Vasil Dimov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 12:48:18AM +1000, Nick Withers wrote:
>> Hey guys!
>>
>> Sorry if this has already been pointed out a million or so
>> times, but the latest update of the ports UPDATING file (re:
>> zabbix) is listed as having been made on the 20061010. Being
>> the 200
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 12:48:18AM +1000, Nick Withers wrote:
> Hey guys!
Hi Nick
>
> Sorry if this has already been pointed out a million or so
> times, but the latest update of the ports UPDATING file (re:
> zabbix) is listed as having been made on the 20061010. Being
> the 2006-09-21 at the ti
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 12:48:18AM +1000, Nick Withers wrote:
> Hey guys!
>
> Sorry if this has already been pointed out a million or so
> times, but the latest update of the ports UPDATING file (re:
> zabbix) is listed as having been made on the 20061010. Being
> the 2006-09-21 at the time of wri
Hey guys!
Sorry if this has already been pointed out a million or so
times, but the latest update of the ports UPDATING file (re:
zabbix) is listed as having been made on the 20061010. Being
the 2006-09-21 at the time of writing, methings there was a
mistake made there which if someone with godly
