Dear all,
Apropos nothing much at all, but congruent with some of the discussion
going on in this list at the moment, I've been playing around loading
ports index related data into a RDBMS and querying that to pull out
interesting factoids, or indeed a complete INDEX file. I didn't start
doing t
Hi!
> it might be vaguely useful here and there, so I've stuck a copy on my
> website:
>
>http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/articles/portindexdb/
http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/articles/portindexdb.html
works better 8-)
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372
On 20/01/2012 18:20, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> it might be vaguely useful here and there, so I've stuck a copy on my
>> website:
>>
>>http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/articles/portindexdb/
>
> http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/articles/portindexdb.html
>
> works better 8-)
>
D'Oh!
--
You've probably reimplemented part of ports tinderbox (and, separately,
portsmon and FreshPorts) :)
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-uns
On 20/01/2012 19:25, Mark Linimon wrote:
> You've probably reimplemented part of ports tinderbox (and, separately,
> portsmon and FreshPorts) :)
I have this other invention I've been calling 'a rotationally
symmetrical device designed to facilitate travel.'
Cheers,
Matthew
--
D
On Friday 20 January 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>On 20/01/2012 19:25, Mark Linimon wrote:
>> You've probably reimplemented part of ports tinderbox (and, separately,
>> portsmon and FreshPorts) :)
>
>I have this other invention I've been calling 'a rotationally
>symmetrical device designed to facil
Hi,
> Apropos nothing much at all, but congruent with some of the discussion
> going on in this list at the moment, I've been playing around loading
> ports index related data into a RDBMS and querying that to pull out
> interesting factoids, or indeed a complete INDEX file. I didn't start
> doin
On 28/01/2012 02:05, rfl...@acsalaska.net wrote:
> I haven't looked in detail - perl has to leave my head - but what I think
> is a good feature for a database to handle is to find outdated distfiles.
>
> Since the relationship between a portorigin and it's distfile(s) is not
> available otherwise