On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:02:47PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
The old Makefile headers, ala:
# New ports collection makefile for:BIND 9.9.x
# Date created: 27 January 2012
# Whom: dougb
#
# $FreeBSD: head/dns/bind99/Makefile 301487
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Thomas Abthorpe tabtho...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:02:47PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
The old Makefile headers, ala:
# New ports collection makefile for:BIND 9.9.x
# Date created: 27 January 2012
# Whom:
On 08/30/2012 09:56 AM, Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
So without further ado, this is what we would like to see at the top of
the makefile
#
# $FreeBSD$
#
PORTNAME=
It is as easy as that :)
I was sort of afraid that would be the answer ... while I realize we
have massive historical
On 08/30/2012 10:09 AM, Steven Kreuzer wrote:
This would make me happy. Another option I would like to throw out there is
to just stick the # $FreeBSD$ at the end of the file so the first line
is PORTNAME=
... also a good suggestion, and further improves the amount of usable
data when you
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:54:17PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote:
On 08/30/2012 09:56 AM, Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
So without further ado, this is what we would like to see at the top of
the makefile
#
# $FreeBSD$
#
PORTNAME=
It is as easy as that :)
I was sort of afraid that
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:09:00PM -0400, Steven Kreuzer wrote:
snip
So without further ado, this is what we would like to see at the top of
the makefile
#
# $FreeBSD$
#
PORTNAME=
It is as easy as that :)
This would make me happy. Another option I would like to throw out
Em 28-08-2012 01:27, Eitan Adler escreveu:
If I understand correctly, you want the idea of multiple maintainers.
I am completely for this. It is even trivial to do by adding a comment
just below the MAINTAINER line.
Or by listing various emails in the MAINTAINER variable, separated by
space.
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:02:47PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
The old Makefile headers, ala:
=20
# New ports collection makefile for:BIND 9.9.x
# Date created: 27 January 2012
# Whom: dougb
#
# $FreeBSD:
On 8/27/2012 7:40 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:02:47PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
The old Makefile headers, ala:
=20
# New ports collection makefile for:BIND 9.9.x
# Date created: 27 January 2012
# Whom:
On 27 August 2012 08:40, Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
On various other older ports, when I couldnt get response in time
from MAINTAINER (I don't mean re hylafax), perhaps maintainer on
holiday, I couldn't wait for send-pr tiem out, didnt want to
invoke send-pr, I fell
Hi,
Reference:
From: Bryan Drewery br...@shatow.net
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 08:02:15 -0500
Message-id: 503b6fd7.4060...@shatow.net
Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 8/27/2012 7:40 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:02:47PM -0700, Doug
Eitan Adler wrote:
On 27 August 2012 08:40, Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
On various other older ports, when I couldnt get response in time
from MAINTAINER (I don't mean re hylafax), perhaps maintainer on
holiday, I couldn't wait for send-pr tiem out, didnt want to
On 27 August 2012 10:23, Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
Eitan Adler wrote:
No,
- eg, If MAINTAINER of hylafax had resigned I would have resumed maintenance.
This is unrelated to you being the original contributor. It is you,
thankfully, being interested in the port. :)
- Creators
On 08/26/12 17:02, Doug Barton wrote:
The old Makefile headers, ala:
# New ports collection makefile for:BIND 9.9.x
# Date created: 27 January 2012
# Whom: dougb
#
# $FreeBSD: head/dns/bind99/Makefile 301487 2012-07-24 19:23:23Z
The old Makefile headers, ala:
# New ports collection makefile for:BIND 9.9.x
# Date created: 27 January 2012
# Whom: dougb
#
# $FreeBSD: head/dns/bind99/Makefile 301487 2012-07-24 19:23:23Z dougb $
have not served a purpose for longer
On 8/26/2012 4:02 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
The old Makefile headers, ala:
# New ports collection makefile for:BIND 9.9.x
# Date created: 27 January 2012
# Whom: dougb
#
# $FreeBSD: head/dns/bind99/Makefile 301487 2012-07-24
On 26 August 2012 22:04, Bryan Drewery br...@shatow.net wrote:
On 8/26/2012 4:02 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
The old Makefile headers, ala:
# New ports collection makefile for:BIND 9.9.x
# Date created: 27 January 2012
# Whom: dougb
#
Am 26.08.2012 23:06, schrieb Chris Rees:
On 26 August 2012 22:04, Bryan Drewery br...@shatow.net wrote:
On 8/26/2012 4:02 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
The old Makefile headers, ala:
# New ports collection makefile for:BIND 9.9.x
# Date created: 27 January 2012
# Whom:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:02:47PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
The old Makefile headers, ala:
# New ports collection makefile for:BIND 9.9.x
# Date created: 27 January 2012
# Whom: dougb
#
# $FreeBSD: head/dns/bind99/Makefile 301487
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Bryan Drewery br...@shatow.net wrote:
If we can't agree to mass delete them with churn, let's at least agree
to remove as we update ports, and in the template for new ports.
as we update ports
Hear hear!
The only sensible suggestion about how to handle it so
20 matches
Mail list logo
