Re: CC, CPP etc vs CONFIGURE_ENV

2013-11-06 Thread Andrew W. Nosenko
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Charles Swiger wrote: > On Nov 6, 2013, at 7:25 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> Setting $CC and such worked with older ./configure which didn't implement >>> $CONFIGURE_ENV. >>> It also plays more nicely with things which roll their own ./configure as a >>> shim >>>

Re: CC, CPP etc vs CONFIGURE_ENV

2013-11-06 Thread Charles Swiger
On Nov 6, 2013, at 7:25 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> Setting $CC and such worked with older ./configure which didn't implement >> $CONFIGURE_ENV. >> It also plays more nicely with things which roll their own ./configure as a >> shim >> that isn't actually GNU autoconf. > > Apologies, you seem to

Re: CC, CPP etc vs CONFIGURE_ENV

2013-11-06 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 06/11/2013 17:11 Charles Swiger said the following: > Hi-- > > On Nov 6, 2013, at 6:27 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> I wonder why do-configure target explicitly sets things like CC="${CC}" >> CPP="${CPP}" etc in configure script environment as opposed to them just >> being >> placed into CONFIGU

Re: CC, CPP etc vs CONFIGURE_ENV

2013-11-06 Thread Charles Swiger
Hi-- On Nov 6, 2013, at 6:27 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > I wonder why do-configure target explicitly sets things like CC="${CC}" > CPP="${CPP}" etc in configure script environment as opposed to them just being > placed into CONFIGURE_ENV. > What is the technical reason? Setting $CC and such worked

CC, CPP etc vs CONFIGURE_ENV

2013-11-06 Thread Andriy Gapon
I wonder why do-configure target explicitly sets things like CC="${CC}" CPP="${CPP}" etc in configure script environment as opposed to them just being placed into CONFIGURE_ENV. What is the technical reason? -- Andriy Gapon ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org