Re: FreeBSD Port: linux_base-f10-10_4

2012-03-10 Thread Jos Backus
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > I don't know enough about CentOS, does it make sense to name it c62 or > is the .2 just a maintenance release like Solaris 10 update X (in > this case c6 is sensible, off course)? c6 would be appropriate. 6.2 is a maintenance update.

Re: FreeBSD Port: linux_base-f10-10_4

2012-03-10 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 19:51:33 +0900 Svyatoslav Lempert wrote: > > I just tested CentOS 6.2 and this system binaries work and run > > without problem, but I need change compat.linux.osrelease to 2.6.18, > > I'll make soon port for setup CentOS 6.x userland (like > > emulators/linux_base-f10 there a

Re: FreeBSD Port: linux_base-f10-10_4

2012-03-10 Thread Svyatoslav Lempert
> I just tested CentOS 6.2 and this system binaries work and run without > problem, but I need change compat.linux.osrelease to 2.6.18, > I'll make soon port for setup CentOS 6.x userland (like > emulators/linux_base-f10 there are all very similar) and send this as > PR. Look to http://www.freebsd

Re: FreeBSD Port: linux_base-f10-10_4

2012-03-10 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:44:25 +0100 Alexander Leidinger articulated: > Quoting Barry Tigner (from Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:16:27 > -0500): > > > eagle: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.10' not found (required by > > eagle) > > > > I can run version 5.1 in the meantime. But it looks like I will need >

Re: FreeBSD Port: linux_base-f10-10_4

2012-03-10 Thread Svyatoslav Lempert
2012/3/10 Alexander Leidinger : >> >> # ./bash >> FATAL: kernel too old >> >> # file bash >> bash: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (GNU/Linux), >> dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, stripped >> >> # sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.32 >> compat.linux.osr

Re: FreeBSD Port: linux_base-f10-10_4

2012-03-10 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 15:41:23 +0900 Svyatoslav Lempert wrote: > >>> > eagle: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.10' not found (required > >>> > by eagle) > >>> > > >>> > I can run version 5.1 in the meantime. But it looks like I will > >>> > need an updated version of linux_base-f10, perhaps an f11,

Re: FreeBSD Port: linux_base-f10-10_4

2012-03-09 Thread Svyatoslav Lempert
>>> > eagle: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.10' not found (required by >>> > eagle) >>> > >>> > I can run version 5.1 in the meantime. But it looks like I will need >>> > an updated version of linux_base-f10, perhaps an f11, f12 or f13 or f14 >>> > version. >>> > >>> > Are there plans to update l

Re: FreeBSD Port: linux_base-f10-10_4

2012-03-09 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Lars Engels (from Fri, 9 Mar 2012 14:44:33 +0100): On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:44:25PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Barry Tigner (from Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:16:27 -0500): > eagle: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.10' not found (required by > eagle) > > I can run version

Re: FreeBSD Port: linux_base-f10-10_4

2012-03-09 Thread Lars Engels
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:44:25PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Barry Tigner (from Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:16:27 -0500): > > > eagle: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.10' not found (required by > > eagle) > > > > I can run version 5.1 in the meantime. But it looks like I will need > >

Re: FreeBSD Port: linux_base-f10-10_4

2012-03-09 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Barry Tigner (from Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:16:27 -0500): eagle: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.10' not found (required by eagle) I can run version 5.1 in the meantime. But it looks like I will need an updated version of linux_base-f10, perhaps an f11, f12 or f13 or f14 version. Are ther

FreeBSD Port: linux_base-f10-10_4

2012-03-08 Thread Barry Tigner
Dear Sir(s), I would like to run the latest version of Eagle, an electronic cad program on my freebsd 9.0 AMD64 system. Unfortunately, I am unable to make this work, as the latest version of Eagle reports eagle: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.10' not found (required by eagle) I can run ve