Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
The hard part is to get ports writers to think the right way about
DESTDIR after ignoring it for so many years. And once you decide to
go about fixing it, there's no way around that problem.
My
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
The hard part is to get ports writers to think the right way about
DESTDIR after ignoring it for so many years. And once you decide to
go about fixing it, there's no way around that problem.
My preferred solution involves a couple
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:55:20PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
The hard part is to get ports writers to think the right way about
DESTDIR after ignoring it for so many
Kris Kennaway wrote at 13:36 -0400 on Aug 16, 2006:
mount_nullfs ${PORTSDIR} ${DESTDIR}${PORTSDIR}
mount_nullfs ${WRKDIR} ${DESTDIR}${WRKDIR}
mount_devfs foo ${DESTDIR}/dev
chroot ${DESTDIR} cd ${.CURDIR} make install
A suitable version of the above should allow all ports to be
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 08:14:08PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:55:20PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
The hard part is to get ports writers
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 08:14:08PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:55:20PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600, John E Hein wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 01:35:22PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 08:14:08PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:55:20PM +0200, G?bor K?vesd?n wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:50PM -0600,
Gábor Kövesdán wrote:
if we can work this out a bit better, my progress so far
would become pointless...
Not at all! If I had a dollar for every Good Idea(TM) that I had which ended
up leading me down a completely different road, I'd be retired now. These
are not easy problems, and the fact
* Doug Barton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
if we can work this out a bit better, my progress so far
would become pointless...
Not at all! If I had a dollar for every Good Idea(TM) that I had which ended
up leading me down a completely different road, I'd be retired now. These
are not easy
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 12:20:09AM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
* Both current and nullfs-drived DESTDIR implementations require all
depends in the DESTDIR. But actually BUILD_DEPENDS from host can be
used.
This should already be the case with the current implementation and also
will
Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
What I propose is:
- Change variable naming scheme.
All *BASE and *DIR vars should be reverted to their original meanings
(i.e. local paths). Instead, INSTALL_ vars should be introduced:
INSTALL_LOCALBASE=${DESTDIR}/${LOCALBASE}
INSTALL_X11BASE=${DESTDIR}/${X11BASE}
Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Hi!
I'm now exploring new DESTDIR-related stuff, and I find it far from
being useable. More of that, DESTDIR-related changes seem dangerous
to me.
As far as I understand, for port to support DESTDIR, it's files
should be installed into ${DESTDIR}/${PREFIX}/foo (aka
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
What I propose is:
- Change variable naming scheme.
All *BASE and *DIR vars should be reverted to their original meanings
(i.e. local paths). Instead, INSTALL_ vars should be introduced:
INSTALL_LOCALBASE=${DESTDIR}/${LOCALBASE}
* G??bor K??vesd??n ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I agree with every your word.
I was to implement it in this way, but as I said this would require us
to change all of the *_DEPENDS lines. Erwin told me that this can't be
happen, so I was pushed to go the another way. Erwin is in portmgr, and
Gábor Kövesdán wrote at 11:32 +0200 on Aug 15, 2006:
Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Now, I think the way DESTDIR-related changes were done to bsd.port.mk is
absolutely wrong. For example, X11BASE, LOCALBASE, DATADIR now contain
DESTDIR. But, these variables are frequently used when changing
Hi!
I'm now exploring new DESTDIR-related stuff, and I find it far from
being useable. More of that, DESTDIR-related changes seem dangerous
to me.
As far as I understand, for port to support DESTDIR, it's files
should be installed into ${DESTDIR}/${PREFIX}/foo (aka ${TARGETDIR}/foo),
but all
So now that Dmitry sounded a sober thought, I'll give a one
of my own.
I would rather see PREFIX respect DESTDIR and go through
all the pains of respecting PREFIX. This way we reach a
double cause:
* ensure PREFIX is respected (this will reveal thousands of
erring ports, but it will be worth
17 matches
Mail list logo
