On 5/11/13, Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it wrote:
On 05/10/13 15:50, b.f. wrote:
...
Here's what I did:
# find /usr/ports -type f -exec grep -l OPENSS_PORT {} ;
This showed very few ports really requiring openssl from ports, none of
which I had currently installed.
Then the simplest
Andrea wrote:
...
I had a look at /usr/ports/net/openldap23-server/Makefile and only found:
USE_OPENSSL=yes
AFAICT this does not give any preference wrt to base vs port openssl; if
I'm correct this means the port is choosen if installed, but, otherwise,
openssl from base is
On 5/10/13, Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it wrote:
On 05/10/13 14:32, b.f. wrote:
Would I screw too many things if I tried adding:
WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes
Yes, because then the additions to the check-depends target in
ports/Mk/bsd.openssl.mk would cause unsandboxed builds of the port
Ronald wrote:
...
It occurs to me that *something*, i.e. some tool(s) within the FreeBSD
panoply, *must* already be reading and/or otherwise making use of those
MD5 checksums within the +CONTENTS files. Otherwise, why would they even
be there? So my question really comes down to this: What
I received a lot of complaint about ocaml being in a bad shape: lang/ocaml
being
outdated, lots of ocaml ports not being carefully maintained and updated.
I personnally know nothing about ocaml so I'm not able to actually be helpful
to
improve the situation, I would love to see people taking
On 2/13/13, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
From s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Wed Feb 13 03:40:53 2013
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 02:15:08AM +, b.f. wrote:
On 2/13/13, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013
On 2/8/13, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
From bf1...@googlemail.com Fri Feb 8 17:33:09 2013
I don't think it's true.
While still on 9.1 ports, the latest
entry in UPDATING was (well I lost it now)
about NOV-2012. I believe the
On 2/8/13, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk
wrote:
From bf1...@googlemail.com Fri Feb 8 17:33:09 2013
I don't think
Mark wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:51:39AM +, RW wrote:
Reports are sent to ports@ every 2 weeks.
And I wonder how many people read carefully through all 478 entries.
And your suggestion is ... ?
Try ports/ports-mgmt/portupdate-scan.
b.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:48:37AM +, b.f. wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:51:39AM +, RW wrote:
Reports are sent to ports@ every 2 weeks.
And I wonder how many people read carefully through all 478 entries.
And your suggestion is ... ?
Try ports/ports-mgmt/portupdate
Building for acroreadwrapper-0.0.20110920
Warning: Object directory not changed from original
/usr/ports/print/acroreadwrapper/work/linux_adobe_kmod-20110920
@ - /usr/src/sys
machine - /usr/src/sys/i386/include
x86 - /usr/src/sys/x86/include
gcc46 -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4 -mtune=pentium4
Lev wrote:
Now, when some port after update installs new version of shared
library, used by other ports, here are two variants:
(a) To bump versions of all dependant ports (PORTREVISION=${PORTREVISION} +
1)
(b) Don't touch other ports, but add copy'n'pasted item into
UPDATING
Michael wrote:
Dear FreeBSD community,
2 months ago I submitted four port updates related to the
ocaml/language. The PRs used to be listed by portsmon but I recently
noticed they disappeared. [1]
How can I help to let these changes go into our ports tree?
The four PRs are
2012/11/04
13 matches
Mail list logo
