Re: Clean up old PRs

2011-05-18 Thread Florent Thoumie
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Jerry wrote: > I am proposing a new one: > > x - expired >    This report is over 2 years old. If no one has bothered to fix it >    by now, then in all probability no one will. Not gonna happen, for reasons that have been mentioned previously. If you feel a PR

Re: Clean up old PRs

2011-05-17 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi Klaus, looks like you lost, so I restored: cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Reference: > From: "Klaus T. Aehlig" > Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 01:49:10 +0100 > Message-id: <20110517004910.gd94...@curry.linta.de> "Klaus T. Aehlig" wrote: > > Hallo, > > > Might it be more

Re: Clean up old PRs

2011-05-16 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 16.05.2011 14:02, schrieb Jerry: > There are several PRs that are years (literally) old. For example: > > > o 2005/10/13 ports/87397 edwin [patch] incorrect use of PAPERSIZE make > variable in some ports > > Maybe it is time that some o

Re: Clean up old PRs

2011-05-16 Thread Eitan Adler
> I am proposing a new one: > > x - expired >    This report is over 2 years old. If no one has bothered to fix it >    by now, then in all probability no one will. I am very against this proposal. Some bugs have persisted for over a decade, but are still problems (see bin/1375 for an example). As

Re: Clean up old PRs

2011-05-16 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 16/05/2011 13:02, Jerry wrote: > > x - expired > > This report is over 2 years old. If no one has bothered to fix it > > by now, then in all probability no one will. > > I've had PRs committed after spending many years in the queue. Just > because it's old doesn

Re: Clean up old PRs

2011-05-16 Thread Eric
> From: Jerry > Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 08:02:07 -0400 > > There are several PRs that are years (literally) old. For example: > > > o 2005/10/13 ports/87397 edwin [patch] incorrect use of PAPERSIZE make > variable in some ports > > Maybe i

Re: Clean up old PRs

2011-05-16 Thread Chris Rees
On 16 May 2011 13:03, "Jerry" wrote: > > There are several PRs that are years (literally) old. For example: > > > o 2005/10/13 ports/87397 edwin [patch] incorrect use of PAPERSIZE make variable in some ports > > Maybe it is time that some of

Re: Clean up old PRs

2011-05-16 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 16/05/2011 13:02, Jerry wrote: > x - expired > This report is over 2 years old. If no one has bothered to fix it > by now, then in all probability no one will. I've had PRs committed after spending many years in the queue. Just because it's old doesn't mean it's pointless. Closing old

Re: Clean up old PRs

2011-05-16 Thread wen heping
+1 2011/5/16 Jerry : > There are several PRs that are years (literally) old. For example: > > > o 2005/10/13 ports/87397 edwin [patch] incorrect use of PAPERSIZE make > variable in some ports > > Maybe it is time that some of these extremel

Clean up old PRs

2011-05-16 Thread Jerry
There are several PRs that are years (literally) old. For example: o 2005/10/13 ports/87397 edwin [patch] incorrect use of PAPERSIZE make variable in some ports Maybe it is time that some of these extremely old PRs be put to rest. Perhaps