I'd rather keep the subject on topic about archiving
the final quarterly package builds [1] in variously
accessible ways for varied lengths of time.
Please pull the convo on overall ports strategy
into a different subject.
[1] Or the finals / checkpoints of whatever
strategies are in place into
Hi!
> >>> I've asked for this but the answer is
> >>> "no we don't do that.. and have no plans to".
> >> What is the rationale?
> > I don't know, but as the setup of your own package builder box
> > is simple enough -- wouldn't that be an alternative for you ?
> If the answer is always "don't
On 3/8/18 11:17 am, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
I've asked for this but the answer is
"no we don't do that.. and have no plans to".
What is the rationale?
I don't know, but as the setup of your own package builder box
is simple enough -- wouldn't that be an alternative for you ?
If the answer is
> And many 10s of GB which we would be forcing all the mirrors to carry
> (and remember, *N archs *n OSVERSIONS).
> This has been cited as a stopper in the past.
There's enough slack to pull down at least one
new quarter, how deep that slack goes hasn't
been chimed in on but this was copied out
Van: grarpamp
Datum: donderdag, 2 augustus 2018 22:21
Aan: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
CC: freebsd-...@freebsd.org
Onderwerp: Re: Archives of last quarterly package builds?
> I've asked for this but the answer is
> "no we don't do that.. and have no plans to".
What
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:17 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> as the setup of your own package builder box
> is simple enough -- wouldn't that be an alternative for you ?
Simple and even done. Yet being local, that wouldn't cover others out
there who might have found or thought of similar or additional
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 6:48 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> This was discussed in a long thread last June:
>
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2017-June/109126.html
>
> Short answer: we don't have enough resources.
The OP there titles and suggests opening more development
branches,
Hi!
> > I've asked for this but the answer is
> > "no we don't do that.. and have no plans to".
>
> What is the rationale?
I don't know, but as the setup of your own package builder box
is simple enough -- wouldn't that be an alternative for you ?
--
p...@freebsd.org +49 171 3101372
> I've asked for this but the answer is
> "no we don't do that.. and have no plans to".
What is the rationale? Or is another model of pkg build,
distribution, and archiving coming?
It seems no more would be needed than
- an update to release / handbook / mirror info noting their status
as
On 22/7/18 5:59 am, grarpamp wrote:
Packages are delivered via a single quarterly label here
https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:11:amd64/quarterly/
which corresponds to the latest quarterly branch label here
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/branches/?sortby=date#dirlist
However, similar to how
Packages are delivered via a single quarterly label here
https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:11:amd64/quarterly/
which corresponds to the latest quarterly branch label here
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/branches/?sortby=date#dirlist
However, similar to how the tags here
11 matches
Mail list logo
