On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:49:37PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> How is that even possible? I committed the fix on Oct 12, 2016:
>
> Maybe you are seeing a different problem altogether?
Perhaps. Along that line, I've submitted Bug 218782. Hope it was
done correctlythe diagnostic files
On 19 Apr 2017, at 00:17, bob prohaska wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 09:43:23PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote:
>>
>> See bug 211069 which was duped against bug 203989 that triggered a
>> different assertion. The above error did show up on armv6 buildbot[1]
>> but nowadays is
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 09:43:23PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote:
>
> See bug 211069 which was duped against bug 203989 that triggered a
> different assertion. The above error did show up on armv6 buildbot[1]
> but nowadays is blocked by other ports.
>
What is meant by the term "blocked by other
On 18 Apr 2017, at 21:43, Jan Beich wrote:
>
> Dimitry Andric writes:
>
>> On 18 Apr 2017, at 20:47, bob prohaska wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> For some time (years?) firefox compiles have failed with an error message
>>> along the lines of
>>>
Dimitry Andric writes:
> On 18 Apr 2017, at 20:47, bob prohaska wrote:
>
>>
>> For some time (years?) firefox compiles have failed with an error message
>> along the lines of
>>
>> Assertion failed: (isReg() && "This is not a register operand!"),
>>
On 18 Apr 2017, at 20:47, bob prohaska wrote:
>
> For some time (years?) firefox compiles have failed with an error message
> along the lines of
>
> Assertion failed: (isReg() && "This is not a register operand!"), function
> getReg, file
For some time (years?) firefox compiles have failed with an error message
along the lines of
Assertion failed: (isReg() && "This is not a register operand!"), function
getReg, file /usr/src/contrib/llvm/include/llvm/MC/MCInst.h, line 64.
c++: error: unable to execute command: Abort trap (core