On 11/12/15 16:59, Matthew Seaman wrote:
What you have installed should ideally have no bearing on making an
INDEX. What will affect the INDEX are settings in your /etc/make.conf
or similar and various OPTIONS choices that can modify the dependency graph.
I thought so... but: I have (had) not
On 2015/11/12 15:43, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> On 11/12/15 15:49, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
>> Do you have
>>
>> databases/mysql51-server
>>
>> installed ?
>>
>> It was removed on the 10th because it is EOL'ed upstream:
>>
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/2015-November/109400.html
>
On 11/12/15 15:49, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Do you have
databases/mysql51-server
installed ?
It was removed on the 10th because it is EOL'ed upstream:
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/2015-November/109400.html
Yes.
I thought this wouldn't matter when building INDEX, and was goi
Hi!
> After a svn update, portsdb -uU gives:
>
> > Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX20151112-25196-13whzns -
> > please wait..
> > make_index: /usr/ports/audio/amarok-kde4:
> > no entry for /usr/ports/databases/mysql51-server
> > Done.
> > failed to generate INDEX!
> > portsdb: ind
Hello.
Since yesterday I cannot generate INDEX on my system anymore.
After a svn update, portsdb -uU gives:
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX20151112-25196-13whzns - please
wait..
> make_index: /usr/ports/audio/amarok-kde4:
> no entry for /usr/ports/databases/mysql51-server
Done
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 00:32 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> > No, the patch won't work. According to
> > http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/porting.html,
> > the right way is always define WANT_GNOME which won't pull
> > any gnome dependencies unless USE_GNOM
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> No, the patch won't work. According to
> http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/porting.html,
> the right way is always define WANT_GNOME which won't pull
> any gnome dependencies unless USE_GNOME is used.
>
> I think after USE_PERL5_BUILD line, add
>
> WANT_G
Rong-en Fan píše v pá 13. 04. 2007 v 19:39 +0800:
> I think after USE_PERL5_BUILD line, add
>
> WANT_GNOME=yes
>
> and use += for USE_GNOME after bsd.port.pre.mk
The usual workaround is
USE_GNOME= # empty
.include
USE_GNOME+= foo bar baz
--
Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 4/13/07, Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> I think it's because lang/gcc41, gcc42's usage of USE_GNOME is incorrect.
> It should be
>
> WANT_GNOME= yes
>
> .include
>
> USE_GNOME+=
>
> And our INDEX builder is i386, so we don't see this.
Than
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> I think it's because lang/gcc41, gcc42's usage of USE_GNOME is incorrect.
> It should be
>
> WANT_GNOME= yes
>
> .include
>
> USE_GNOME+=
>
> And our INDEX builder is i386, so we don't see this.
Thanks for the report and the diagnosis. I'm away from
On Thursday 12 April 2007 20:03:45 Rong-en Fan wrote:
> On 4/13/07, Andy Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 12 April 2007 14:49:28 David wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I run my own cvsup server for internal use so we do not overload your
> > > servers. It updates once per day then al
On 4/13/07, Andy Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 12 April 2007 14:49:28 David wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I run my own cvsup server for internal use so we do not overload your
> servers. It updates once per day then all our other servers update from
> it. This is all working and is not repo
On Thursday 12 April 2007 14:49:28 David wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I run my own cvsup server for internal use so we do not overload your
> servers. It updates once per day then all our other servers update from
> it. This is all working and is not reporting any errors.
>
> For the last couple of days I ha
Hi,
I run my own cvsup server for internal use so we do not overload your
servers. It updates once per day then all our other servers update from
it. This is all working and is not reporting any errors.
For the last couple of days I have been getting this error when updating
from this serv
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:33:47AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> You get evidence supporting the hypothesis I'm an idiot.
> Thanks.
No problem, there are plenty of ways to shoot your feet off, I've spent
the last few decades iterating over them.
mcl
_
Mark Linimon writes:
> What happens if you do "make -V WITH_MOZILLA"?
You get evidence supporting the hypothesis I'm an idiot.
Thanks.
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 09:10:00AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Can anyone tell me what broke here?
>
> Updating collection ports-base/cvs
> Finished successfully
> Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
> wait..eclipse-3.1.2: "/usr/ports/www/"firefox"" non-existent --
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 09:10:00AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> Updating collection ports-base/cvs
> Finished successfully
> Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please
> wait..eclipse-3.1.2: "/usr/ports/www/"firefox"" non-existent -- dependency
> list incomplete
> ===> java/eclipse
Can anyone tell me what broke here?
Updating collection ports-base/cvs
Finished successfully
Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..eclipse-3.1.2:
"/usr/ports/www/"firefox"" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete
===> java/eclipse failed
*** Error code 1
1 e
19 matches
Mail list logo
