Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port??

2017-03-11 Thread Bob Willcox
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 04:14:03AM -0800, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 8 March 2017 at 08:04, Bob Willcox wrote: > > What is the best way to get synth to simply ignore certain ports when > > running > > the upgrade-system command with it? I would like for it to not upgrade > >

Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port??

2017-03-11 Thread Eitan Adler
On 8 March 2017 at 08:04, Bob Willcox wrote: > What is the best way to get synth to simply ignore certain ports when running > the upgrade-system command with it? I would like for it to not upgrade firefox > (don't want to lose my tab groups) so I'd rather that it not even

Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port??

2017-03-10 Thread Chris H
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:34:45 + Matthew Seaman wrote > On 2017/03/08 16:04, Bob Willcox wrote: > > Note that I haven't tried ver 52 of firefox, but from what I've read it > > sounds like all plugins/addons other than flash are no longer supported. I think the answer to

Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port??

2017-03-09 Thread Bob Willcox
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:21:55PM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 03:13:37PM -0600 I heard the voice of > Bob Willcox, and lo! it spake thus: > > > > Hmm, the plugin/addon I use and would be lost without is for tab > > groups. Do they still work in 52? > > I'm pretty

Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port??

2017-03-08 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 03:13:37PM -0600 I heard the voice of Bob Willcox, and lo! it spake thus: > > Hmm, the plugin/addon I use and would be lost without is for tab > groups. Do they still work in 52? I'm pretty sure it's 57 (or 58?) that they're getting broken. Certainly they work fine here

Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port??

2017-03-08 Thread Walter Schwarzenfeld
The best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port is mark th port as broken. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port??

2017-03-08 Thread Jan Beich
Freddie Cash writes: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Bob Willcox wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:40:11AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: >> > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Bob Willcox wrote: >> > >> > > What is the best way to get

Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port??

2017-03-08 Thread Freddie Cash
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Bob Willcox wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:40:11AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > > > What is the best way to get synth to simply ignore certain ports when > > >

Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port??

2017-03-08 Thread Bob Willcox
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 12:31:51PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:40:11AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > > > > > What

Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port??

2017-03-08 Thread Jan Beich
Kevin Oberman writes: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Lars Engels wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:34:45PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> > On 2017/03/08 16:04, Bob Willcox wrote: >> > > Note that I haven't tried ver 52 of firefox, but from

Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port??

2017-03-08 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Bob Willcox wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:40:11AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > > > What is the best way to get synth to simply ignore certain ports when > > >

Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port??

2017-03-08 Thread Bob Willcox
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:40:11AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > What is the best way to get synth to simply ignore certain ports when > > running > > the upgrade-system command with it? I would like for it to not upgrade >

Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port??

2017-03-08 Thread Freddie Cash
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Bob Willcox wrote: > What is the best way to get synth to simply ignore certain ports when > running > the upgrade-system command with it? I would like for it to not upgrade > firefox > (don't want to lose my tab groups) so I'd rather that it not

Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port??

2017-03-08 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Lars Engels wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:34:45PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 2017/03/08 16:04, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > Note that I haven't tried ver 52 of firefox, but from what I've read > it sounds > > > like all

Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port??

2017-03-08 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 2017/03/08 16:04, Bob Willcox wrote: > Note that I haven't tried ver 52 of firefox, but from what I've read it sounds > like all plugins/addons other than flash are no longer supported. Make that: all *NPAPI* plugins other than Flash are now unsupported. That's stuff like the Java plugin or

Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port??

2017-03-08 Thread Lars Engels
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:34:45PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 2017/03/08 16:04, Bob Willcox wrote: > > Note that I haven't tried ver 52 of firefox, but from what I've read it > > sounds > > like all plugins/addons other than flash are no longer supported. > > Make that: all *NPAPI*

Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port??

2017-03-08 Thread Bob Willcox
What is the best way to get synth to simply ignore certain ports when running the upgrade-system command with it? I would like for it to not upgrade firefox (don't want to lose my tab groups) so I'd rather that it not even consider updating firefox again, at least not till some form of tab groups