On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Parv wrote: > > in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > wrote Chuck Robey thusly... > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> I'm using pkgdb because I wanted to try portupgrade, and it > >> required it. > > > > portupgrade does not require pkgdb. pkgdb is part of portupgrade; > > portupgrade installs pkgdb. > > I don't doubt that, but portupgrade itself tossed out the instruction to > me to > run pkgdb -F, to fix something (I don't know what). I didn't just want to > run > something which has such a confusing man page. I ran it under > instructions, and > now it's asking me questions which I can't figure out the effects of any > of the > offered actions will be. > > Everyone seems to want to toss me hazy hints instead of what those options > actually accomplish; I'm beginning to think that the only folks who are > answering are the folks who don't really know the answer. > > > > > > > - Parv > > > y => yes, I want the stale dependency to map to the proposed one. n => no, that proposed replacement is pure poppycock. a => who knows... [the Ruby code doesn't make sense for my virgin eyes -- I only do shell scripts, Perl, and some TCL :)..] The line of referring to is /usr/local/sbin/pkgdb:646. -Garrett _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
