CFT Chromium 15.0.874.92

2011-10-16 Thread George Liaskos
Hello, http://cybertron.gr/chromium-20111016.tar.xz http://cybertron.gr/chromium-15.0.874.92.tbz ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr..

Re: CFT Chromium 15.0.874.92

2011-10-16 Thread George Liaskos
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 5:34 PM, George Liaskos wrote: > Hello, > > http://cybertron.gr/chromium-20111016.tar.xz > http://cybertron.gr/chromium-15.0.874.92.tbz > Meh, sorry about that. I pushed send by mistake. What i meant to write was : please test Chromium 15.0.874.92 :) There are many peopl

Re: CFT Chromium 15.0.874.92

2011-10-16 Thread Zhihao Yuan
Tested, no problem, with all acceleration + flash enabled. Thanks! On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 9:41 AM, George Liaskos wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 5:34 PM, George Liaskos > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > http://cybertron.gr/chromium-20111016.tar.xz > > http://cybertron.gr/chromium-15.0.874.92.tbz >

Re: CFT Chromium 15.0.874.92

2011-10-16 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
George Liaskos wrote on 16.10.2011 18:41: On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 5:34 PM, George Liaskos wrote: Hello, http://cybertron.gr/chromium-20111016.tar.xz http://cybertron.gr/chromium-15.0.874.92.tbz Meh, sorry about that. I pushed send by mistake. What i meant to write was : please test Chromiu

Re: CFT Chromium 15.0.874.92

2011-10-16 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on 17.10.2011 08:30: George Liaskos wrote on 16.10.2011 18:41: On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 5:34 PM, George Liaskos wrote: Hello, http://cybertron.gr/chromium-20111016.tar.xz http://cybertron.gr/chromium-15.0.874.92.tbz Meh, sorry about that. I pushed send by mistake.

Re: CFT Chromium 15.0.874.92

2011-10-18 Thread Alexander Best
On Sun Oct 16 11, George Liaskos wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 5:34 PM, George Liaskos wrote: > > Hello, > > > > http://cybertron.gr/chromium-20111016.tar.xz > > http://cybertron.gr/chromium-15.0.874.92.tbz > > > > Meh, sorry about that. I pushed send by mistake. > > What i meant to write was

Re: CFT Chromium 15.0.874.92

2011-10-18 Thread George Liaskos
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Alexander Best wrote: > On Sun Oct 16 11, George Liaskos wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 5:34 PM, George Liaskos >> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > http://cybertron.gr/chromium-20111016.tar.xz >> > http://cybertron.gr/chromium-15.0.874.92.tbz >> > >> >> Meh, sorry

Re: CFT Chromium 15.0.874.92

2011-10-18 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
George Liaskos wrote on 18.10.2011 16:16: On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Alexander Best wrote: On Sun Oct 16 11, George Liaskos wrote: On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 5:34 PM, George Liaskos wrote: Hello, http://cybertron.gr/chromium-20111016.tar.xz http://cybertron.gr/chromium-15.0.874.92.tbz

Re: CFT Chromium 15.0.874.92

2011-10-18 Thread George Liaskos
> Yes, all is fine here. And i didn't used libtool-fixed and UNAME_r hack for > building. Using stock gcc and default options (CODECS,GCONF). Chromium does not need any hack to compile, what i don't know is the state of devel/google-perftools on CURRENT. Compiling a jail right now. __

Re: CFT Chromium 15.0.874.92

2011-10-18 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
George Liaskos wrote on 18.10.2011 17:22: Yes, all is fine here. And i didn't used libtool-fixed and UNAME_r hack for building. Using stock gcc and default options (CODECS,GCONF). Chromium does not need any hack to compile, what i don't know is the state of devel/google-perftools on CURRENT. C

Re: CFT Chromium 15.0.874.92

2011-10-18 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Oct 18 11, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > George Liaskos wrote on 18.10.2011 17:22: > >>Yes, all is fine here. And i didn't used libtool-fixed and UNAME_r hack > >>for > >>building. Using stock gcc and default options (CODECS,GCONF). > > > >Chromium does not need any hack to compile, what i d

Re: CFT Chromium 15.0.874.92

2011-10-18 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Alexander Best wrote on 18.10.2011 19:28: On Tue Oct 18 11, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: George Liaskos wrote on 18.10.2011 17:22: Yes, all is fine here. And i didn't used libtool-fixed and UNAME_r hack for building. Using stock gcc and default options (CODECS,GCONF). Chromium does not need any

Re: CFT Chromium 15.0.874.92

2011-10-18 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Oct 18 11, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Alexander Best wrote on 18.10.2011 19:28: > >On Tue Oct 18 11, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > >>George Liaskos wrote on 18.10.2011 17:22: > Yes, all is fine here. And i didn't used libtool-fixed and UNAME_r hack > for > building. Using stock