On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> JFYI. There is 0.9.6 already.
The core Salt team is in LA at SCaLE this weekend and getting a lot of
attention. We rolled 0.9.6 last night in the hotel lobby, but I've
been so busy with conference stuff I haven't updated the port yet,
Christer Edwards wrote on 20.01.2012 19:09:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
I've been evaluating salt, and would prefer not to deploy prior to the
msgpack update in 0.9.5.
I am hoping to get the port updated today, yes. Thanks for the
additional nudge to get it finished :)
On 01/20/2012 07:09, Christer Edwards wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> I've been evaluating salt, and would prefer not to deploy prior to the
>> msgpack update in 0.9.5.
>
> I am hoping to get the port updated today, yes. Thanks for the
> additional nudge to get it
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> I've been evaluating salt, and would prefer not to deploy prior to the
> msgpack update in 0.9.5.
I am hoping to get the port updated today, yes. Thanks for the
additional nudge to get it finished :)
christer
_
I've been evaluating salt, and would prefer not to deploy prior to the
msgpack update in 0.9.5.
Doug
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetS
