Re: FreeBSD Port: gtkyahoo-0.18.3_4

2008-10-23 Thread Tim Clewlow
> I installed the package of this port. > Did a rehash from the command line and then startx. > Can't find it in the gnome desktop. > What should I do? The sourceforge page for this project says "GTKyahoo project was closed down on February 27, 2003." http://gtkyahoo.sourceforge.net/ You may hav

print/acroread8

2008-09-21 Thread Tim Clewlow
Hello, # uname -a FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #0: Sun Sep 21 13:28:51 EST 2008 I just installed print/acroread8 from a ports tree that is about 1-2 days old (depending on your time zone). The plugin for firefox (mozilla) was installed to: /root/.mozilla/plugins/nppdf.so When I did: nsplugginwrapper

Re: Correct way to portupgrade php5 and php5-extensions-1.1 ?

2008-09-09 Thread Tim Clewlow
> Pine Digital Security Support wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Following the most recent update of PHP5 (5.2.6_2) and subsequent >> portaudit warnings for 5.2.6, I've been upgrading lang/php5 and >> lang/php5-extensions-1.1 on a number of machines. >> >> My question is, what is the best way to do this. So

Re: make package-recursive question

2008-01-21 Thread Tim Clewlow
--- Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tim Clewlow wrote: > > Hello, > > > > If I do "make package-recursive" on a port then it first tries to install the > > port. This causes it to fail if the port is already installed. However, if I &g

make package-recursive question

2008-01-21 Thread Tim Clewlow
Hello, If I do "make package-recursive" on a port then it first tries to install the port. This causes it to fail if the port is already installed. However, if I deinstall the port, and then make package-recursive, it installs the port, makes the port package, and (this is the important part) quit

Re: HOW-TO get Flash7 working!

2008-01-17 Thread Tim Clewlow
--- Jeremy Messenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:21:47 -0600, Michal Varga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 20:24 +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > > >> Please, prove that you are right. Or do you want to receive a hammer > >> without doing i

Re: HOW-TO get Flash7 working!

2008-01-16 Thread Tim Clewlow
--- Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:10:15 -0500 Chuck Robey wrote: > > > >> All those libraries need to be found > >> by the flash9 plugin library. > > > > Please, give me strict inst

Re: Limitations of Ports System

2008-01-11 Thread Tim Clewlow
--- Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 13/12/2007, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just wonder if you asked the general population, whether they'd rather > > have ports or packages, I bet most would vote for packages, aside from > > those that actually like watching the compilation outp

Re: Xorg meta ports bloated dependencies

2007-12-01 Thread Tim Clewlow
--- "Aryeh M. Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Andrei Kolu wrote: > > Saturday 01 December 2007 11:08:28 kirjutas Yuri Pankov: > >> Andrei Kolu wrote: > >>> Saturday 01 December 2007 05:20:40 kirjutas > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I've

Re: Which "linux emulation" works with which programs or the inverse?

2007-10-24 Thread Tim Clewlow
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm totally confused. I was simply trying to get flash 9 or 7 working > in RELENG7 with which ever version of linux emulation and have been > totally unsuccessful. In this I have been reading several other folks > where in fc4 something works and in fc7 it do

Re: cvsup.au.freebsd.org (Hosted on cvsup.planetmirror.com) issues

2007-04-05 Thread Tim Clewlow
--- Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 08:25:11AM +1000, Christopher Martin wrote: > > I have recently noticed serious issues with collections from the FreeBSD > > source tree maintained on cvsup.au.freebsd.org (cvsup.planetmirror.com), > and > > have sought to c

Re: Porting a Linux application to FreeBSD

2007-02-12 Thread Tim Clewlow
--- Greg 'groggy' Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday, 12 February 2007 at 14:35:34 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > Hello, > > I was referred here by some people in the hackers@ list because I asked > > a porting related question and I should have asked it on this list. > >

Re: Something is really not right with azureus 2.5 / diablo-jdk 1.5

2006-11-30 Thread Tim Clewlow
--- Kostik Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:26:56 +0200 > From: Kostik Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tim Clewlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Something is really not ri

Something is really not right with azureus 2.5 / diablo-jdk 1.5

2006-11-30 Thread Tim Clewlow
--- Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:06:40 -0500 > Subject: Something is really not right with azureus 2.5 / diablo-jdk 1.5 > > > > Hello, > > > > I have azureus-2.5.0.0 which requires

Something is really not right with azureus 2.5 / diablo-jdk 1.5

2006-11-29 Thread Tim Clewlow
Hello, I have azureus-2.5.0.0 which requires diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_1 to build (among other things). It builds and runs fine, however, azureus limps along for about 10 minutes with very low download and upload speeds, then it seems to grind to a halt, the d/l and u/l basically stop. There are no e