On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 01:17:44PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 8/3/2012 12:52 PM, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 04:17:57PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> >> On 7/25/2012 10:03 AM, Michael wrote:
> >>> Any plans to update bash-4.2.28 up to patch level 037?
> >>> I see we still
On 8/3/2012 12:52 PM, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 04:17:57PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> On 7/25/2012 10:03 AM, Michael wrote:
>>> Any plans to update bash-4.2.28 up to patch level 037?
>>> I see we still are on patch level 028.
>
> The Bash patches did not apply cleanly.
Wo
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 04:17:57PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 7/25/2012 10:03 AM, Michael wrote:
> > Any plans to update bash-4.2.28 up to patch level 037?
> > I see we still are on patch level 028.
The Bash patches did not apply cleanly.
> I've submitted a patch to update to 37.
> It's at
On 7/25/2012 10:03 AM, Michael wrote:
> Hello obrien,
>
>
>
> Any plans to update bash-4.2.28 up to patch level 037?
>
> I see we still are on patch level 028.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael Zoon
I've submitted a patch to update to 37.
It's attached to the PR ports/170283:
http://www.fre
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 22:19:45 -0400
Jason Hellenthal articulated:
> Kevin sorry for posting this from your message "it had to go somewhere
> since there was no such great message to reply to." not intended
> directly toward anyone in general.
>
> This thread has turned to nothing but obnoxious dri
Kevin sorry for posting this from your message "it had to go somewhere
since there was no such great message to reply to." not intended
directly toward anyone in general.
This thread has turned to nothing but obnoxious dribble of what used to
be a simple problem to solve.
All of the bash-* patc
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Jerry wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 15:42:38 -0700
> Doug Barton articulated:
>
>> Umm ... wow. I'll try to respond substantively below.
>>
>> On 07/29/2012 04:46, Jerry wrote:
>> > On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
>> > Doug Barton articulated:
>> >
>> >> Co
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 15:42:38 -0700
Doug Barton articulated:
> Umm ... wow. I'll try to respond substantively below.
>
> On 07/29/2012 04:46, Jerry wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
> > Doug Barton articulated:
> >
> >> Completely aside from my being thoroughly impressed with you
Umm ... wow. I'll try to respond substantively below.
On 07/29/2012 04:46, Jerry wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
> Doug Barton articulated:
>
>> Completely aside from my being thoroughly impressed with your
>> mind-reading abilities, upgrading to the latest/greatest is not
>> al
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
Doug Barton articulated:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Jerry wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:14:25 -0700
> > Doug Barton articulated:
> >
> >> On 07/25/2012 08:03, Michael wrote:
> >>> Hello obrien,
> >>>
> >>> Any plans to update bash-4.2.28 up to patch leve
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:14:25 -0700
Doug Barton articulated:
On 07/25/2012 08:03, Michael wrote:
Hello obrien,
Any plans to update bash-4.2.28 up to patch level 037?
Is there a specific bug fixed that you're interested in?
The short answer would be what t
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:14:25 -0700
Doug Barton articulated:
> On 07/25/2012 08:03, Michael wrote:
> > Hello obrien,
> >
> > Any plans to update bash-4.2.28 up to patch level 037?
>
> Is there a specific bug fixed that you're interested in?
The short answer would be what the hell difference does
On 07/25/2012 08:03, Michael wrote:
> Hello obrien,
>
>
>
> Any plans to update bash-4.2.28 up to patch level 037?
Is there a specific bug fixed that you're interested in?
--
Change is hard.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
Hello obrien,
Any plans to update bash-4.2.28 up to patch level 037?
I see we still are on patch level 028.
Regards,
Michael Zoon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubs
14 matches
Mail list logo