On 17/07/2010 12:56, Ed Schouten wrote:
> ...
>
> This has various implications. The most important one I can think of, is
> that the daemon can still do open("/dev/tty", ...) if it wants and spam
> your TTY, even if the daemon is running as user `nobody'. This also
> means that if you run the rc
Hey,
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:25:03 -0700
Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/20/10 16:46, Jos Backus wrote:
> > Fwiw, I would much prefer FreeBSD ship with some sort of process supervisor
> > a la daemontools.
>
> That's an interesting idea, but until we have someone willing to
> actually do that work we
On 07/20/10 16:46, Jos Backus wrote:
> Fwiw, I would much prefer FreeBSD ship with some sort of process supervisor
> a la daemontools.
That's an interesting idea, but until we have someone willing to
actually do that work we need to deal with what we have.
Doug
--
Improve the effectiv
Fwiw, I would much prefer FreeBSD ship with some sort of process supervisor
a la daemontools.
Jos
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr.
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Greg Larkin wrote:
Hi Doug,
Thank you for the useful background information and ideas about how to
proceed forward. I'll put this task on my list (hah!) and see how much
progress I can make.
Glad to help! :)
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Doug Barton wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Greg Larkin wrote:
[...]
>> Anyway, here are some examples for daemonizing processes that don't
>> already have support for doing it themselves:
>>
>> Daemonizing an executable without internal daemon support:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Greg Larkin wrote:
Ed Schouten wrote:
Hello port maintainers,
I think I'd better send an email about this to ports@, because I've seen
it in various places and it is getting a bit tiresome to mail all port
authors individually.
Unfortunately not all port maintainers foll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ed Schouten wrote:
> Hello port maintainers,
>
> I think I'd better send an email about this to ports@, because I've seen
> it in various places and it is getting a bit tiresome to mail all port
> authors individually.
>
> I've seen various cases in
jhell writes:
> Also another use with the case above. Running top(1) instead of su(1)
> you should see the same symptoms.
>
Use `-f' option in daemon(8). Otherwise it'd still spam to tty.
$ daemon top
$ procstat -f $(pgrep top)
PID COMM FD T V FLAGSREF OFFSET PRO NAME
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:43, jhell wrote:
In Message-Id:
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:56, Ed Schouten wrote:
In Message-Id: <20100717105658.gv1...@hoeg.nl>
Hello port maintainers,
I think I'd better send an email about this to ports@, because I've seen
it in various places and it is getting a bit
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:56, Ed Schouten wrote:
In Message-Id: <20100717105658.gv1...@hoeg.nl>
Hello port maintainers,
I think I'd better send an email about this to ports@, because I've seen
it in various places and it is getting a bit tiresome to mail all port
authors individually.
I've seen
Hello port maintainers,
I think I'd better send an email about this to ports@, because I've seen
it in various places and it is getting a bit tiresome to mail all port
authors individually.
I've seen various cases in the past where people write rc scripts that
do the following:
command="
12 matches
Mail list logo
