On 01/01/13 23:07, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
On 14 December 2012 13:08, Jim Pingle wrote:
On 13 Dec 2012 16:57, "Jim Pingle" wrote:
I saw a thread last month about the servers that build INDEX
files being
down since the security incident - is that still the case?
On 12/13/2012 6:
On 14 December 2012 13:08, Jim Pingle wrote:
>>> On 13 Dec 2012 16:57, "Jim Pingle" wrote:
>>> I saw a thread last month about the servers that build INDEX
> files being
>>> down since the security incident - is that still the case?
>>
>> On 12/13/2012 6:35 PM, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
>
>> On 13 Dec 2012 16:57, "Jim Pingle" wrote:
>> I saw a thread last month about the servers that build INDEX
files being
>> down since the security incident - is that still the case?
>
> On 12/13/2012 6:35 PM, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
> I had forgotten about it again. I will try and to ge
I had forgotten about it again. I will try and to get it fixed within the
next couple of days.
--
Simon L. B. Nielsen
Via mobile
Sorry about the top posting
On 13 Dec 2012 16:57, "Jim Pingle" wrote:
> I saw a thread last month about the servers that build INDEX files being
> down since the secu
I saw a thread last month about the servers that build INDEX files being
down since the security incident - is that still the case?
The files obtained via make fetchindex are still out of date, so I
assume they're still off, but a while back they were just missed after
some maintenance as well so
On 09/03/11 12:41, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
In light of the upcoming release of 9.0-RELEASE it might be a good idea
to start providing INDEX-9 via portsnap. Especially since we want
people to try the BETA releases.
Yes, this will happen soon.
--
Colin Percival
Security Officer, FreeBSD
In light of the upcoming release of 9.0-RELEASE it might be a good idea
to start providing INDEX-9 via portsnap. Especially since we want
people to try the BETA releases.
Thoughts?
Emanuel
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
