Re: [CFdiscussion] ports and FORTIFY_SOURCE

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 01:34:06PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Dear ports developers; > > This year I mentored Oliver Pinter's GSoC project [1] to port > FORTIFY_SOURCE to FreeBSD. The project was more complex than we > thought initially but it was successful. > > For those of you that haven't

Re: [CFdiscussion] ports and FORTIFY_SOURCE

Hello; On 09/02/15 10:12, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 01:34:06PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Dear ports developers; This year I mentored Oliver Pinter's GSoC project [1] to port FORTIFY_SOURCE to FreeBSD. The project was more complex than we thought initially but it was

Re: [CFdiscussion] ports and FORTIFY_SOURCE

On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 17:12:39 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin wrote > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 01:34:06PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > Dear ports developers; > > > > This year I mentored Oliver Pinter's GSoC project [1] to port > > FORTIFY_SOURCE to FreeBSD. The project was more

Re: [CFdiscussion] ports and FORTIFY_SOURCE

Thanks ! On 09/02/15 00:24, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! There are currently two remaining PRs with patches for mail/ifile (202572) and net-p2p/namecoin (2012603), getting those committed soon would avoid traumas in the ports tree once FORTIFY_SOURCE is committed. 202603: done There are some

Re: [CFdiscussion] ports and FORTIFY_SOURCE

Hi! > There are currently two remaining PRs with patches for mail/ifile > (202572) and net-p2p/namecoin (2012603), getting those committed soon > would avoid traumas in the ports tree once FORTIFY_SOURCE is committed. 202603: done -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372

[CFdiscussion] ports and FORTIFY_SOURCE

Dear ports developers; This year I mentored Oliver Pinter's GSoC project [1] to port FORTIFY_SOURCE to FreeBSD. The project was more complex than we thought initially but it was successful. For those of you that haven't heard of it, it's a trick supported by libc to enable bounds-checking on

Re: [CFdiscussion] ports and FORTIFY_SOURCE

Hi! > There are currently two remaining PRs with patches for mail/ifile > (202572) and net-p2p/namecoin (2012603), getting those committed soon > would avoid traumas in the ports tree once FORTIFY_SOURCE is committed. 202572: done. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372

Re: [CFdiscussion] ports and FORTIFY_SOURCE

Hi! On 8/31/15, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> There are currently two remaining PRs with patches for mail/ifile >> (202572) and net-p2p/namecoin (2012603), getting those committed soon >> would avoid traumas in the ports tree once FORTIFY_SOURCE is committed. > > 202572: done.