Am 13.09.2013 21:11, schrieb olli hauer:
> On 2013-09-12 12:57, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'd like to start a discussion on changing the default BDB port from 4.1
>> to something more recent.
>>
>> bdb version 4.1 was last released in 2002:
>> README: Sleepycat Software: Berkeley DB 4.1.25:
On 13.09.2013, at 21:56, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> On 13-set-2013, at 21:01, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> On 12.09.2013, at 13:34, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>> Yes, I've had WITH_BDB_VER?=48 in my standard /etc/make.conf
>>
>> Please excuse my ignorance, but I couldn't find the meaning of
>> that '?'. Does
On 13-set-2013, at 21:01, Michael Grimm wrote:
> On 12.09.2013, at 13:34, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
>> Yes, I've had WITH_BDB_VER?=48 in my standard /etc/make.conf
>
> Please excuse my ignorance, but I couldn't find the meaning of
> that '?'. Does that stand for "*at least* version db48"? Or?
Set
On 2013-09-12 12:57, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to start a discussion on changing the default BDB port from 4.1
> to something more recent.
>
> bdb version 4.1 was last released in 2002:
> README: Sleepycat Software: Berkeley DB 4.1.25: (December 19, 2002)
>
> There are some ports w
On 12.09.2013, at 13:34, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Yes, I've had WITH_BDB_VER?=48 in my standard /etc/make.conf
Please excuse my ignorance, but I couldn't find the meaning of
that '?'. Does that stand for "*at least* version db48"? Or?
Thanks in advance,
Michael
12.09.2013 13:57, Ivan Voras wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to start a discussion on changing the default BDB port from 4.1
to something more recent.
bdb version 4.1 was last released in 2002:
README: Sleepycat Software: Berkeley DB 4.1.25: (December 19, 2002)
There are some ports which have an unexpe
On 12/09/2013 13:09, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:57:06PM +0200 I heard the voice of
> Ivan Voras, and lo! it spake thus:
>>
>> And while the argument seems valid, it also doesn't have an estimate
>> of which / how many ports will break with a more recent bdb.
>
> FWIW, I'
On 9/12/2013 13:09, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:57:06PM +0200 I heard the voice of
> Ivan Voras, and lo! it spake thus:
>>
>> And while the argument seems valid, it also doesn't have an estimate
>> of which / how many ports will break with a more recent bdb.
>
> FWIW, I'v
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:57:06PM +0200 I heard the voice of
Ivan Voras, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> And while the argument seems valid, it also doesn't have an estimate
> of which / how many ports will break with a more recent bdb.
FWIW, I've manually pushed all the systems I've managed to highe
Hello,
I'd like to start a discussion on changing the default BDB port from 4.1
to something more recent.
bdb version 4.1 was last released in 2002:
README: Sleepycat Software: Berkeley DB 4.1.25: (December 19, 2002)
There are some ports which have an unexpected dependacy on bdb via APR
(apache2
10 matches
Mail list logo