tell me you want me to revert this patch, and do a portepoch.
the solution would be for the submitter to work with the maintainer on a
solution, or am I supposed to fix this without reversing this?
Original Message
Subject: Re: ports/164244: multimedia/mplayer: last upda
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:35:12AM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> the solution would be for the submitter to work with the maintainer
> on a solution, or am I supposed to fix this without reversing this?
In general each of us, as committers, is responsible for whatever side-
effects of the chan
On 1/19/12 12:04 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
So if there's breakage, then it needs to be first understood, then
dealt with. If there is no other way than the horrible backout/PORTEPOCH
dance, then so be it.
But the takeaway is that we can't expect the PR submitters, or even
port maintainers, to g
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 18:04, Mark Linimon wrote:
> So if there's breakage, then it needs to be first understood, then
> dealt with. If there is no other way than the horrible backout/PORTEPOCH
> dance, then so be it.
That's correct.
However I think that in this situation there was no need to
On 19/01/2012 18:00, Thomas Zander wrote:
> It was not the first temporary build problem that one of
> the 15k ports has and it certainly won't be the last.
23k
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 19:03, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> On 19/01/2012 18:00, Thomas Zander wrote:
>> It was not the first temporary build problem that one of
>> the 15k ports has and it certainly won't be the last.
>
> 23k
Sorry, I must have lost count some time in 2005 or so :-)
Riggs
_
