_base-* packages require Linux support in the kernel during >> installation because they run /compat/linux/sbin/ld

pkg(1) continues after pre-install script fails

The linux_base-* packages require Linux support in the kernel during installation because they run /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig. The packages have a PRE-INSTALL script that checks this and returns an error if the support isn't there, but pkg(1) ignores such errors and continues to install the

Re: linux-c6/c6_64 update

On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:01:36 +0200 Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > Update linux-c6/linux_c6:64 (Revision 417169) from today > I have linux-c6_64\* packages installed. > Portmaster updated this packages. But it tried also install some > linux-c6 packages, but this

Re: failure compile libGL-11.1.2

On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:13:39 +0200 Willem Offermans wrote: > Dear FreeBSD friends, > > I have inherited an old FreeBSD beast and I'm trying to update it to 10.3. > > However the following error occurred during compiling libGL: > > ===> Building for libGL-11.1.2

Re: pkg vs hplip

On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:44:24 +0200 Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 17/03/2016 21:41, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> I am trying to upgrade to the latest official packages and I am getting the >> following: >> >> $ pkg upgrade >> ... >> Installed packages to be UPGRADED: >> ... >>

Re: USB devices and the latest update to CUPS

On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:40:01 +0100 Thomas Gellekum wrote: > On 03/18/2016 07:14, Jonathan Chen wrote: >> Ever since the latest update to CUPS, jobs sent attached to my USB >> printer are stuck with: >> >> D [18/Mar/2016:17:01:05 +1300] [Job 407]

Re: print/cups overhaul (PR 207746) side-effects

On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 16:41:47 +0100 Martin Waschbüsch <mar...@waschbuesch.de> wrote: > Am 12.03.2016 um 14:10 schrieb Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org>: >> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:52:08 +0100 Martin Waschbüsch <mar...@waschbuesch.de> >> wrote: >>&g

Re: cups update

On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 06:50:36 -0500 Stari Karp wrote: > Hi! > > In /usr/ports/UPDATING is: > > "20160311: >   AFFECTS: print/cups-base, print/cups-client, print/cups-image >   AUTHOR: t...@freebsd.org > >   The cups-base, cups-client and cups-image packages have been

Re: print/cups overhaul (PR 207746) side-effects

On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 20:52:08 +0100 Martin Waschbüsch wrote: > I just did a rebuild of packages for my webservers with poudriere. > What I noticed was that via the print/cups overhaul (see PR 207746), > quite a lot (>50) of additional dependencies are added to the system, >

Re: help make port for opencoarrays

On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:50:01 + David Chisnall <thera...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 22 Feb 2016, at 09:01, Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> I think Fortran is fine. It's C++ that's in a bad shape. I think the >> lang/gcc* ports need to be modified so libstd

Re: help make port for opencoarrays

On Sun, 21 Feb 2016 13:51:28 -0800 (PST) Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > From thie...@pompo.net Sun Feb 21 17:36:47 2016 >> Le mer 17 f_v 16 _ 23:50:37 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht >> _crivait_: >>> Please help/advise >>> >>>

Re: lang/gcc48 fails to build [on HEAD]

On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 13:59:54 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 07:23:40PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote: >> I think I found the problem. >> >> In my initial mail of this thread, I reported, that after upgrading >> Freebsd 11.0-CURRENT to r290538 (including

Re: Proper way to get base iconv.h with autoconf?

On Sun, 5 Jul 2015 21:11:55 + Marcin Cieslak sa...@saper.info wrote: [X-posted, replies set to po...@freebsd.org] Hello, I have managed to upstream few things needed to make mono work on FreeBSD without local patches. Now I am stuck with the iconv detection code. Mono (or it's

Re: gdb in ports

On Mon, 11 May 2015 16:21:42 -0400 Jason Woodward woodwa...@averesystems.com wrote: Hi all, I had sent this to Luca but maybe others might have an idea... I'm running into some difficulty debugging a live, multithreaded application. This seems to be the case with the 7.8.x gdbs and 7.9

Re: Makefile syntax for disabled NLS still looks for gettext

On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:31:18 +0300 Beeblebrox via freebsd-ports freebsd-ports@freebsd.org wrote: I have found 2 ports that fail to build when OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=NLS is used. The error is the usual GNU gettext tools not found problem. The Makefile of both ports have: NLS_CONFIGURE_ENABLE=

Re: Makefile syntax for disabled NLS still looks for gettext

On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:50:02 +0300 Beeblebrox via freebsd-ports freebsd-ports@freebsd.org wrote: Well, s**t, I spoke too soon. Solution works on host, not in poudriere. Try the attached patch.Index: net/linphone/Makefile === ---

Re: What causes libtool to relink?

On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 20:11:51 + (UTC) Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de wrote: I'm completely stuck on a problem report that comes down to this: /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=install for a loadable module triggers libtool to attempt to relink the .la file on the reporter's system,

Re: [CFT] sysutils/xfce4-power-manager 1.4.2

On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 23:14:34 + Olivier Duchateau olivi...@freebsd.org wrote: An update of sysutils/xfce4-power-manager is available for some time in Xfce devel repo. It's time to test it. Settings manager and panel were rewritten, support of FreeBSD (and DragonFly) was enhanced. upower

Re: testing the value of ${CXX} in ports Makefile

On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 22:46:32 -0800 (PST) Don Lewis truck...@freebsd.org wrote: gcc46, gcc47, gcc48, and probably gcc5 (haven't tested that one yet) all work. gcc49 requires a source patch. Can't you make the patch work with all versions of gcc? ___

Re: INSTALL_TARGET=install-strip runs into permission denied

On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 23:13:56 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com wrote: On Sunday 2015-01-18 13:01, Tijl Coosemans wrote: Here is the build log: install -m 555 fixinc.sh .../prefix/gcc5/libexec/gcc5/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd10.1/5.0.0/install-tools/fixinc.sh install -s -m 555

Re: INSTALL_TARGET=install-strip runs into permission denied

On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:18:27 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com wrote: The ports q/a framework has been suggesting this for a while, so I added INSTALL_TARGET=install-strip to lang/gcc5/Makefile. Using install-strip for vanilla GCC builds (from source, outside the FreeBSD Ports

Re: Installing openssl without gcc or binutils dependents

On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 05:05:48 +1100 Dewayne Geraghty dewayne.gerag...@heuristicsystems.com.au wrote: I would appreciate advise on the best approach to install openssl that has been built with gcc48 without needing to install gcc and binutils into the target machine? Background Attempting to

Re: reports down?

On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 12:41:42 -0800 (PST) Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote: redports.org times out. Is it down? It's been down for many weeks. I heard something was misconfigured on the last visit to the NYI site. ___

Re: Removal of XAA acceleration in X.org, and older NVIDIA GeForce

On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 19:45:35 +0100 Mark Martinec mark.martinec+free...@ijs.si wrote: /usr/ports/UPDATING: 20141219: AFFECTS: users of x11/xorg and all xorg ports AUTHOR: dumbb...@freebsd.org The X.Org server (x11-servers/xorg-server) is updated to 1.14.

Re: Why was ispell removed?

On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 13:58:04 -0700 Stephen Fisher sfis...@sdf.org wrote: I recently noticed that the ispell port has been removed in favor of the aspell-ispell port (ispell compatibility script for aspell). Does anyone know why it was removed? All I see on Fresh Ports is that it was

Re: Why was ispell removed?

On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 10:00:31 -0800 Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Tijl Coosemans t...@freebsd.org wrote: Give hunspell a try. It's actively maintained and backed by Mozilla, OpenOffice, LibreOffice,... % hunspell -d en_US Hunspell 1.3.3 Write

Re: Tracking Binary Ports/Pkgs Tree

On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 21:58:17 -0700 Reed A. Cartwright cartwri...@asu.edu wrote: I have been using poudriere for a while to build packages locally. I recently reduced the package server to just the ports that I need to have custom options. I want to rely on the freebsd pkgs as much as I can.

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 09:22:09 +0100 Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de wrote: Am 31.10.2014 um 19:56 schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: Hi all, tijl@ spotted an interesting point, distinfo and pkg-descr files files convenient are taking a lot of space for free, we can reduce the size of the

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

On Sun, 2 Nov 2014 18:16:23 + RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, 1 Nov 2014 00:07:23 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 19:56:21 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: tijl@ spotted an interesting point, distinfo and pkg-descr files files convenient

Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)

On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 19:56:21 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi all, tijl@ spotted an interesting point, distinfo and pkg-descr files files convenient are taking a lot of space for free, we can reduce the size of the while ports tree by a factor 2 by simply merging them into

Re: compiling non-ports source: how to handle QT3?

On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:40:29 -0700 (PDT) Beeblebrox zap...@berentweb.com wrote: I'm trying to compile pdfedit from github (not in ports tree). configure gives this error: ./configure --with-t1-library=${LOCALBASE}/lib -with-t1-includes=${LOCALBASE}/include checking for QT qmake... configure:

Re: sqlite3 breakage

On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:28:08 +0100 John freebsd-po...@potato.growveg.org wrote: sqlite3 appears to be breaking things in multiple places. using generic amd64 r273255 and ports 371178 I get errors like this whenever sqlite3 is called as a dependency. So, in

Re: sqlite3 breakage

On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 19:21:38 +0100 John freebsd-li...@potato.growveg.org wrote: Hello, that was quick! :D Check that you have these files in /usr/local/lib: libsqlite3.a libsqlite3.so libsqlite3.so.0 libsqlite3.so.0.8.6 If any are missing then make sure you have the latest

Re: On Docs option and custom build target

On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 23:54:19 +0200 Fernando Apesteguía fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Tijl Coosemans t...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 23:23:31 +0200 Fernando Apesteguía fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com wrote: I have a Makefile for an application

Re: On Docs option and custom build target

On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 23:23:31 +0200 Fernando Apesteguía fernando.apesteg...@gmail.com wrote: I have a Makefile for an application that provides both examples and documentation. I created the two options in the Makefile (both enabled by default). The package doesn't provide any flags stock like

Re: x11/libXcm: r351936 and using libtool

On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 22:07:58 +0400 Boris Samorodov b...@passap.ru wrote: Hi Tijl, All, The revision 351936 only bumped PORTREVISION. Assume that USES=libtool:keepla should be added too. Now, AFAIK no port uses those *.la file I try to go to USES=libtool. However I get: - libtool:

Re: Can't build lang/gcc port on i386: segmentation fault

On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 17:26:24 +0400 Andrey Chernov a...@freebsd.org wrote: On 12.09.2014 17:06, Andrey Chernov wrote: On 12.09.2014 16:42, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Andrey Chernov wrote: As I just found, it builds with BOOTSTRAP nice, so apparently clang makes some damage. You

  1   2   3   >