Re: Fix for FreeBSD-SA-08:01.pty appears to break net/omnitty?

2008-02-25 Thread Marcus Alves Grando
Fixed. Thanks Rong-En Fan wrote: Hi, On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 06:12:59PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:07:07AM +0800, Rong-En Fan wrote: FYI, this is fixed in omnitty 0.3.0_1. Thanks! Should I file a PR against misc/compat6x (because its version of libutil.so is

Re: Fix for FreeBSD-SA-08:01.pty appears to break net/omnitty?

2008-02-19 Thread Rong-En Fan
Hi, On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 06:12:59PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:07:07AM +0800, Rong-En Fan wrote: FYI, this is fixed in omnitty 0.3.0_1. Thanks! Should I file a PR against misc/compat6x (because its version of libutil.so is apparently still subject PTY

Re: Fix for FreeBSD-SA-08:01.pty appears to break net/omnitty?

2008-02-19 Thread Rong-En Fan
FYI, this is fixed in omnitty 0.3.0_1. Regards, Rong-En Fan pgplov1a5rMeE.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Fix for FreeBSD-SA-08:01.pty appears to break net/omnitty?

2008-01-31 Thread Rong-en Fan
On Jan 29, 2008 11:21 AM, David Wolfskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As a sysadmin, it's not unusual for me to have a desire to do similar things on sets of systems; thus, when a colleague pointed out the net/omnitty port to me, it didn't take long for me to find it useful. But I noticed on 21

Fix for FreeBSD-SA-08:01.pty appears to break net/omnitty?

2008-01-28 Thread David Wolfskill
As a sysadmin, it's not unusual for me to have a desire to do similar things on sets of systems; thus, when a colleague pointed out the net/omnitty port to me, it didn't take long for me to find it useful. But I noticed on 21 January that omnitty(1) wasn't working: upon accepting the name of a