Re: [HEADS UP] FreeBSD Ports tree has been tagged with RELEASE_7_EOL

2013-03-07 Thread Jan Beich
Thomas Abthorpe portmgr-secret...@freebsd.org writes: - We do not require committers/maintainers to support 7.x, although ports will need to be marked as BROKEN/IGNORE if they do not build/run. Why not add an entry to UPDATING and teach portsnap(8) about EOLTIME? # a sample text based

Re: [HEADS UP] FreeBSD Ports tree has been tagged with RELEASE_7_EOL

2013-03-07 Thread René Ladan
On 03/07/13 11:08, Jan Beich wrote: Thomas Abthorpe portmgr-secret...@freebsd.org writes: - We do not require committers/maintainers to support 7.x, although ports will need to be marked as BROKEN/IGNORE if they do not build/run. Why not add an entry to UPDATING and teach portsnap(8) about

[FreeBSD-Ports-Announce] [HEADS UP] FreeBSD Ports tree has been tagged with RELEASE_7_EOL

2013-03-06 Thread Thomas Abthorpe
The FreeBSD Ports Management Team wishes to remind users that February 28 was the end of support for the Ports Collection for both FreeBSD 7.4 RELEASE and the FreeBSD 7.x STABLE branch. Neither the infrastructure nor individual ports are guaranteed to work on these FreeBSD versions after that

[HEADS UP] FreeBSD Ports tree has been tagged with RELEASE_7_EOL

2013-03-06 Thread Thomas Abthorpe
The FreeBSD Ports Management Team wishes to remind users that February 28 was the end of support for the Ports Collection for both FreeBSD 7.4 RELEASE and the FreeBSD 7.x STABLE branch. Neither the infrastructure nor individual ports are guaranteed to work on these FreeBSD versions after that