Synopsis: update devel/zookeeper
Responsible-Changed-From-To: gnn-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: gnn
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Mar 10 13:43:30 UTC 2014
Responsible-Changed-Why:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=179004
___
freebsd-ports
Synopsis: update devel/zookeeper
Responsible-Changed-From-To: ports-skreuzer
Responsible-Changed-By: gnn
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Mar 10 13:44:08 UTC 2014
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Assign to Steven Kreuzer.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=179004
I think this port should be gone as it's now part of py-pcs.
Best,
George
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At Wed, 7 Mar 2007 17:21:43 - (UTC),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, but here is the problem. I have updated the package for use with
PCS, and Doug Song has not as yet added those bits. This is kinda a
fork, but I am feeding him the changes etc. Can we either:
1) update the PCS port
At Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:00:52 GMT,
Bill distfiles Fenner wrote:
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],
You are listed as the FreeBSD port maintainer for 1 port
whose distfiles are not fetchable from their MASTER_SITES. Could
you please visit
http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/[EMAIL
This needs to go to ports@ not net@
Thanks,
George
At Thu, 01 Mar 2007 12:16:09 +0100,
Le Cocq Michel wrote:
Yesterday I try to install a python module after a 'portsnap fetch
update', during the install python upgrade from version 2.4.3,1 to 2.4.4,1.
python-2.4.3,1 The meta-port for
At Wed, 7 Feb 2007 10:01:25 GMT,
Bill distfiles Fenner wrote:
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],
You are listed as the FreeBSD port maintainer for 1 port
whose distfiles are not fetchable from their MASTER_SITES. Could
you please visit
http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/[EMAIL
Howdy,
On this page:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/plist-autoplist.html
the plist script is mentioned as a way to get the plist for a port
built somewhat automatically. What the page does not mention is that
the script in question,
