Hello,
I've spent the last few hours porting CentOS 6.6 to FreeBSD.
Given RHEL6 (and derived CentOS 6.x) policy of no-surprises, it was pretty easy
to bump those versions that actually did change.
I've tested it with poudriere locally, verified that Skype still works ;-),
and would be happy if y
On 11/04/2014 15:41, Johannes Meixner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've spent the last few hours porting CentOS 6.6 to FreeBSD.
>
> Given RHEL6 (and derived CentOS 6.x) policy of no-surprises, it was pretty
> easy
> to bump those versions that actually did change.
>
> I've tested it with poudriere locally,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 04:14:05PM -0500, Kris Moore wrote:
> Does running skype require the lemul branch still, or what minimum
> version of FreeBSD?
It's a variant of Skype 4.2.0.13 which disguises itself as 4.3.0.37. So,
actually, neither (yet). It's been floating around on IRC, mostly.
--
On 11/05/2014 00:07, Johannes Meixner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 04:14:05PM -0500, Kris Moore wrote:
>> Does running skype require the lemul branch still, or what minimum
>> version of FreeBSD?
> It's a variant of Skype 4.2.0.13 which disguises itself as 4.3.0.37. So,
> actually, neither (yet
On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 01:42:35 -0500
Kris Moore wrote:
> On 11/05/2014 00:07, Johannes Meixner wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 04:14:05PM -0500, Kris Moore wrote:
> >> Does running skype require the lemul branch still, or what minimum
> >> version of FreeBSD?
> > It's a variant of Skype 4.2.0.1
On 11/05/2014 13:28, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 01:42:35 -0500
> Kris Moore wrote:
>
>> On 11/05/2014 00:07, Johannes Meixner wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 04:14:05PM -0500, Kris Moore wrote:
Does running skype require the lemul branch still, or what minimum
vers
On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:21:36 -0500
Kris Moore wrote:
> On 11/05/2014 13:28, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
> > On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 01:42:35 -0500
> > Kris Moore wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/05/2014 00:07, Johannes Meixner wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 04:14:05PM -0500, Kris Moore wrote:
> Does r
On 11/05/2014 14:24, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:21:36 -0500
> Kris Moore wrote:
>
>> On 11/05/2014 13:28, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
>>> On Wed, 05 Nov 2014 01:42:35 -0500
>>> Kris Moore wrote:
>>>
On 11/05/2014 00:07, Johannes Meixner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 a