Re: /usr/ports/Mk/Uses/execinfo.mk and r450351

2017-09-24 Thread Keith Hellman
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 06:44:22PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: > There is something funny going on with your copy of the ports tree. My > copy is currently at r450422 and I looked at Makefile for the first two That's what I thought might be the case :( Thanks for setting me straight. -- Keith Hell

Re: /usr/ports/Mk/Uses/execinfo.mk and r450351

2017-09-24 Thread Don Lewis
On 24 Sep, Keith Hellman wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm running > > FreeBSD dane.localdomain 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r320599 > > with a ports tree synced with svn and package update management with > portmaster(8). I synced the tree up to 450554 today and portmaster > spat out th

/usr/ports/Mk/Uses/execinfo.mk and r450351

2017-09-24 Thread Keith Hellman
Hello all, I'm running FreeBSD dane.localdomain 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r320599 with a ports tree synced with svn and package update management with portmaster(8). I synced the tree up to 450554 today and portmaster spat out the following. /usr/ports# portmaster -m BATCH=yes